rband04
Trade Count:
( 0)
Apprentice
 Offline
Posts: 11
installer , computer and sound gimik
|
 |
« on: May 20, 2007 at 09:43 PM » |
|
share naman mga pre
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ADM202E
Trade Count:
( 0)
Collector
Offline
Posts: 390
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Jun 25, 2007 at 01:14 PM » |
|
Totally blew up AMD!  'Used to be AMD fanatic now Im totally C2D follower. Check out tipidpc forums for more feedbacks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Alfie
Trade Count:
( +8)
PinoyDVD Legend
Offline
Posts: 2,487
Hello!
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Jun 26, 2007 at 12:54 PM » |
|
Totally agree with Core2Duo, handles Vista so well, make rendering much easier, however, if you plan to stick it out with XP, and be discriminating of the softwares you'll install, the dual core are a lot cheaper nowadays, and can perform and render as well (maybe as long as you have not shifted to the resource hungry Vista)  . BTW.......to maximize your C2D potential, one should get a very good Video card. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ADM202E
Trade Count:
( 0)
Collector
Offline
Posts: 390
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Jul 02, 2007 at 03:04 PM » |
|
.... and beef up a lot of memory..... 1gig will do but it will definitely bitin specially in high end games and if you're running on vista ultimate edition..... 2 gig memory is sufficient for gaming rig. Mine is 3 gig, 1 gig per slot. CNC3 and Company of Heroes are flawlessly running under E6300 C2D.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dts-HD 3D
Trade Count:
( +27)
DVD Guru
Offline
Posts: 1,763
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Jul 09, 2007 at 01:14 PM » |
|
In 3D renderings, w/ same amount of memory(2GB) my E6400 is 3X to 4X faster than my Athlon64 3200 . . . amazing!
Quads are now available and cost more than twice. Q6600 is P27,5K Intel mobo is P10,8K . . . argh.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aremdvna
Trade Count:
( 0)
Apprentice
Offline
Posts: 11
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Nov 04, 2008 at 10:17 AM » |
|
I'm using a 2.8GHz Pentium-D, 800MHz FSB, 2MB cache. It's a dual core processor. I was thinking about upgrading CPU, but my computer runs good. I put it thru a lot more multitasking than the average user, downloading torrents, converting videos, and burning disks with no problems at the same time. The difference I can see when comparing equal speed CPU's Pentium D, to Dual Core, Core 2 Duo, Dual Core Extreme are the FSB (Front Side Bus) and cache. My previous MoBo only had an 800MHz FSB so the Pentium-D was a good choice for me. My new MoBo has a 1333MHz front side bus, so if I was to upgrade I'd choose a Dual Core, Core 2 Duo, or Dual Core Extreme with a 1333MHz front side bus. Someone suggest to me to get a slower Dual Core CPU, because Pentium-D sucks. Clearly he had little clue as to what he was talking about. If you're MoBo only has an 800MHz front side bus, compare the prices of the fastest Pentium-D you can find to the prices of an equivalent speed Dual Core or Core 2 Duo CPU. Granted it might have a little more cache, but is the price difference worth it?
Compare:
Pentium-D 925 or 930
3.0GHz
800MHz FSB
4MB Cache
Core 2 Duo E8400
3.0GHz
1333MHz FSB
6MB Cache
The Pentium-D should be much cheaper than the Core 2 Duo. I'm guessing about 3,000 pesos more. How would you know which one performes better? Clearly they runs at the same clock speed. Does the FSB and extra 2MB of Cache make it better? Most likely yes, but is it worth the extra money for that slight bit of improvement. If I where to upgrade, I'd personally consider the Pentium-D 950 3.4Ghz.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Clondalkin
Trade Count:
( +16)
PinoyDVD Legend
Offline
Posts: 3,956
Tea the gift of life...
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Nov 05, 2008 at 08:35 AM » |
|
My Pentium D 3.0Ghz Dell Dimension 9100 CANNOT handle 1080p mkvs. Tested close to 100 1080p titles already. Nothing plays smoothly. Nothing.
My Core 2 Duo E6600 Gateway CAN play anything including 15GB, 11MB/sec and higher bitrate 1080p files.
That's the biggest difference between them. All other applications are just fine. So if a user only plays Divx, avi, VOB, ISO or 720p, you'll have no problem with Pentium-D. But for 1080ps - totally hopeless. Talo pa ng NMT.
Despite the slower clock speed, the C2D is way way more efficient than Pentium-D when given the hardest tasks possible.
Configuration
Dell Dimension 9100
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
ATI HD3870
4GB RAM
XP Pro
Gateway
C2D E6600
ATI HD4850
4GB RAM
Vista Home Premium
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thesaint
Trade Count:
( 0)
Collector
Offline
Posts: 141
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Nov 16, 2008 at 11:14 AM » |
|
my new htpc set-up intel dualcore na 2.53Ghz
can handle 1080p/kahit ang source ay naka network.
13k lang assemble ko....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gb
Trade Count:
( +15)
Collector
Offline
Posts: 159
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Nov 23, 2008 at 10:21 PM » |
|
my new htpc set-up intel dualcore na 2.53Ghz
can handle 1080p/kahit ang source ay naka network.
13k lang assemble ko....
wow mura toh ahh. ano ba specs nito... di naman cguro shared ung vc bro, pa pm nga ng specs... tanks, gb |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thesaint
Trade Count:
( 0)
Collector
Offline
Posts: 141
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Jan 04, 2009 at 12:04 AM » |
|
Kaya kasi mura yung lumang 160Gig na HDD ko at yung BDRW na nasa isang kong desktop ay
ginamit ko dito sa HTPC ko...
kaya 13k lang ang inabot
intel E5200
ECS G31T
1 Gig memmory
512 inno3d 8500GT
Orient slim case
iMaster 450W PSU
A4tech wireless kybr / mouse (galing din sa isa kong pc)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
