PinoyDVD: The Pinoy Digital Video & Devices Community

Home Theater => Displays => Flat Panels => Topic started by: francois on May 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM

Title: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on May 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Hi Guys,

Hope somebody would do a review of the new Panny 42C10.

Was looking for a 42PV80 but units were sold-out already.

The 42C10 might be a cheaper alternative to the 42PX10.

Comparison of the C10 to the PV80 & PX10 would be much appreciated, too.


42C10 at a glance:

TV Type: Plasma
Diagonal Screen Size: 42 inches
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Contrast Ratio: 2,000,000:1
Features:
600 hz sub-field drive
   SD card slot
   Viera link
   x.v color-ready
   1080p24 input-ready
   2x hdmi inputs
   v-audio surround
   optical av output
Dimensions: 661 x 1029 x 100 mm
Weight: 26 kg
Approx Php50K


Hi Carlo777/Comitatus,

Truly appreciate your reviews.

Hope the 42C10 merits a review from you guys, too!


Regards to all PDVDers!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 27, 2009 at 02:23 PM
Hi Guys,

Hope somebody would do a review of the new Panny 42C10.

Was looking for a 42PV80 but units were sold-out already.

The 42C10 might be a cheaper alternative to the 42PX10.

Comparison of the C10 to the PV80 & PX10 would be much appreciated, too.


42C10 at a glance:

TV Type: Plasma
Diagonal Screen Size: 42 inches
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Resolution: 1024 x 768
Contrast Ratio: 2,000,000:1
Features:
600 hz sub-field drive
   SD card slot
   Viera link
   x.v color-ready
   1080p24 input-ready
   2x hdmi inputs
   v-audio surround
   optical av output
Dimensions: 661 x 1029 x 100 mm
Weight: 26 kg
Approx Php50K


Hi Carlo777/Comitatus,

Truly appreciate your reviews.

Hope the 42C10 merits a review from you guys, too!


Regards to all PDVDers!


Yes! It does merit a review and I'll post it this week.

Medyo mabagal tayo ngayon kasi, in truth, I'm not into the"hobby" anymore. Sawa na ng konti, but I still hang around to check out new stuff and to answer PM's.

This forum has been a wealth of info for me and I trust the views of the guys here, over the more "expert" reviews floating around the net (Initially, the expert reviews got me more confused) . I remember, when I joined Pdvd late last year, I didn't know jack about T.V's because watching movies was never my hobby to begin with. I was only looking for a good T.V for my PS3 and it lead to a very expensive quest ;)

Folks like, barrister, Clondalkin, ninjababez were very informative and helpful. Sellers from Theatreworks and Sights and Sounds are also people you can count on.

I'm impressed with these guys among others. God Bless^
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: arvin.poker on May 27, 2009 at 03:57 PM
yup i'm also waiting for the review ng 42C10. dapat 3 weeks ago mabibil ko na sana ang 42PV80 kaso c misis pina-hold na muna ang bili ko. ayan wala na tuloy stock.... so i might go for this new model kung ok ang review....
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: guido on May 27, 2009 at 04:34 PM
ako rin waiting for a local pdvd review.
here's what i've found on the net recently comparing the x10 and c10

http://www.avforums.com/forums/plasma-televisions/992493-tx-p42x10-tx-p42c10.html
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Nemesis91 on May 27, 2009 at 04:39 PM
You can test the unit at trinoma, by friday nandun na. ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: anchit on May 27, 2009 at 05:11 PM
magkano price range nito jeff? thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 27, 2009 at 06:32 PM
magkano price range nito jeff? thanks!

Sir, pa off topic lang sandali. Can you share your PV70 settings? (Via PM if possible)

Back to the C10, per spec, it's similar to the X10 but I'll have to see that for myself. It looks like the C10 is the new PV8 and the X10 is the new PV80. Will verify and confirm this within the week or so.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Nemesis91 on May 28, 2009 at 03:39 PM
C series
(http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o28/pe_jefferson/42c10.jpg)

At A Glance

TV type Plasma 
Diagonal screen size 42 inch
Aspect ratio 16:9 
Dimensions (HxWxD) 661 x 1029 x 100 mm
Weight 26 kg
Contrast ratio 2000000:1 

General
TV typePlasma 
Diagonal screen size42 inch
Aspect ratio16:9 
Additional features600Hz sub-field drive; onboard JPEG playback via SD card slot; Viera Link (HDMI-CEC); x.v.Color-ready; 1080p24 input-ready; dual HDMI 1.3 inputs. 
Dimensions (HxWxD)661 x 1029 x 100 mm
Weight26 kgAudio
Surround effectsV-Audio. 
Total output power10W x 2 
Additional featuresOptical digital audio output. Video
Video inputS-video, VGA, Composite video, Component video 
Contrast ratio2000000:1 
Additional features1024 x 768 resolution; HD-compatible

this is the replacement unit of our late 42pv8. ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: arvin.poker on May 28, 2009 at 03:55 PM
sir bat parang di maganda review d2 sa net. masyado daw reflective walang "Natural Vision FilterAR".  e hanggang 50K lang budget ko for plasma tv.....  wahh di ko na alam bibilin ko tuloy. wala na nga pv80 tapos dami negative review pa sa C10....

guru's what's your comment on this.... thanks!


ako rin waiting for a local pdvd review.
here's what i've found on the net recently comparing the x10 and c10

http://www.avforums.com/forums/plasma-televisions/992493-tx-p42x10-tx-p42c10.html
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 28, 2009 at 04:22 PM
sir bat parang di maganda review d2 sa net. masyado daw reflective walang "Natural Vision FilterAR".  e hanggang 50K lang budget ko for plasma tv.....  wahh di ko na alam bibilin ko tuloy. wala na nga pv80 tapos dami negative review pa sa C10....

guru's what's your comment on this.... thanks!



Hello sir!

All plasma units have a measure of "reflectiveness" regardless of brand and model. It's hard to make a spot judgement call, because tolerance for "reflectiveness' varies from one person to another. For me, plasma reflections have never been an issue, so it does not bother me. For the sake of your concern, I checked my PV70/80 and PY800 to see if there is a huge leap in the "anti-reflectiveness" evolution of the models I have, and to my surprise they all seem to be "reflective" one way or the other with very minimal differences.

The best way sir, is to go to Theatreworks, or Sights and Sounds, or wherever you feel most comfortable and see the unit for yourself. Just to gauge your tolerance of the "reflectiveness" of the C10.

Anyway, I'll check the unit out tomorrow and will post my findings.

Kung may tanong pa sir just post away=)


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on May 29, 2009 at 02:26 PM
Thanks Carlo!

Looking forward to your review!




Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: patupup on May 29, 2009 at 02:34 PM
magkano price range nito jeff? thanks!
ano nga ba price range nito? ty!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 29, 2009 at 05:02 PM
Thanks Carlo!

Looking forward to your review!






Saw it already and will do a full review later!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: tailhook on May 29, 2009 at 06:16 PM
^ - ill also be looking forward to your review sir! thanks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: emvi_2000 on May 29, 2009 at 06:34 PM
can hardly wait for the review...

btw, saw the x10 a few days ago and i liked the colors...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM
The Panasonic 42C10:

Dvd/Blu-ray

We tested the DVD performance of the C10 using the new "Underworld 3: Rise of the Lycans" movie and we immediately observed the T.V's deep blacks and rich colors. For the most part, picture defenition remains clear and clean, screen uniformity was near perfect, as expected from a plasma. Blu-ray at 720p, playing "Transformers" was a total blast, fast moving scenes were handled with no traces of motion blur, pixelation, and picture breaks that are commonly associated with lower bracket LCD's. Over-all movie defenition was brighter than the previous models like the PV8/80, without compromising the inky blacks we've come to admire with Panasonic's line of plasma's.

PS3:

Running a 720p native game like "Street Fighter 4" demonstrated razor sharp input response times that will surely impress even the most "hard-core" precision savy gamers. As expected, I saw flashes of the notorious green trails (known to techies as "The Phosphor Lag") during quick pans of first person shooters like "Resistance". However, it won't derail your senses because the over-all picture presentation remains strong, with vibrant colors, less the eye strain - Something very much welcomed for those who would want to bed with their plasma's and their ps3's.

The PV8 and PV80 factor:

I, for one laments the demise of these two legendary models, but the arrival and the subsequent performance of the C10 gives you a feeling that Panasonic really knows how to come up with evolutionary means to sustain the technology in a sea of high tech wonders like the 120hz LCD, LED and OLED. Though the difference in picture quality between the C10 and the PV8/80 are not miles apart, the C10 is your best bet for a solid 720p performance - If you skipped the 2008 wonders. So let the PV8 and 80 (though legends they are) rest in the halls of Valhalla - A worthy successor has arrived! Did I mention that the C10 is only around 50k?

"But it's just a 720p T.V???" factor:

Sure, the C10 is a "mere" 720p native T.V tuned for a 1080p/24p performance, but I can honestly say that it beats the Samsung FULL HD A550 in the area of color accuracy and over-all movie picture performance. It even trumps above my A650 FULL HD T.V in-terms of black levels and screen uniformity. Not bad for a "mere" 720p T.V right? Crispy video game detail/s presentation, unfortunately or fortunately (depending on how you look at it) still belongs to the FULL HD panels where pixel and polygon counts really matter.

Pro's
+Very good blacks
+Rich and vibrant colors without the "eye strain"
+Near perfect viewing angles
+Well priced

Con's
-The usual green trails
-Some minor image retention after video game play (I need to look at this again because my eyes were already tired from the test)
-Fuzzy game detail compared to FULL HD units like the A550,A650 and PY800.

More on this tomorrow, but so far the C10 is looking good from all angles that truly matter on a T.V ;) Sorry but this was one very quick typing spree^
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on May 30, 2009 at 08:03 AM
Maraming salamat Carlo!

Truly appreciate the time & effort spent to accommodate this review!

Great help indeed!

 :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on May 30, 2009 at 02:04 PM
If you dont know much about TVs and dont know what to look for, then Carlo777 will help you. His reviews are all about what to look for when you are aiming for your dream TV. There is so much advice here. He gives tips on what to look for when inspecting a TV, things to do on a test drive and so on. Written in simple to understand format, I highly recommend everyone to read his review before you make your final TV purchase. Comprehensive advice.  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: blued888 on May 30, 2009 at 02:10 PM
What exactly is the difference of this from the X series? Kasi almost 20k price difference between the two.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 30, 2009 at 02:22 PM
If you dont know much about TVs and dont know what to look for, then Carlo777 will help you. His reviews are all about what to look for when you are aiming for your dream TV. There is so much advice here. He gives tips on what to look for when inspecting a TV, things to do on a test drive and so on. Written in simple to understand format, I highly recommend everyone to read his review before you make your final TV purchase. Comprehensive advice.  :D

Thanks vic!

What exactly is the difference of this from the X series? Kasi almost 20k price difference between the two.

