Author Topic: is plasma the thing of the past?  (Read 778 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jonick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
is plasma the thing of the past?
« on: Jul 08, 2009 at 04:46 PM »
i have 2 42" plasmas right now and im planning to get another 42" panasonic plasma but after i read this news in yahoo im having 2nd thoughts... is this really true? should i buy lcd instead? here it is:


As the technology fades, plasma TVs see huge discounts

The exodus toward flat-screen TVs continues, and that's been driving prices down across the board.

But if you're looking for the real deals, plasma is where it's at for now, according to a story in the Wall Street Journal.

What's going on? Put simply, plasma is a technology on its way out. Pioneer and Vizio have already announced this year that they're exiting the market, as manufacturers continue to pour their resources into LCD technology. LCD, used widely across the consumer electronics industry in not just televisions but also computer monitors, laptops, and even cameras and cell phones, has boundless momentum. Plasma, with its higher power requirements, larger size and weight, and finicky reliability, has remained TV-centric since its invention, despite some key benefits that have given the technology something of a cult following.

Meanwhile, there are still plenty of plasmas on the market, and not just close-out models. And diligent shoppers can find exceptional deals on plasma sets: Roughly 20 percent cheaper vs. LCD sets of the same size.

The WSJ story linked above note that a 50-inch LCD will run you $1,500 on average, while a 50-inch plasma runs about $1,200. Although prices vary widely from brand to brand and depend a lot on the features you select, in general the trend follows across the industry. Drop into any big-box electronics store and you're sure to see big discounts on all the plasma sets for sale.

Naturally there's a catch: As plasma vanishes from the market, you'll have an increasing amount of trouble finding someone who can service the set if it breaks. You'll also be stuck buying a very large set if you want a plasma: The technology starts at 42 inches diagonally, and you'll probably need a friend to help you move the thing, too.

Not everyone's giving up on plasma, though: Panasonic, which has long been the extreme market share leader in the plasma category, continues to invest in the technology and just constructed a new $3 billion plant to build the screens. What, didn't they get the memo?

Offline oReOsHaKe

  • Trade Count: (+642)
  • PinoyDVD Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,743
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 9
Re: is plasma the thing of the past?
« Reply #1 on: Jul 08, 2009 at 05:07 PM »
A yahoo article?  I don't put weight on articles published in yahoo.  Probably if it is published in AVforum or some other AV specialty websites then I would think twice about it.
DALI OPTICON 8 : Zensor : Polk Audio F/XiA4 : ONKYO 5010 : OPPO BDP-103 : Panny AE8000 : Dual PB1000

Offline pekspert

  • Trade Count: (+192)
  • PinoyDVD Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,268
  • cell 0916-777-3000
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 47
Re: is plasma the thing of the past?
« Reply #2 on: Jul 08, 2009 at 05:48 PM »
shouldnt you be glad instead that youre getting a huge savings on your next purchase? why worry about what the trend is? as long as the plasma tv will serve you for a good 20yrs, thats ok. I have 2 lcd tv's and my next purchase will be a plasma.
84" 100" 120" 150" Motorized or Manual Projector Screens still available. Just pm.

Offline barrister

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • PinoyDVD Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,028
  • cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: is plasma the thing of the past?
« Reply #3 on: Jul 08, 2009 at 09:33 PM »
... im planning to get another 42" panasonic plasma but after i read this news in yahoo im having 2nd thoughts... is this really true? should i buy lcd instead? here it is:

The Yahoo article was based on a Wall Street Journal article entitled, "Lower Price Tag for Plasma TVs Comes at Price": 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204556804574259990242827838.html

Unfortunately, the Wall Street Journal is not a reliable source of tech info either. 




Here's a reaction from ZDNet's Sean Portnoy:



The Wall Street Journal shows the limits of its HDTV knowledge
June 30th, 2009
Posted by Sean Portnoy @ 7:11 pm

I can’t really argue with some aspects of a new Wall St Journal story titled “Lower Price Tag for Plasma TVs Comes at Price, but if you already have some knowledge about HDTVs, don’t expect much illumination from the article.


http://blogs.zdnet.com/home-theater/?p=1127
 
« Last Edit: Jul 09, 2009 at 09:25 AM by barrister »