For me, the synergy is there. It just lacks a little headroom from the amp.
Don't get me wrong, it sounded very good for the system cost that we're talking about (especially since the Preamp/DAC and the Power Amp were comparatively budget-fare when compared to other gear in that show). It's just that those speakers were capable of much more.
I also feel that the output reflects the impedance characteristics of the speaker, and that it'd benefit from lots of amp current capacity and grip.
I'd like to note that I'm used to a fairly fast, snappy and impactful sound, and I'm sure that's not to everyone's liking.
Things I liked in this system:
1. Neutral presentation from top to bottom (spectral balance is among the best in the show, I think)
2. It never sounded bad with any good track (it seemed to be very flexible with material)
3. Clean and revealing top end coupled with a textured midrange (it might not emphasize details, but it has all you have to hear)
4. Some layering was noticeable (and this is a lot better than many systems yesterday that threw diffused images on a stage that is wide but defines no depth)
5. Fatigue-free sound for most listening levels (admittedly, there was a tendency for the speaker to be slightly forward and shouty at very high volumes, but this is typical for flat-voiced speakers)
6. Good weight and extension for bookshelf speakers (the system had notable output down to about 50Hz or so)
7. Excellent price to performance ratio (this matters to people like me who are poor and wretched)
8. Nice cabinet finish and apparent build (I've seen many pictures, and it looks better in person)
Things I missed that I believe can be fixed with different upstream components (based on my experience with the LSi9 and other similar speakers):
1. I would've liked a faster and more impactful presentation (certainly achievable with different electronics and cables).
2. Some extra bite and sparkle in the HF would make things more lively (same solution as above).
3. Large scale dynamics and bottom end extension needed a bit of help (a high current amp would likely bring out enough punch and urgency to cover for most of the lack in absolute depth).
4. Images were in soft focus and profound layering was absent (likely fixable with cables and electronics).
5. I feel that there was a lack of sufficient attack and aggression (or crunch) in the presentation of certain tracks (likely fixable with cables).
As for Topper's Pepsi Challenge: I think this drink might not be the best Champagne, but it is definitely an excellent Cremant. Something that can be as enjoyable, while being far more affordable.
The savings could be used for better electronics, which may in fact yield a much nicer system. Think of it as Cremant + Ham + Turkey versus Champagne + Hotdog + Tapa (or Tuyo).
So kailan mo i=popost sa gallery mo yun LsiM?
I have another suggestion. Why don't you also try the NuForce amp with your Lsi9 first.
Good idea!