I'll ask my wife to post the differences between the two. So far, picture wise, they look identical to me.

Got a number of PM's asking me how this fares against a PY800...

At a sudden glance you may notice that the C10 may look more "High Def" than the Full HD PY800, because of it's rich color defenition. However, a close examination will show that the PY800 has better defined details and for me, a more "refined" pq even over the C10.

Just my observation.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on May 30, 2009 at 02:47 PM
Initial Limited Introductory Stocks Available

Panasonic TH-P42C10 at 12 months P57250. Call for cash discount.

Units are selling very fast. Only a few units available. Re-stocking will come on next 2 weeks again.

Available at Sights and Sounds 4th level Shangri-La Plaza. Tel. 634-1789 to 90.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on May 30, 2009 at 07:49 PM
Regarding "reflectiveness", how does the C10 compares with the PV80 or the X10?

I understand it does not have the AR feature.

 :)


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 30, 2009 at 08:06 PM
Regarding "reflectiveness", how does the C10 compares with the PV80 or the X10?

I understand it does not have the AR feature.

 :)




It was difficult for me to simulate "reflectiveness" on the showroom floor, but as far as I remember, it was similar to the PV80. I could be wrong though...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: tailhook on May 30, 2009 at 08:59 PM
thanks carlo. your review of this model is what finally seals the deal. im getting one! sa tagal kung pag antay ng pv8 or 80, may mas ok pa pala. ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: arvin.poker on May 30, 2009 at 11:03 PM
thanks sir carlo. at first i was disappointed on not getting the PV80 last month pero after reading your review napaganda pa pala paghihintay ko. C10 here i come...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 30, 2009 at 11:33 PM
You're welcome, just check the "reflectiveness" of the model. I was not able to dig that one in detail.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on May 31, 2009 at 12:12 AM
ako rin waiting for a local pdvd review.
here's what i've found on the net recently comparing the x10 and c10

http://www.avforums.com/forums/plasma-televisions/992493-tx-p42x10-tx-p42c10.html

Reading the comparison in this avsforum made me fall asleep... There's no need to go thru all 12 pages of it..  Instead of the usual detailed comparison of features and reviews, it just boiled down to a "screen reflection issue" debate between the 2 models...

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 31, 2009 at 12:37 AM
Reading the comparison in this avsforum made me fall asleep... There's no need to go thru all 12 pages of it..  Instead of the usual detailed comparison of features and reviews, it just boiled down to a "screen reflection issue" debate between the 2 models...



I was just reading the thread, and yes it seems to veer towards the reflection issue of the C10. My advise for people who are interested in the model, would be to check the unit out for yourselves and see if the lack of the A.R feature is acceptable for you.

Do take note I was never bothered by plasma's screen reflection, even way back with my first encounter with a plasma, which was a very "reflective" panny px500.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on May 31, 2009 at 12:53 AM
I was just reading thread, and yes it seems to veer towards the reflection issue of the C10. My advise for people who are interested in the model, would be to check the unit out for yourselves and see if the lack of the A.R feature is acceptable for you.

Do take note I was never bothered by plasma's screen reflection, even way back with my first encounter with a plasma, which was a very "reflective" panny px500.



Likewise sir with my older pv70 ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 31, 2009 at 01:10 AM
Likewise sir with my older pv70 ;)

I'm sorry for the off topic post and I hope people here can forgive me, but since you're a proud owner of a PV70 (which I'am too). Would you be kind enough to send me a PM of your settings for DVD use.

Thank you.

Anyway, I don't want the topic to be a C10 "screen reflection" issue thread, so I would like to stress that there are issues I encounter on "other" technologies, that are far worse than seeing an "image" of myself on-screen :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on May 31, 2009 at 02:09 AM
Sure Carlo, Ill pm the settings to you maybe this afternoon :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on May 31, 2009 at 03:07 PM
Sure Carlo, Ill pm the settings to you maybe this afternoon :)

Thank you very much sir ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jun 01, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Pm sent! ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jun 01, 2009 at 02:29 AM
Pm sent! ;)

Got it boss, and YES they are very very good! I'm using the "normal" setting with my PV70 now along with my DVD player.

Salamat uli!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: arvin.poker on Jun 05, 2009 at 04:51 PM
any reviews sa mga nakabili na ng c10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: arvin.poker on Jun 10, 2009 at 10:41 AM
angat ko lang. wala pa po ba review sa mga nakabili na?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jun 10, 2009 at 02:37 PM
angat ko lang. wala pa po ba review sa mga nakabili na?

i'll let you know as soon as i get mine this week ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jun 12, 2009 at 12:17 PM
 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=17792.msg1015572#msg1015572

wish i could figure out how to tune the channels properly though...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: tailhook on Jun 14, 2009 at 10:03 AM
any reviews sa mga nakabili na ng c10?

i was thinking of making an extensive review of the 42c10. However, my untrained and inexperienced eye cannot point out the nuances of the set as to make it relevant to the average videophile. what I can give though is a general impression of the unit. i have owned a 32lx77 for almost two years now and thats the standard i will be using for my impressions.

finish and overall appearance - 42c10 is hands down way better. its piano finish and the new frame is a class above the boxy look of the 32lx77.

performance - hd - the 42c10 has a more natural feel to it. using 'warm' color temp, skin tone is quite accurate (again to my untrained eye).  although not as bright and loud as the 32lx77, the pictures come off as more believable. and no, the slightly lower native resolution to the lcd does not show at all.

sd - this is were the 42c10 blows away my 32lx77. for want of a better term, id call sd movies 'semi-hd'. its that good. the blacks are quite solid - no noise, pixelation or other artifacts. although this is probably dictated in part to the type of file one is using. unlike the 32lx77, sometimes i'd ask myself if its hd or sd im watching. he he he. in comparison, watching sd content with my lcd, the colors are garish and the blacks are not accurately resolved. there's color banding and lots of shadow detail are lost. not so with the 42c10.


game performance - using killzone2, the 42c10 looks a lot better - displaying more depth and a more 'realistic' movie like soft picture. the shadows, in particular, and the colors come off as less 'cartoony', which is what i like - although some might argue that that shouldnt be the case, but thats just me.
the 32lx77 is more grainy, but gives a little more detail. no issues as to judder or lag.

on the reflective screen - it is a bit more reflective than the lcd, BUT its not much of a bother. I just had to use thicker and darker curtains. overall, the improvements in picture quality more than make up for this small issue.

for all those who are having second thoughts on jumping from lcd to plasma - make the jump! its awesome!

a few questions for the experts though - is it really necessary to stick to that 100 hour burn in mark? how can i tell if the set is using 24p on the material (honestly i dont know and i cant tell what this is).
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jun 14, 2009 at 11:50 AM
I upgraded from Panasonic 42PV8 to 42C10. Parang lumiit yung screen maybe because of the slim frame compared to the 42pv8 na malaki yung frame. Regarding with the performance . Cant really tell hwat's the difference because they're both  picture perfect when matching mkv files.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: anchit on Jun 14, 2009 at 01:40 PM
I upgraded from Panasonic 42PV8 to 42C10. Parang lumiit yung screen maybe because of the slim frame compared to the 42pv8 na malaki yung frame. Regarding with the performance . Cant really tell hwat's the difference because they're both  picture perfect when matching mkv files.



plasma din ba bro ang C series? is this the counterpart of PV8 and PV7? and the X series is the PV80/70?

thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jun 14, 2009 at 02:05 PM
plasma din ba bro ang C series? is this the counterpart of PV8 and PV7? and the X series is the PV80/70?

thanks!
Yes boss plasma din sya..dapat nga kukunin ko is 42LZ because Full HD sya..pero ayaw ni commander..hari lang ako...alas sya..mas gusto nya PQ ng C10  ::)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: tailhook on Jun 14, 2009 at 02:34 PM
i did a side by side comparison between the lz80 and c10 at SnS before purchasing the latter. hands down walang sinabi yung lz80, especially sa SD content. plus the frame of the c10 is way classier!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jun 14, 2009 at 03:36 PM
i did a side by side comparison between the lz80 and c10 at SnS before purchasing the latter. hands down walang sinabi yung lz80, especially sa SD content. plus the frame of the c10 is way classier!

+1  ;D

Pede po ba makahingi ng correct settings for the 42C10 kung sino man meron..thanks
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: tailhook on Jun 14, 2009 at 03:59 PM
based on the calibration done at SnS, here is the recommended setting:

NORMAL
contrast  68
brightness +1
color +45
sharpness +51
tint +1
color balance Warm
color management Off
xV color Off


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jun 15, 2009 at 07:43 AM
Konting push pa ng budget, mas magandang deal yung 65K na PY800.    Sayang tong chance na to mga kaibigan!!!!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: james16 on Jun 15, 2009 at 09:45 AM
Konting push pa ng budget, mas magandang deal yung 65K na PY800.    Sayang tong chance na to mga kaibigan!!!!

full HD na kya ito? matanong ko lang ksi, i'm actually saving up in purchasing a tvpara mapalitan yung 32lx80. now i don't know yet kung woth it ba yung lz80 (full hd) or ito kunin ko or save more para sa full HD plasma. i'm still confused about the HD ready and Full HD advantages. hope you guys can help me out here

eventually ksi lilipat at bibili din ako ng dedicated blu-ray player at ps3 as well. at syempre gusto ko na ng tv na ika-nga bang for the buck (with features i need intact)

tia
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: avshop on Jun 15, 2009 at 10:02 AM
full HD na kya ito? matanong ko lang ksi, i'm actually saving up in purchasing a tvpara mapalitan yung 32lx80. now i don't know yet kung woth it ba yung lz80 (full hd) or ito kunin ko or save more para sa full HD plasma. i'm still confused about the HD ready and Full HD advantages. hope you guys can help me out here

eventually ksi lilipat at bibili din ako ng dedicated blu-ray player at ps3 as well. at syempre gusto ko na ng tv na ika-nga bang for the buck (with features i need intact)

tia

it's only hd ready but it looks better than most full hd sets out there.  if for movies, you won't see that much of a difference between hd ready and full hd.  you'll see more detail on video games on a full hd set if the game is capable  of 1080p. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jun 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM
full HD na kya ito? matanong ko lang ksi, i'm actually saving up in purchasing a tvpara mapalitan yung 32lx80. now i don't know yet kung woth it ba yung lz80 (full hd) or ito kunin ko or save more para sa full HD plasma. i'm still confused about the HD ready and Full HD advantages. hope you guys can help me out here

eventually ksi lilipat at bibili din ako ng dedicated blu-ray player at ps3 as well. at syempre gusto ko na ng tv na ika-nga bang for the buck (with features i need intact)

tia

PY800 is FULL HD Plasma.  Definitely higher grade than the new C or X series.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: james16 on Jun 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM
thanks, i'll definitely weigh my options.  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jun 15, 2009 at 12:14 PM
based on the calibration done at SnS, here is the recommended setting:

NORMAL
contrast  68
brightness +1
color +45
sharpness +51
tint +1
color balance Warm
color management Off
xV color Off




Thanks boss....
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: eksi on Jun 15, 2009 at 08:06 PM
PY800 is FULL HD Plasma.  Definitely higher grade than the new C or X series.

Yesterday sa The Link Makati, I compared PV80 and PY800
masyadong malapit for me ang quality, kung di kaya price ng full HD ayos na ayos talaga PV80 mas lalo na siguro yung improved non-full HD plasma (C and X series) :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: pantellica on Jun 15, 2009 at 09:47 PM
If you dont know much about TVs and dont know what to look for, then Carlo777 will help you. His reviews are all about what to look for when you are aiming for your dream TV. There is so much advice here. He gives tips on what to look for when inspecting a TV, things to do on a test drive and so on. Written in simple to understand format, I highly recommend everyone to read his review before you make your final TV purchase. Comprehensive advice.  :D
agree...thumbs up to carlo777..i'm one of his apprentice about flat tv's...he helps me a lot to decide what tv to purchase...may the force be with you!!! 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: acg419 on Jun 22, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Hi!
I just bought the viera 42C10 rather than 42lz80 (fullhd LCD) upon reading some reviews and review by carlo777 . BTW thanks for the picture settings! I also agree with carlo777 on his review on 42C10.
I was amazed on the PQ & performance of 42c10 by watching SD DVD "twilight" via component vdeo from my philips player. It was not that reflective even if I turned the lights on in my room but of course there is still some reflections because of the glass panel. Hindi ko pa sya nasusubukan sa HD since nde pa ko nakakabili ng popcorn nor WDTV.
Ask ko lang if desktops with HDMI out have the same pic quality & performance as of NMT Popcorn? I'm planning to purchase either of those.  A CPU desktop PC with video card 512mb-HDMI out only cost around 15k (w/o monitor) but will it hold against the popcorn in PQ? Please advise.

based on the calibration done at SnS, here is the recommended setting:

NORMAL
contrast  68
brightness +1
color +45
sharpness +51
tint +1
color balance Warm
color management Off
xV color Off



Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jun 22, 2009 at 03:48 PM
i've been burning in my 42pc10 for more than a week now...  been totally happy with it's PQ, then it hits me...  All my settings are low (40 for everything that's up to 100)  :o  i tried playing around with them today and all i can say is "wow". 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jun 27, 2009 at 04:30 PM
Bakit kaya wala tong PIP??
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jun 27, 2009 at 04:57 PM
Bakit kaya wala tong PIP??

The PIP is reserved for Panasonic high-end series TV. Will advise you the new models with PIP feature once they are available.  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: arvin.poker on Jun 27, 2009 at 09:19 PM
question lang sa mga guru's...

pano po mag-upscale ng dvd videos sa panasonic plama tv to 720 and 1080? di ko kasi sya makita sa manual and remote e.  kapag pinipindot ko kasi ang display eh laging 480 lang ang lumalabas.  may dapat po bang i-set sa tv? please help.

i'm trying to check kasi kung ano ang mas magandang mag-upscale between dvd player and the pana 42C10. 

thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jun 27, 2009 at 09:46 PM
question lang sa mga guru's...

pano po mag-upscale ng dvd videos sa panasonic plama tv to 720 and 1080? di ko kasi sya makita sa manual and remote e.  kapag pinipindot ko kasi ang display eh laging 480 lang ang lumalabas.  may dapat po bang i-set sa tv? please help.

i'm trying to check kasi kung ano ang mas magandang mag-upscale between dvd player and the pana 42C10. 

thanks!
whats the brand name and model number of your upscaler?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: eksi on Jun 27, 2009 at 10:02 PM
question lang sa mga guru's...

pano po mag-upscale ng dvd videos sa panasonic plama tv to 720 and 1080? di ko kasi sya makita sa manual and remote e.  kapag pinipindot ko kasi ang display eh laging 480 lang ang lumalabas.  may dapat po bang i-set sa tv? please help.

i'm trying to check kasi kung ano ang mas magandang mag-upscale between dvd player and the pana 42C10. 

thanks!

Bro imo the display is the signal fr source, any signal fr video source is upscaled automatically b d tv to its native reso.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: arvin.poker on Jun 29, 2009 at 08:53 AM
Bro imo the display is the signal fr source, any signal fr video source is upscaled automatically b d tv to its native reso.

thanks bro!

had the matrix and lotr trilogies last weekend and the PQ was awsome!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ditoy_eagle on Jul 02, 2009 at 02:11 PM
I haven't seen a direct comparison of this 42C10 to the X10 series. P15T kasi ang difference. I am thinking if sulit yung value added features ng X10 to this one.  Will just view SD DVD, SkyCable Digibox (notHD) and egreat movies, not so much Xbox/PS3 gaming. For this purpose same lang C10 and X10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 02, 2009 at 03:39 PM
Sabi sa avforums (UK) parehong-pareho lang daw, except for very minor differences such as eco mode, surround-sound simulation, side HDMI input, and PC input. 

Ang pinagtatalunan talaga nila yung anti-reflective coating lang, na meron daw sa X10, pero wala sa C10.

Sabi ni sir Carlo777, kahit may anti-reflective coating ang X10, reflective pa rin, so no big deal naman ang issue.

Sa akin naman, mas reflective talaga ang C10, pero duda ako kung talaga ngang walang AR sa C10.  Sa tingin ko, may AR din ang C10, pero yung old version lang.  Mas bagong version yung AR ng X10 kaya mas nabawasan ang reflections. 

But it's hard to confirm, since Panasonic does not publish clear AR differences in their specs.

Baka nga mas maganda pa ang AR ng C10, kasi pag nasobrahan sa AR, nagkakaroon ng epekto sa picture.

Parang LCD ng laptop monitor.  Yung mga BrightView (glossy) mas malinaw ang picture; yung mga ordinary screens mas malabo.  Yung mga high-end Samsung LCD TVs, mas malinaw yung mga glossy screens sa mga regular non-reflective screens. 

However, others say it's just a matter of personal preference.

Popular Mechanics on gloss vs matte LCD monitors:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/how_to/4213062.html

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 02, 2009 at 04:29 PM
Sabi sa avforums (UK) parehong-pareho lang daw, except for very minor differences such as eco mode, surround-sound simulation, side HDMI input, and PC input. 

Ang pinagtatalunan talaga nila yung anti-reflective coating lang, na meron daw sa X10, pero wala sa C10.

Sabi ni sir Carlo777, kahit may anti-reflective coating ang X10, reflective pa rin, so no big deal naman ang issue.

Sa akin naman, mas reflective talaga ang C10, pero duda ako kung talaga ngang walang AR sa C10.  Sa tingin ko, may AR din ang C10, pero yung old version lang.  Mas bagong version yung AR ng X10 kaya mas nabawasan ang reflections. 

But it's hard to confirm, since Panasonic does not publish clear AR differences in their specs.

Baka nga mas maganda pa ang AR ng C10, kasi pag nasobrahan sa AR, nagkakaroon ng epekto sa picture.

Parang LCD ng laptop monitor.  Yung mga BrightView (glossy) mas malinaw ang picture; yung mga ordinary screens mas malabo.  Yung mga high-end Samsung LCD TVs, mas malinaw yung mga glossy screens sa mga regular non-reflective screens. 

However, others say it's just a matter of personal preference.

Popular Mechanics on gloss vs matte LCD monitors:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/how_to/4213062.html



I agree sir, that it's really a matter of personal preference. Question lang about the "cross pattern" that is supposed to be a result of an anti-reflective coating. With or without it, I can't really distinguish the "level" of anti-reflection, for me they look very similar. Would we say that it was not really effective? Maybe, if I could see a plasma, an older plasma, that does not have this "coating" baka mas grabe yung reflection and we may appreciate this feature better.

Kamusta naman yung level of reflection ng plasma nila?

Thank you for the time.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: M@v3r1ck on Jul 02, 2009 at 04:36 PM
Hello,

I'm interested in the 42PV80 but since wala na ata stock, baka yung 42C10 nalang. If ever I purchase this, it will be used for HD/DVD and cable viewing only. I have a Samsung 40A650 LCD. I'm just wondering how this will compete with the Samsung 40A650?

Hello Boss Vic and Boss Jeff,

Can you send pricelist for the 40 inches and above for Plasma TVs?

Thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 02, 2009 at 04:40 PM
Hello,

I'm interested in the 42PV80 but since wala na ata stock, baka yung 42C10 nalang. If ever I purchase this, it will be used for HD/DVD and cable viewing only. I have a Samsung 40A650 LCD. I'm just wondering how this will compete with the Samsung 40A650?

Hello Boss Vic and Boss Jeff,

Can you send pricelist for the 40 inches and above for Plasma TVs?

Thanks!

Boss  M@v3r1ck,

I don't have a C10, but do have a 40A650 and a PV80/800. I made a comparison between the PY800 and the A650, I'll look for the link and post it here, for reference lang.

POST UPDATE:

Here it is:

http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=89925.30
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ditoy_eagle on Jul 02, 2009 at 04:45 PM
thanks sa inputs mga gurus! Sige mukhang sa C10 nalang ako if the PQ is basically the same! sayang din ang additional P15T, I usually watch in the dark naman so not a major issue ang new AR coating ng X10.

  
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 02, 2009 at 04:52 PM
thanks sa inputs mga gurus! Sige mukhang sa C10 nalang ako if the PQ is basically the same! sayang din ang additional P15T, I usually watch in the dark naman so not a major issue ang new AR coating ng X10.

  

Nice choice boss! Maganda naman yung C10 and for the 15k na saving, you can buy more for that^. We watch our plasma models (S10/PY800) in dimly lit rooms, and it was no longer an issue. Well reflection naman has never been a problem for me ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: M@v3r1ck on Jul 02, 2009 at 05:04 PM
Boss  M@v3r1ck,

I don't have a C10, but do have a 40A650 and a PV80/800. I made a comparison between the PY800 and the A650, I'll look for the link and post it here, for reference lang.

POST UPDATE:

Here it is:

http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=89925.30

Thanks Master Carlo! hahaha. Bilis sumagot. I 'm also thinking about the 50C10. But I believe that it's only HD Ready (1024x768) and I heard that you can only see the difference of HD Ready and Full HD if the screen is beyond 40 inches. Is this true? Or Maganda pa din ang quality kahit HD ready lang kapag 50 inches? Thanks in advance!=)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 02, 2009 at 05:11 PM
Thanks Master Carlo! hahaha. Bilis sumagot. I 'm also thinking about the 50C10. But I believe that it's only HD Ready (1024x768) and I heard that you can only see the difference of HD Ready and Full HD if the screen is beyond 40 inches. Is this true? Or Maganda pa din ang quality kahit HD ready lang kapag 50 inches? Thanks in advance!=)

I don't have a 50 inch T.V, but eto lang masasabi ko when I saw the 50PV80 for the first time. I said "WOW", and that comes from someone who already owns 2 very good 40 inch FULL HD models. Iba ang dating ng 50 inches sir! Baka nga mag 50 na din ako :D :D :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 02, 2009 at 05:27 PM
Question lang about the "cross pattern" that is supposed to be a result of an anti-reflective coating. With or without it, I can't really distinguish the "level" of anti-reflection, for me they look very similar. Would we say that it was not really effective?

When comparing reflectivity, look at the sharpness and brightness of the reflected image.

Yes, I think they're not very effective.  Reflectivity reduction is very slight, yet side-effects are visible.  

On the PV8, users usually see the cross-hatch pattern only when the TV is off.  But I've read one foreign forum post saying that he sometimes sees cross-hatch patterns while the TV is on, but only during very dark scenes.  



Kamusta naman yung level of reflection ng plasma nila?

My 2006 EDTV is very reflective.

In fact, the reflections are so bad that I initially thought there was no anti reflective coating at all.

But I suspected there was a small amount of AR because I noticed that the ambient reflections on the wall clock hanging above my TV was much worse.  On the wall clock, reflections are very sharp; on the TV, reflections are more diffuse and blurred.

I confirmed the presence of AR when I googled for additional descriptions.  For example, the following linked page says, "Features: Video noise reduction, Q-link, anti-reflection coating, Real MACH system, Real Black Drive System ".
http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/plasma-tv/panasonic-th-42pa60/

The good part is that my screen has absolutely no cross-hatch patterns.



Iba ang dating ng 50 inches sir! Baka nga mag 50 na din ako :D :D :D

Bosing, I'm now seriously considering a 50C10.  ;)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 02, 2009 at 05:47 PM
When comparing reflectivity, look at the sharpness and brightness of the reflected image.

Yes, I think they're not very effective.  Reflectivity reduction is very slight, yet side-effects are visible.  

On the PV8, users usually see the cross-hatch pattern only when the TV is off.  But I've read one foreign forum post saying that he sometimes sees cross-hatch patterns while the TV is on, but only during very dark scenes.  



My 2006 EDTV is very reflective.

In fact, the reflections are so bad that I initially thought there was no anti reflective coating at all.

But I suspected there was a small amount of AR because I noticed that the ambient reflections on the wall clock hanging above my TV was much worse.  On the wall clock, reflections are very sharp; on the TV, reflections are more diffuse and blurred.

I confirmed the presence of AR when I googled for additional descriptions.  For example, the following linked page says, "Features: Video noise reduction, Q-link, anti-reflection coating, Real MACH system, Real Black Drive System ".
http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/plasma-tv/panasonic-th-42pa60/

The good part is that my screen has absolutely no cross-hatch patterns.



Bosing, I'm now seriously considering a 50C10.  ;)



 :D Iba ang impact nya talaga sir!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: okidokjim on Jul 02, 2009 at 05:56 PM
mga sir malaki po ba lamang ng c10 sa pv80? kasi merong available na 50pv80 sa sm 18mos zero interest php90,900. magandang deal na po ba to? kasi yung 50c10 php97,080 kaso 12mos to pay lang. pls help. tnx
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 02, 2009 at 06:01 PM
mga sir malaki po ba lamang ng c10 sa pv80? kasi merong available na 50pv80 sa sm 18mos zero interest php90,900. magandang deal na po ba to? kasi yung 50c10 php97,080 kaso 12mos to pay lang. pls help. tnx

Nope bossing, the difference is not miles apart and you could try our sellers here namely Theatreworks or Sights and Sounds. Send a pm to Nemesis or e-reply they could give you reasonable prices.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: okidokjim on Jul 02, 2009 at 06:06 PM
Nope bossing, the difference is not miles apart and you could try our sellers here namely Theatreworks or Sights and Sounds. Send a pm to Nemesis or e-reply they could give you reasonable prices.


tnx sir. di na po kasi available sa kanila yung pv80 puro c10 na lang po available. mahal po ba sa php90,900 yung 50pv80? medyo natutukso na po ako kasi 18mos to pay.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 02, 2009 at 06:21 PM

tnx sir. di na po kasi available sa kanila yung pv80 puro c10 na lang po available. mahal po ba sa php90,900 yung 50pv80? medyo natutukso na po ako kasi 18mos to pay.

Not sure about the price sir, maybe others who got a 50PV80 could answer your question.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: okidokjim on Jul 02, 2009 at 06:23 PM
tnx sir.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: guido on Jul 02, 2009 at 06:52 PM
I haven't seen a direct comparison of this 42C10 to the X10 series. P15T kasi ang difference. I am thinking if sulit yung value added features ng X10 to this one.  Will just view SD DVD, SkyCable Digibox (notHD) and egreat movies, not so much Xbox/PS3 gaming. For this purpose same lang C10 and X10?

we are in the same boat my friend. been looking for comparison on these 2 online and all i see are the foreign sites.
panasonic malaysia has been updated. maybe our local c10 specs is same.
all the while i thought c10 has no pc input meron pala sya. have not look around in TW and SnS yet.
what is intriguing is that c10 and x10 has no AR filter. S10 yung meron

Siguro C10 na lang for my needs.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: emvi_2000 on Jul 02, 2009 at 06:58 PM
Was at TheaterWorks trinoma earlier and checked out the C10 and the X10. Sayang, they weren't side-by-side and playing the same content. Was supposed to get a 42LZ80 but sold out na as of yesterday afternoon. So in the same boat din ako if I should settle for a 42C10 na lang. BTW, the C10 is more reflective than the 42PV80 when i saw them at Avant. But that's no problem for me.  ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jul 02, 2009 at 08:37 PM
For price reference, here are the prices of Panasonic available:
50c10 at cash P85K
42X10 at cash P52K
42PV80 at cash P45K
42C10 at cash P43K
42LZ80 at cash P48K


All above models are available at Sights and Sounds 4th level Shangrila Plaza.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: M@v3r1ck on Jul 02, 2009 at 09:28 PM
Hello People,

If you were to choose between 42c10 and 42PV80, what will you choose?

Thanks! :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ditoy_eagle on Jul 02, 2009 at 10:32 PM
Good prices e-reply!  Maverick same boat tayo hehe, but remembering Carlo's observations, there is improvement with the newer C/X10 models.  Mas reflective lang a bit. 

The only way is to go to the store who has those 2 models, test them side by side and purchase the one you want after your testing.  Hmmm as for me kung P9,000 nalang pala difference ng X10 to C10, option ko na din yung X10.  Will just see for myself if there is a difference that would warrant the P9T difference.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: bebot santos on Jul 02, 2009 at 11:22 PM
HI mga gurus, just bought a 42PV8H last night but I didnt open it yet (hanap pa ng lcd rack) any reviews on this model?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ditoy_eagle on Jul 02, 2009 at 11:27 PM
I believe you bought the previous 2008 model, sana mura mo nakuha because the newer C/X10 prices just lowered as well.

Reviews here:
http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=80875.0 (http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=80875.0)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 03, 2009 at 07:00 AM

i have a 42pc10.  the unit has wonderful PQ and color.  ;)  but i do have to say that if you generally watch with lights on, the unit is definitely reflective.  i watch with the lights off so it isn't a factor for me  ;) one solution would be to diffuse any light source that might hit the unit directly...  like the cove light i had made for my previous room...

(http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2481/46/31/729851024/n729851024_1583173_5802075.jpg)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: okidokjim on Jul 03, 2009 at 04:11 PM
ano ba talaga mas ok 50pv80 or 50c10? pls help....
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 03, 2009 at 05:06 PM
ano ba talaga mas ok 50pv80 or 50c10? pls help....

Almost the same sila in-terms of picture quality, a very slight edge goes to the C10. The PV80 however, has 3 HDMI inputs compared to just dual inputs for the C10.

It would now depend on your budget, that said, you can't go wrong with either one.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: STI Edge on Jul 03, 2009 at 11:09 PM
just got a 50c10 from TW trinoma, ganda ng piq quality sulit! Thanks sir Carlo for the feedback on this unit.
Question lang po, kelangan pa po ba ulit i burn in to? Kindly share your setting for egreat movies pls. tnx!!!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 04, 2009 at 12:54 AM
just got a 50c10 from TW trinoma, ganda ng piq quality sulit! Thanks sir Carlo for the feedback on this unit.
Question lang po, kelangan pa po ba ulit i burn in to? Kindly share your setting for egreat movies pls. tnx!!!

Just to be safe, please do a break-in of the unit for the 1st 100 hours, you won't loose anything if you do. Just keep all your settings at the half mark.

Happy viewing!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: saling-pusa on Jul 04, 2009 at 11:29 AM
just got a 50c10 from TW trinoma, ganda ng piq quality sulit! Thanks sir Carlo for the feedback on this unit.
Question lang po, kelangan pa po ba ulit i burn in to? Kindly share your setting for egreat movies pls. tnx!!!

Magkano ang 50C10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jul 04, 2009 at 03:27 PM
Panasonic plasma TV available at Sights and Sounds 4th level Shangrila Plaza:

50c10 at cash P85K 5 units left

We provide FREE Spyder TV calibration for TV purchased from us.

Why Calibration?
To rely on a pre-set picture setting is a hit or miss affair.  To get the right picture, we use Spyder TV calibrator.

Most TV sets are shipped out from the factory with color, brightness and contrast turned up too high.  This creates unnatural pictures, plus of course, it could shorten the picture tube lifespan.  Using the Spyder calibration, we will be able to adjust your modestly priced TV into much detailed look and prolong your TV set’s life than a much more expensive set that has not been adjusted.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 04, 2009 at 04:15 PM
Is there any shop that has the 50C10 on display?

This afternoon, I went to Sights & Sounds and Listening in Style at Shang, then to Theaterworks Trinoma.  None of them had the 50C10 on display.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: STI Edge on Jul 04, 2009 at 09:43 PM
tried all settings to set to 40 and all normal (contrast, brightness  etc.) since am still breaking-in the unit with my egreat. Never thought that the piq would be vibrant even at these settings. It maybe it's just me pero thumbs up ako sa unit na to!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jul 05, 2009 at 02:48 AM
Is there any shop that has the 50C10 on display?

This afternoon, I went to Sights & Sounds and Listening in Style at Shang, then to Theaterworks Trinoma.  None of them had the 50C10 on display.

wow bro, jumping to 50" ?  ;D
i have no plans for upgrade this year but if you do, ill follow  ;) (prolly by december '09)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 05, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Hello People,

If you were to choose between 42c10 and 42PV80, what will you choose?

Thanks! :)


For me, the dealbreaker would be image retention. 

The PV series is confirmed to be prone to image retention, although members have reported that some specific units are less prone than others.   

The C10 series might be more IR-resistant, but the model is so new that there are no IR-related comments yet.



wow bro, jumping to 50" ?  ;D
i have no plans for upgrade this year but if you do, ill follow  ;) (prolly by december '09)

Lagi kasing kinakamusta ng in-law ko kung binebenta ko na raw ang old TV ko.  :D  Sabi ko, benta ko sa kanya pag may nagustuhan akong 50-inch na bago.

OK yata ang G10, but I lost interest nung nalaman kong may exhaust fans pala.

Next, pinag-isipan ko ang S10, but I also lost interest after boss Carlo's comments.  Ang lumalabas ay malabo yata ang image ng SD DVD sa 1080p sets.

Next, 50X10 naman kaya.  Hindi 1080p native ito; 1366 x 768 lang.  Pero wala pang available, e.

50C10 na lang kaya?  Available na, pero wala naman akong makitang display set na puwedeng pang-audition.

50PV80 na lang kaya?   ???  Kaya lang, takot ako e ... IR-prone daw ang 11th generation 2008 series.   :-\
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: kalash on Jul 05, 2009 at 02:38 PM
Sa naexperience ko sa PV series namin, burn in prone siya but not to the extent na IR. Hopefully di mangyari ang IR sa unit namin.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 05, 2009 at 04:00 PM
Sa naexperience ko sa PV series namin, burn in prone siya but not to the extent na IR. Hopefully di mangyari ang IR sa unit namin.

Sir, mas worse ang burn in (permanent), ang IR (temporary lang)...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: kalash on Jul 05, 2009 at 04:43 PM
Sir, mas worse ang burn in (permanent), ang IR (temporary lang)...

oh sorry, got confused between the two. May IR pa rin ang PV series even after the break in period sa unit. So is this issue really much less with the new gen models?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 05, 2009 at 07:35 PM
Sir, mas worse ang burn in (permanent), ang IR (temporary lang)...

That's right.  For the 2008 models, there are no burn-in problems, but IR is still an issue.



oh sorry, got confused between the two. May IR pa rin ang PV series even after the break in period sa unit. So is this issue really much less with the new gen models?

We don't know yet, sir.  We're still waiting for user comments for the 2009 12th gen models.

It will take some time before the comments come in, since there are very few owners as of now.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: james16 on Jul 05, 2009 at 08:06 PM
Is there any shop that has the 50C10 on display?

This afternoon, I went to Sights & Sounds and Listening in Style at Shang, then to Theaterworks Trinoma.  None of them had the 50C10 on display.


I saw the 50C10 on display sa SM makati po, katabi nya yung 50pv80, 42s10 at 42lz80
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 05, 2009 at 09:39 PM
Thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: james16 on Jul 05, 2009 at 09:42 PM
your welcome :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 05, 2009 at 09:55 PM
When comparing reflectivity, look at the sharpness and brightness of the reflected image.

Yes, I think they're not very effective.  Reflectivity reduction is very slight, yet side-effects are visible. 

On the PV8, users usually see the cross-hatch pattern only when the TV is off.  But I've read one foreign forum post saying that he sometimes sees cross-hatch patterns while the TV is on, but only during very dark scenes. 



My 2006 EDTV is very reflective.

In fact, the reflections are so bad that I initially thought there was no anti reflective coating at all.

But I suspected there was a small amount of AR because I noticed that the ambient reflections on the wall clock hanging above my TV was much worse.  On the wall clock, reflections are very sharp; on the TV, reflections are more diffuse and blurred.

I confirmed the presence of AR when I googled for additional descriptions.  For example, the following linked page says, "Features: Video noise reduction, Q-link, anti-reflection coating, Real MACH system, Real Black Drive System ".
http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/plasma-tv/panasonic-th-42pa60/

The good part is that my screen has absolutely no cross-hatch patterns.



Bosing, I'm now seriously considering a 50C10.  ;)



Ako rin sir barrister. Parang 50C10 na yata ang target kong pang upgrade sa PV70 ko. I was considering the 50S10 sana since full hd na but upon getting the price quote, its way too expensive compared to the 50C10. Like you I only watch dvds and cable but no hd stuff yet, and according to Carlo picture was not impressive when playing dvds on his S10. So now ipon mode muna and maybe before xmas makabili na din. ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: kalash on Jul 05, 2009 at 10:14 PM
Just seen this model awhile ago beside a PV80 and it is truly reflective but the good thing is it gives a glossy effect to the picture. So if you intend to place it in a brightly lit room maybe this model is not for you.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 05, 2009 at 10:37 PM
I think it will be fine in my case bacause our living room is not really well lit. In my current setup, the windows with curtains are located on the right side and not directly in front of the tv screen so there are only minimal reflections. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 06, 2009 at 11:06 AM
i know this doesn't sound like a very bright idea, but i've been trying very very hard to produce image-retention, through ps3 gaming and watching with my egreat m34a (black bars).  and i have, as of yet, been unable to do so. none whatsoever.  i did go through the 100-hour burn in ritual before attempting this of course.

a bummer for me is that i have realized that my eyes are apparently very sensitive to the infamous green phospors. i see them floating around even when the screen is blank/empty and all black :P  i know it sounds crazy, and maybe it's something else.  believe me i would welcome it being the latter case.  :P  all i know is i see small green dots and trails when i'm standing 5 feet in...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 06, 2009 at 11:24 AM
i know this doesn't sound like a very bright idea, but i've been trying very very hard to produce image-retention, through ps3 gaming and watching with my egreat m34a (black bars).  and i have, as of yet, been unable to do so. none whatsoever.  i did go through the 100-hour burn in ritual before attempting this of course.

You have a 42C10?  That's very useful information, sir.  I'm sure sir kalash appreciates the info too.



a bummer for me is that i have realized that my eyes are apparently very sensitive to the infamous green phospors. i see them floating around even when the screen is blank/empty and all black :P

OK lang yan, sir.  You'll get used to it after some time.

Pag tumagal yan, parang hindi mo na rin napapansin.  And on the very few instances when you do notice, you won't mind it very much anymore.

I'm actually glad that more members are now noticing phosphor lag.  2 years ago, I was the only one mentioning it, and my phosphor lag posts came and went without any comments from other members.

Other users in foreign forums have suggested that phosphor lag decreases as the unit gets more and more broken-in.  But I don't buy it.  Nasanay lang ang mata nila, pero hindi naman talaga nabawasan ang phosphor lag. 
 
In my case, I won't buy a higher-end plasma until after they resolve the phosphor lag issue.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 06, 2009 at 11:55 AM
I think it will be fine in my case bacause our living room is not really well lit. In my current setup, the windows with curtains are located on the right side and not directly in front of the tv screen so there are only minimal reflections. :)

Ok lang ang walang AR (anti-reflective) coating.  May problema rin yata pag may AR coating.

On 2008 models, some users notice faint cross-hatch lines. 

On the 50x1 (U.S. 2009), CNet editor David Katzmaier noticed faint diagonal lines:

"From seating distances closer than about 10 feet, we could make out a pattern of very faint, grayish diagonal lines that ran from the upper left to the lower right of the screen.

"...We described what we saw to Panasonic, and the company's engineer said he would get back to us with an explanation. Panasonic did send us a second TC-P50X1 when we asked for it, to make sure that the issue wasn't confined to our particular review sample. Both looked basically the same, and both showed the lines. No adjustment we could make eliminated the issue.
"

http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/panasonic-tc-p50x1/4505-6482_7-33490593.html

Nobody knows what's causing it, but it has been suggested that it's a side-effect of the AR coating.  It might depend on the way the ambient light falls on the screen, and/or the sensitivity of the user's eyes.

However, Panasonic has a different explanation (as quoted by Katzmaier):

Updated on May 28, 2009: The company got back to us with an explanation: "[Panasonic is] aware of the issue, but currently there is nothing that can be done to alleviate the lines. It is thought to be interference between the panel and front glass. At this time, a fix or software update to correct the phenomenon of the diagonal lines is not available. Engineers in Japan are continuing to study the phenomenon and investigate possible solutions and/or countermeasures."
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 06, 2009 at 12:02 PM
You have a 42C10?  That's very useful information, sir.  I'm sure sir kalash appreciates the info too.



OK lang yan, sir.  You'll get used to it after some time.

Pag tumagal yan, parang hindi mo na rin napapansin.  And on the very few instances when you do notice, you won't mind it very much anymore.

I'm actually glad that more members are now noticing phosphor lag.  2 years ago, I was the only one mentioning it, and my phosphor lag posts came and went without any comments from other members.

Other users in foreign forums have suggested that phosphor lag decreases as the unit gets more and more broken-in.  But I don't buy it.  Nasanay lang ang mata nila, pero hindi naman talaga nabawasan ang phosphor lag. 
 
In my case, I won't buy a higher-end plasma until after they resolve the phosphor lag issue.


I'm pretty sure I was one if not the first to get a 42pc10 among active posters.  ;)

http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=96467.msg1015616#msg1015616

I think I mistakenly attributed the phosphor issues to my egreat m34a, as I posted that it had "grainy" tendencies in the egreat thread... my point is somewhat supported by the fact that one of the more vocal critics of the m34a's grainy pq also used a plasma (pv80) with it.  I agree with you sir, I think it's all a matter of being in the right state of mind.  Ignorance is truly bliss, eh?  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 06, 2009 at 12:07 PM
I think I mistakenly attributed the phospor issues to my egreat m34a ...

Ok lang sir.  May pag-asa pa siguro ang phosphor lag issue sa 2009 models.

Sabi ni sir Carlo mas konti na ngayon ang phosphor lag sa 42S10 niya:

Phosphor Lag:

Seems like the S10, with a new panel has the clear advantage here, with those pesky green trails kept to a bare minimum, with the PY800 I could easily see those green ghosts while playing a vicious FPS game on my PS3. With the S10, I could still see it, but with some degree of effort already.



Ignorance is truly bliss, eh?  :D

Totoo yan.   ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: jetro on Jul 06, 2009 at 02:34 PM
a bit OT. Its upgrading time for me, I'll be coming from a 32 inc lcd 1080i samsung.  I am quite impressed with the 42pv80 when I auditioned it.  I heard 42c10 is also good and is now seriously considering it.

Naisip ko lang, since I will be upgrading why not go up a notch to 50 inch. BUT 50c10 is 85K vs 42c10 at 43K, thats almost double the price at 8 inch gain.  I haven't audioned the 50c10 but I am thinking, will the bigger screen justify the 40K++ increase in price?

what are your thoughts on this guys?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: blued888 on Jul 06, 2009 at 02:52 PM
If you really want the bigger screen area and money isn't a problem then 50-inchers are the way to go.

Otherwise I'd stick with one or two 42-inchers.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: reynold on Jul 06, 2009 at 03:03 PM
a bit OT. Its upgrading time for me, I'll be coming from a 32 inc lcd 1080i samsung.  I am quite impressed with the 42pv80 when I auditioned it.  I heard 42c10 is also good and is now seriously considering it.

Naisip ko lang, since I will be upgrading why not go up a notch to 50 inch. BUT 50c10 is 85K vs 42c10 at 43K, thats almost double the price at 8 inch gain.  I haven't audioned the 50c10 but I am thinking, will it the bigger screen justifies the 40K++ increase in price?

what are your thoughts on this guys?

If you have the money, then buy that 50 incher, the bigger, the better ;)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 06, 2009 at 03:03 PM
I haven't audioned the 50c10 but I am thinking, will the bigger screen justify the 40K++ increase in price?

what are your thoughts on this guys?


No, the P40K+ price is not justified.  For a mere 20% increase in diagonal size, you have to pay 100% more.

I suspect that for 50-inchers and higher models, mark-up is higher than for the low-end 42.

If you want the best value for your money, get the lowest-end 42-incher.  Maliit na lang siguro ang kinikita nila para sa ganyang model.

I asked about the 50C10 at Ansons Landmark.  Around P90K+.  I asked for a price-match at P85K.  Ok daw at P85K, basta cash.  Then I asked if they can price-match the 42C10 at P43K.  Hindi daw kaya, kahit cash pa.  

Pero wala namang masama sa ganoong pricing.  Legitimate marketing and pricing strategy lang yan.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jul 06, 2009 at 03:44 PM
Is there any shop that has the 50C10 on display?

This afternoon, I went to Sights & Sounds and Listening in Style at Shang, then to Theaterworks Trinoma.  None of them had the 50C10 on display.


Hello Sir, we still have not displayed the new 50C10 because of many units of TH50PV80, which we need to liquidate and dispose.

You should have ask the staff to show you the 50C10. We have around 6 units 50C10 that are kept in adjacent shop Paradigm Showroom. My staff can direct you to the Paradigm Showroom to audition this TV.  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: jetro on Jul 06, 2009 at 03:55 PM
thanks for the reply guys.  i'm in the same line of thinking as barrister, 40K+ increase in price does not justify the 8 inch increase in display size.

looks like its the 42c10 for me. although, I want to audition the 50c10 and see if it will "talk to me" :)

incidentally, while waiting for my wife last week, I saw a 'last unit' 42pv80 selling at ansons, 49K 18 months zero interest. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 06, 2009 at 04:03 PM
Hello Sir, we still have not displayed the new 50C10 because of many units of TH50PV80, which we need to liquidate and dispose.

You should have ask the staff to show you the 50C10. We have around 6 units 50C10 that are kept in adjacent shop Paradigm Showroom. My staff can direct you to the Paradigm Showroom to audition this TV.  :)

OK lang sir.  Your staff explained that the 50-incher will not fit in the showroom. 

And when I looked around, your shop is really stocked full!  Totoo naman na hindi na talaga kasya.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jul 06, 2009 at 08:03 PM
Lagi kasing kinakamusta ng in-law ko kung binebenta ko na raw ang old TV ko.  :D  Sabi ko, benta ko sa kanya pag may nagustuhan akong 50-inch na bago.

OK yata ang G10, but I lost interest nung nalaman kong may exhaust fans pala.

Next, pinag-isipan ko ang S10, but I also lost interest after boss Carlo's comments.  Ang lumalabas ay malabo yata ang image ng SD DVD sa 1080p sets.

Next, 50X10 naman kaya.  Hindi 1080p native ito; 1366 x 768 lang.  Pero wala pang available, e.

50C10 na lang kaya?  Available na, pero wala naman akong makitang display set na puwedeng pang-audition.

50PV80 na lang kaya?   ???  Kaya lang, takot ako e ... IR-prone daw ang 11th generation 2008 series.   :-\

ill prolly get a 720p variant if the price difference is over 10k.
regarding IR on 2008 series, i dont know if im just too blind to see it or i just know how to take care of my unit ;D
to be honest, i feel stupid everytime im watching movies with fast pace scene without seeing the phosphor lag; or leaving it on pause for 30 minutes then watching again without noticing any IR.   :-\
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 06, 2009 at 08:09 PM
regarding IR on 2008 series, i dont know if im just too blind to see it or i just know how to take care of my unit ;D

Suwerte ka siguro sir.  Baka maganda talaga ang unit mo.  Meron talagang PV na sobrang bilis daw magkaroon ng IR, even after a 100-hour break-in.



to be honest, i feel stupid everytime im ... leaving it on pause for 30 minutes then watching again without noticing any IR.   :-\

Pause for 30 minutes?  ...  Scary ...  :o

Bilib ako sa yo, bosing ... you have nerves of steel!  :o

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jul 06, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Suwerte ka siguro sir.  Baka maganda talaga ang unit mo.  Meron talagang PV na sobrang bilis daw magkaroon ng IR, even after a 100-hour break-in.
remember my 24 hour whitewash burn in procedure  ;D

Pause for 30 minutes?  ...  Scary ...  :o
Bilib ako sa yo, bosing ... you have nerves of steel!  :o
yeah bro 30 minutes paused
but after that long pause, i did finish the movie (must be the reason why i dont see it after) ???
panasonic said it's burn proof anyway (naniwala lang ako sa sinabi nila) :D :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: SpoonEK9 on Jul 06, 2009 at 11:15 PM
been thinking also of switching from 42PV80 to 50PV80 or 50C10. but i'm still hesitant since the price diff is about 40K.. with 40k, i can buy another 42 incher plasma.

kelan kaya bababa presyo ng 50PV80. sana bumaba around 65-70k hehe
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Nemesis91 on Jul 06, 2009 at 11:19 PM
better get the 50C10 sir if you looking for the 50pv80. :)

since the price of the 50C10 same na din sa 50pv80 b4. Going rate is 85k ;)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Nemesis91 on Jul 06, 2009 at 11:22 PM
If you really want the bigger screen area and money isn't a problem then 50-inchers are the way to go.

Otherwise I'd stick with one or two 42-inchers.

Agree ako dito! ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: amped on Jul 07, 2009 at 07:25 AM
When is the 50X10 coming out?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 07, 2009 at 08:36 AM
a bit OT. Its upgrading time for me, I'll be coming from a 32 inc lcd 1080i samsung.  I am quite impressed with the 42pv80 when I auditioned it.  I heard 42c10 is also good and is now seriously considering it.

Naisip ko lang, since I will be upgrading why not go up a notch to 50 inch. BUT 50c10 is 85K vs 42c10 at 43K, thats almost double the price at 8 inch gain.  I haven't audioned the 50c10 but I am thinking, will the bigger screen justify the 40K++ increase in price?

what are your thoughts on this guys?


No, the P40K+ price is not justified.  For a mere 20% increase in diagonal size, you have to pay 100% more.

I suspect that for 50-inchers and higher models, mark-up is higher than for the low-end 42.

If you want the best value for your money, get the lowest-end 42-incher.  Maliit na lang siguro ang kinikita nila para sa ganyang model.

I asked about the 50C10 at Ansons Landmark.  Around P90K+.  I asked for a price-match at P85K.  Ok daw at P85K, basta cash.  Then I asked if they can price-match the 42C10 at P43K.  Hindi daw kaya, kahit cash pa. 

Pero wala namang masama sa ganoong pricing.  Legitimate marketing and pricing strategy lang yan.


Yes I think the price is really not justified. In the US for example, the 42X1 is $800 (P38,400) while the 50X1 is $1100 (P52,800). A measly difference of only P14,400!!! :o

Bakit sa sellers sa atin you have to pay twice the price of the 42" to upgrade to a 50" equivalent?!? ::) >:(

Hays, kawawa naman tayong mga nagbabalak ng 50" na plasma, at their mercy na lang lagi.. :'(
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: cHess on Jul 07, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Nice Points bros.  2x (42 inch price) = 50 inch price...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 07, 2009 at 04:10 PM
Actually kung ganyan ang prices, better pa bumili na lang tayo ng 50 inches sa local market.  42 inches malayo pero at 50 inches, pareho na safer ka pa sa warranty.  Downside lang is that our friendly PDVD stores are more knowledgeable.

Hopefully mababaan yung prices ng gray 50 inch units to be consistent with the lower price of the smaller units. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: okidokjim on Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47 PM
Actually kung ganyan ang prices, better pa bumili na lang tayo ng 50 inches sa local market.  42 inches malayo pero at 50 inches, pareho na safer ka pa sa warranty.  Downside lang is that our friendly PDVD stores are more knowledgeable.

Hopefully mababaan yung prices ng gray 50 inch units to be consistent with the lower price of the smaller units. 

i agree with the 50''  kasi sa anson they can give 50pv80 85k for 18mos tapos 50c10 90k 18mos. pero pag sa 42'' mas mababa pa din sa pdvd stores.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jul 08, 2009 at 12:29 AM
Yes I think the price is really not justified. In the US for example, the 42X1 is $800 (P38,400) while the 50X1 is $1100 (P52,800). A measly difference of only P14,400!!! :o

Bakit sa sellers sa atin you have to pay twice the price of the 42" to upgrade to a 50" equivalent?!? ::) >:(

Hays, kawawa naman tayong mga nagbabalak ng 50" na plasma, at their mercy na lang lagi.. :'(

prolly because our distros priced it high, that's why our resellers here could'nt cut their price down :(
im pretty sure our resellers would lower their price if the source lowers it  ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 08, 2009 at 01:26 AM
prolly because our distros priced it high, that's why our resellers here could'nt cut their price down :(
im pretty sure our resellers would lower their price if the source lowers it  ;)

Yep its a possiblity nga. :)

Maybe our friendly pdvd sellers could enlighten us a bit re the reason behind the huge price gap between the 42 and 50 inch plasmas. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: STI Edge on Jul 08, 2009 at 02:01 AM
naisip ko din to before getting the 50c10 last week, halos dalawang 42" katumbas. kaya lang I really want a bigger screen. I'm buring in my unit using bluray while creating this post and allI can say is..........wow! worth it pero kung meron sana option where we can get a bigger screen for a cheaper price....panalo tayong lahat dito.

I hope walang maging hassle sa warranty claim and customer complaints for those who purchased  outside pdvd sellers.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: okidokjim on Jul 09, 2009 at 03:23 PM
gud pm. paano po ba ang tamang procedure ng pag break in ng c10? tnx po
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 09, 2009 at 03:47 PM
Break-in advice from my old post: http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=63765.msg667986#msg667986

From Panasonic FAQ:

4. What is the "break-in" period and what should I do during the break-in period to minimize any risk of image retention?
When your plasma TV is initially installed, the first 100 hours of use is known as the "break-in period." During this time, to minimize any risk of image retention, you should:

1. Make sure the plasma TV is in a viewing mode (aspect ratio) that completely fills the screen. The panel is shipped in this condition, in what is called the "Just" mode.
2. Turn down the Picture setting (in the Picture menu) to +0.
3. Briefly engage the 4:3 mode and confirm the side bars are set to "Mid", or "Bright". This can be adjusted in the Set Up menu.
4. Always return the display mode that fills the screen (such as Just, Zoom, Full, or H-FILL).
5. Try not to view channels with stationary backgrounds or logos for extended periods of time.
6. Avoid extended display of static images (video games, computer images, DVD title screens, etc.).  

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/PlasmaFAQ?storeId=15001&catalogId=13401&langId=-1&catGroupId=24973
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jul 09, 2009 at 03:54 PM
Yep its a possiblity nga. :)

Maybe our friendly pdvd sellers could enlighten us a bit re the reason behind the huge price gap between the 42 and 50 inch plasmas. :)


The prices of the TVs depend on consumers' demand. Since the bigger size TV has lesser demand than the smaller ones, the cost of manufacturing a bigger TV becomes more expensive.  :o
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 09, 2009 at 05:50 PM
I see, yes its very true here sa pinas mas maliit nga ang demand for bigger TVs. Well wishful thinking na lang sana price gaps between the 42 and 50 inchers would narrow down to about 15 to 20K na lang soon, just like in the US.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 09, 2009 at 06:45 PM
In Singapore, malayo rin pala ang price difference ng 50X10 sa 42X10 --- more than 100% higher!

At hardwarezone.com Singapore, a forum member said a 42X10 is SG$1,099 (P36,235.08):
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showthread.php?t=2234914&page=13.

Another member said a 50X10 is SG$2,599 (P85,697.57), net of NTUC Voucher:
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showthread.php?p=37538942
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 09, 2009 at 07:44 PM
Although mukhang the US is a better source.  The 50 inch G10 being sold by sir Vic is a lot cheaper than the PY800/850 and even 50S10.  Problem lang is the 110v.  The inconvenience naman might be worth the 20k saved especially since the g10 is a higher model than the py800/850 and s10 being sold.

Hopefully may market ito and the importers can experiment bringing in other US displays at cheaper prices than what we currently have, particularly for the bigger panels.  Baka 60k na lang lalabas sa US equivalent ng 50c10 (if they don't have the c10).   :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jul 10, 2009 at 07:55 AM
In Japan 1.4x-1.7x difference between a 42V and a 50V of the same model.     So hindi rin malapit.

And makers can manage to go deeper only on fast selling sizes - in plasmas case, that would be the 42V.  In LCDs case, that would be 32 or 37V.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 10, 2009 at 08:07 AM
In Japan 1.4x-1.7x difference between a 42V and a 50V of the same model.     So hindi rin malapit.

And makers can manage to go deeper only on fast selling sizes - in plasmas case, that would be the 42V.  In LCDs case, that would be 32 or 37V.

Sir clondalkin, what is the jap counterpart for the 50C10? Is it cheaper there or mahal din? Just curious.. ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jul 10, 2009 at 08:12 AM
Sir clondalkin, what is the jap counterpart for the 50C10? Is it cheaper there or mahal din? Just curious.. ;D

None.  They offer the X series only.  They did a similar thing last year when only the PV80 (PX80) was made available to the Japanese market.   

Tapos sa full HD line, we have G, V, Z and the new R series (V with built-in HDD).

Kung full HD, cheaper here but Japanese ang menus and channel frequency is not the same as that of US, Europe or Asia.  Kung 720p, oks na oks yung pricing nila Vic and Jeff - kaya worth tangkilikin.  Yeah I think wishful thinking na ma-price match with US.   Even the Japanese market cant offer HDTV at the same level of pricing as that of US even in the case of Made In Japan models.   
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 10, 2009 at 08:23 AM
None.  They offer the X series only.  They did a similar thing last year when only the PV80 (PX80) was made available to the Japanese market.   

Tapos sa full HD line, we have G, V, Z and the new R series (V with built-in HDD).

Kung full HD, cheaper here but Japanese ang menus and channel frequency is not the same as that of US, Europe or Asia.  Kung 720p, oks na oks yung pricing nila Vic and Jeff. 

Thanks for the info sir! Grabe pala variety ng models jan that I saw sa panasonic japan website! Built in hdd pa. :o

I'm planning to upgrade kasi to a 50C10 within the year and I still dont have any hd stuff to use, just regular dvds and cable. If I were to choose between the 50C10 and the 42py800, in your opinion what is the better buy in terms of pic quality and wow factor? ::)

OT, from the displays you've seen there, di pa ren ba kayang pantayan na panny ang kuro?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: babed95 on Jul 10, 2009 at 08:54 AM
nakita ko ngayon sa newspaper ina advertise na ng panasonic ang c and s series nila
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: babed95 on Jul 10, 2009 at 09:07 AM
nawawala naman talaga eh talagang may i.r pro pag play ka ulit ng movie pagkatapos wla na.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jul 10, 2009 at 09:52 AM
Thanks for the info sir! Grabe pala variety ng models jan that I saw sa panasonic japan website! Built in hdd pa. :o

I'm planning to upgrade kasi to a 50C10 within the year and I still dont have any hd stuff to use, just regular dvds and cable. If I were to choose between the 50C10 and the 42py800, in your opinion what is the better buy in terms of pic quality and wow factor? ::)

OT, from the displays you've seen there, di pa ren ba kayang pantayan na panny ang kuro?

If set properly, the 42PY800 should have better potential than the C series.  Do note that you are comparing a new entry level model and last year's upper-mid full HD model with higher quality panel.  Im not even sure if the engine of the new C series is at par with that of PY800 because the upgrade to the PY800 are the Neo PDP models.   Unless you've gotten used to the smooth image rendering of a 1080p panel, you wont likely have any issues with the fine (resolution) lines that seem to mask over the image on a 720p panel - that become more apparent as you sit closer.  It's the inherent limitation of the 720p panel but it's not as bad looking as my previous statement may have implied - not bad at all.   The minimum viewing distance where those lines are no longer visible is not that far anyways.

Would regular DVD and cable still be your main application?  720p panels tend to be more forgiving on the quality of signal than their 1080p counterpart.

Between these 2 models. the more lasting WOW factor would likely be due to the size of the screen, thus 50 is definitely an advantage, unless, you like sitting pretty close on the TV.

The Kuro?   Yes, it definitely remains the most impressive in terms of picture quality.   It's pretty easy to detect the superiority of the Kuro image over that of Viera image in a store, but the price and (to a certain extent) heat level of the Kuro are both issues for me.  Besides, its not at all a quandary to choose a reasonably priced very beautiful model over a very expensive "extremely" beautiful one.   The Kuro is most highly recommended if you can afford it.

In terms of LCD, Sharp still sets the highest standard in Japan but for some reason, that company is not as aggressive in offering their best products outside Japan.    It seems discrimatory that a company would only offer their most superior products in their own turf only.  Having said that, I have to commend Sony for their efforts to reach the farthest and remotest points in the earth.   And although I prefer the Aquos image over the Bravia image, I think that Sony's Motion Flow is one of the coolest effects Ive ever seen on an HDTV - I'm actually wishing something similar can be implemented on a plasma.   
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jul 10, 2009 at 06:41 PM
Great Deal For Our Friends and Valued Clients

Present your Sights and Sounds receipt at store counter and get a Sony AM/FM Walkman SRF84 for only P999. (suggested retail price P1999.).

(http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee128/ereply/srf84-1.jpg)

This is just a small way to say thank you for the business, you've shared with us over the years.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 10, 2009 at 11:56 PM
If set properly, the 42PY800 should have better potential than the C series.  Do note that you are comparing a new entry level model and last year's upper-mid full HD model with higher quality panel.  Im not even sure if the engine of the new C series is at par with that of PY800 because the upgrade to the PY800 are the Neo PDP models.   Unless you've gotten used to the smooth image rendering of a 1080p panel, you wont likely have any issues with the fine (resolution) lines that seem to mask over the image on a 720p panel - that become more apparent as you sit closer.  It's the inherent limitation of the 720p panel but it's not as bad looking as my previous statement may have implied - not bad at all.   The minimum viewing distance where those lines are no longer visible is not that far anyways.

Would regular DVD and cable still be your main application?  720p panels tend to be more forgiving on the quality of signal than their 1080p counterpart.

Between these 2 models. the more lasting WOW factor would likely be due to the size of the screen, thus 50 is definitely an advantage, unless, you like sitting pretty close on the TV.

The Kuro?   Yes, it definitely remains the most impressive in terms of picture quality.   It's pretty easy to detect the superiority of the Kuro image over that of Viera image in a store, but the price and (to a certain extent) heat level of the Kuro are both issues for me.  Besides, its not at all a quandary to choose a reasonably priced very beautiful model over a very expensive "extremely" beautiful one.   The Kuro is most highly recommended if you can afford it.

In terms of LCD, Sharp still sets the highest standard in Japan but for some reason, that company is not as aggressive in offering their best products outside Japan.    It seems discrimatory that a company would only offer their most superior products in their own turf only.  Having said that, I have to commend Sony for their efforts to reach the farthest and remotest points in the earth. And although I prefer the Aquos image over the Bravia image, I think that Sony's Motion Flow is one of the coolest effects Ive ever seen on an HDTV - I'm actually wishing something similar can be implemented on a plasma.   

Thank you very much sir clondalkin again for your insights re the 2 model comparison as well as your observations for other flat panel brands in japan. Ibang klase talaga pag guru ang nag compare and explain, galing! :o ;) The kuros are still #1 pala when it comes to PQ. I would agree with you on the sony, very cool motionflow tech, I see it all the time here in the office, ang ganda nga kaya IFC lang talaga ang habol ko sa py series. We are actually waiting for the latest xbr9 lcd tv we requested due to arrive soon as to update our agents on its latest features.

And for the panny, as long as dvd and cable stays sharp on a bigger screen, then it looks like its the 50c10 is for me. Besides, I'm already starting to feel a 42" is not that big anymore specially at a distance of 6 to 7 feet from our sofa. I think I'll be ok even w/o the IFC feature. There is still the 24p playback that can reduce judder for watching movies anyway. ;D I'll be joining the hd bandwagon probably by next year. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 13, 2009 at 02:31 PM
By the way, my wife and I agreed to sell off the ugly Sharp LCD, we have around the guest room and promptly ordered this model.

Since, I'll be spending some time with it, I may have to revise my initial impressions. And will probably take some videos of the C10 to enhance the review.

I'll also look at the I.R issue, Phosphor lag - again, and the reflectiveness of the model, in a non-showroom environment.

Thanks Vic of Sights and Sounds for a smooth C.O.D transaction.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: emvi_2000 on Jul 13, 2009 at 02:49 PM
Will wait for your impressions/review again Carlo! Planning to get this unit if the 42LZ80 won't be  available anytime soon.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 13, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Will wait for your impressions/review again Carlo! Planning to get this unit if the 42LZ80 won't be  available anytime soon.

Sure, just waiting delivery.

Like I said, I'll throw some videos as well.

POST UPDATE: If you want me to slap a particular DVD movie just tell me and I'll see if I have it.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: emvi_2000 on Jul 13, 2009 at 04:07 PM
Carlo,

When I saw the 42c10 beside a Samsung Plasma, I noticed that the C10's screen looked darker. Even when we adjusted the brightness, that didn't seem to help. When it was beside a PV80 in another appliance store, same thing and the colors seemed more saturated than the PV80.  I saw more details in the PV80. I just don't know if it had to do with the cable or settings. My dad, who's going to use it, liked the C10, though. hehehe
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 13, 2009 at 04:16 PM
Carlo,

When I saw the 42c10 beside a Samsung Plasma, I noticed that the C10's screen looked darker. Even when we adjusted the brightness, that didn't seem to help. When it was beside a PV80 in another appliance store, same thing and the colors seemed more saturated than the PV80.  I saw more details in the PV80. I just don't know if it had to do with the cable or settings. My dad, who's going to use it, liked the C10, though. hehehe

Usually, that problem comes around when sources like a DVD player (Pioneer DV-410V) and the PS3 is set to FULL RGB.  Pictures do look darker with those settings, but when I set my sources to LIMITED RGB, you get more details and the over-all pictures don't look dark already.

I'll see if this is the case with the C10.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: jetro on Jul 13, 2009 at 04:28 PM
I was at Listening and Style and Sights and Sound last Friday for a quick audition of the 50c10.  Comparing the 42pv80 to the 42c10 I can't seem to find any difference.  Comparing the 50c10 to 42c10, that's where I had problems.. I really want the bigger screen although the 'barat' side of me can't seem to justify the price difference.  

Incidentally, sir E-reply showed me a 50pv70 that he still has.  The dilemma is....seing the 50c10 in the flesh make me value bigger size more than PQ (but of course I wouldn't settle for anything worst compared to the 42c10) but I find the selling price of 50c10 quite high (in 42c10 as reference).  I liked the price E-reply gave me for the 50pv70, but is the 50pv70 still a good buy 2 years after being introduced?  I can't seem to find much recent info on pv70, is it true that this model has no hdmi input?  ...any issues on this model? sorry for hi-jacking this thread a bit.

Back to the 42c10... I'm sold on this.  I'll just see in a couple of months if the 50c10 price will lower...if not then 42c10 it is :)

Pinoy DVD never fails to keep me informed.... thanks guys for all the inputs. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: emvi_2000 on Jul 13, 2009 at 04:31 PM
Thanks Carlo for that. Please do check!  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jul 13, 2009 at 04:39 PM
...  I liked the price E-reply gave me for the 50pv70, but is the 50pv70 still a good buy 2 years after being introduced?  I can't seem to find much recent info on pv70, is it true that this model has no hdmi input?  ...any issues on this model? sorry for hi-jacking this thread a bit.

Is it possible to post the price difference between the 50PV70 and the 50C10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 13, 2009 at 05:15 PM
I saw a 42S10 and 50C10 side by side at SM Makati.

Unfortunately, the audition was not very useful.  That's because the 42S10 used a composite cable connection, believe it or not  :P.  But the 50 C10 used an HDMI cable connection. 

Both units were dispaying a Panny BD demo disc simultaneously.  The 42S10 looked blurry, while the 50C10 looked OK. 

I requested a demo of the compressed single-layer SD DVD-R that I brought with me.  Same result.  42S10 was blurry; 50C10 looked OK. 

Anyway, at least nakita ko rin ang 50C10 in the flesh and in action.  Maybe the 50C10 would look better in a darker room and after some calibration.

Mahal pa rin sa SM, so I decided to close the deal for a 50C10 at Ansons Landmark at P85K.  Promised delivery is tomorrow.

Kung sa porma lang externally, mas pogi pa rin ang PV80.  The rounded edges of the C10 make it look cheap.
 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 13, 2009 at 06:06 PM
I saw a 42S10 and 50C10 side by side at SM Makati.

Unfortunately, the audition was not very useful.  That's because the 42S10 used a composite cable connection, believe it or not  :P.  But the 50 C10 used an HDMI cable connection. 

Both units were dispaying a Panny BD demo disc simultaneously.  The 42S10 looked blurry, while the 50C10 looked OK. 

I requested a demo of the compressed single-layer SD DVD-R that I brought with me.  Same result.  42S10 was blurry; 50C10 looked OK. 

Anyway, at least nakita ko rin ang 50C10 in the flesh and in action.  Maybe the 50C10 would look better in a darker room and after some calibration.

Mahal pa rin sa SM, so I decided to close the deal for a 50C10 at Ansons Landmark at P85K.  Promised delivery is tomorrow.

Kung sa porma lang externally, mas pogi pa rin ang PV80.  The rounded edges of the C10 make it look cheap.
 

Nice! I'm also waiting for the delivery of a 42C10.

Maybe, the blurry picture was the effect of the composite connection?

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dmaximus on Jul 13, 2009 at 06:08 PM
contemplating of getting one in a few months. thanks to bro DOM.  ;D
Thanks to those who shares their inputs. very very helpful.  ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 13, 2009 at 06:31 PM
Nice! I'm also waiting for the delivery of a 42C10.

I'm one of the many members waiting for another review from you.  ;)


Maybe, the blurry picture was the effect of the composite connection?

Yes, definitely.  That was what I meant. 

Because of that composite connection, I didn't get the chance to fairly compare the 2 models, even if they were already side by side.

I requested the sales guy to connect the 42S10 with HDMI.  Sabi niya, wala daw siyang extra HDMI cable, baka next week magkaroon.  :P

Really annoying.  I mean, who would demo a 1080p TV with a composite cable connection?   :( ??? >:(
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 13, 2009 at 06:40 PM
I'm one of the many members waiting for another review from you.  ;)


Yes, definitely.  That was what I meant. 

Because of that composite connection, I had no way of fairly comparing the 2 models, even if they were already side by side.

I requested the sales guy to connect the 42S10 with HDMI.  Sabi niya, wala daw siyang extra HDMI cable, baka next week magkaroon.  :P

Really annoying.  I mean, who would demo a 1080p TV with a composite cable connection?   :( ??? >:(


Baka mahal na talaga ang mga HDMI cord :D

Sir, what was the "deciding" factor that made you go C10 over the X10,S10 and even PV80?

@jetro

You can't go wrong with a PV70 as well, I used to have one and it can definitely hold it's own against newer models.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 13, 2009 at 07:22 PM
Baka mahal na talaga ang mga HDMI cord :D

Panasonic Phil. is doing a lousy job of marketing their plasmas in the Philippines. 

When I was at SM Makati, the Panny plasmas were easily the worst-looking TVs on the showroom floor. 

No kidding.  :(



Sir, what was the "deciding" factor that made you go C10 over the X10,S10 and even PV80?

1.  PV80 or PV8 - Takot ako sa IR e  :-[.  Some users say they don't have IR issues; some say IR appears too quickly.

2.  S10 - It's 1080p, but I intend to avoid BD and stick to SD DVD for a long time.  Many U.S. forum posters say that for SD DVD, 768p plasmas perform better than 1080p plasmas.  When you posted here that your S10 does not display SD DVD images well, I decided to cancel it from my short list.

3.  X10 - It's 768p, so it must be great for SD DVD.  But I can't find it anywhere, and I don't think it will be available in the Philippine market any time soon.  So that's the end of the X models for me.

4.  C10 - Also 768p.  Same panel and specs as the X.  And it's cheap.  ... Puwede!   ;)

         
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 13, 2009 at 07:46 PM
Panasonic Phil. is doing a lousy job of marketing their plasmas in the Philippines. 

When I was at SM Makati, the Panny plasmas were easily the worst-looking TVs on the showroom floor. 

No kidding.  :(



1.  PV80 or PV8 - Takot ako sa IR e  :-[.  Some users say they don't have IR issues; some say IR appears too quickly.

2.  S10 - It's 1080p, but I intend to avoid BD and stick to SD DVD for a long time.  Many U.S. forum posters say that for SD DVD, 768p plasmas perform better than 1080p plasmas.  When you posted here that your S10 does not display SD DVD images well, I decided to cancel it from my short list.

3.  X10 - It's 768p, so it must be great for SD DVD.  But I can't find it anywhere, and I don't think it will be available in the Philippine market any time soon.  So that's the end of the X models for me.

4.  C10 - Also 768p.  Same panel and specs as the X.  And it's cheap.  ... Puwede!   ;)

         

Nice bossing!

Will you do a break-in?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 13, 2009 at 07:48 PM
Yes, definitely.   

10 hours a day for 10 days = 100 hours.   ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 13, 2009 at 07:57 PM
Yes, definitely.   

10 hours a day for 10 days = 100 hours.   ;)

Ok, I intend to zoom out the Chanel logo's and leave it on (Cartoon Network) for 10 hours a day, so ten 10 days din kami :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: anchit on Jul 13, 2009 at 11:08 PM
Nice bossing!

Will you do a break-in?


Last time i checked, jeff has a 42x10.ü
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 14, 2009 at 02:47 AM
A recurring PM I get is almost always about the phosphor lag. Luckily, I still have the video I made about the lag, and took the liberty of uploading it on a Youtube account.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm63BEhHWUk

Hopefully, this will show you guys what to look for, and I'll also be taking a video of the lag on the C10, if it's as noticeable as it was on older models.

 ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 14, 2009 at 03:49 AM
Again, Im eagerly awaiting your comprehensive review together with plasma guru barrister on your new acquisitions.  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: juanch on Jul 14, 2009 at 09:51 AM
A recurring PM I get is almost always about the phosphor lag. Luckily, I still have the video I made about the lag, and took the liberty of uploading it on a Youtube account.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm63BEhHWUk

Hopefully, this will show you guys what to look for, and I'll also be taking a video of the lag on the C10, if it's as noticeable as it was on older models.

 ;)

Wow!! That's very eye-opening, thanks for the video Carlo.

I see the phospor but it did not bother me much, I'll have to see it in actual to really determine if it bothers me.  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 14, 2009 at 10:12 AM
I see the phospor but it did not bother me much, I'll have to see it in actual to really determine if it bothers me.  :)

That's right, you really have to see the TV in person before you can decide.

Remember that on the YouTube vid, you're not looking at the actual green trails --- you're merely looking at a video of the green trails.

If the video cam is introducing its own artifacts, the green trails as recorded on the YouTube vid might look worse than the actual green trails in real life.

But for those who have difficulty seeing the green trails, sir Carlo's YouTube vid is very helpful for the purpose of demonstrating, with reasonable accuracy, how the phosphor lag should look like.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: jetro on Jul 14, 2009 at 10:13 AM
Previously, I have decided on the 42c10, but after my brief audition of the 50c10 at listening in style and seeing it next to the 42c10 got me so confused.  The 50c10 looks bigger than 42c10 by more than 8 inches to me :) I really want it save for the price.

I'll be waiting for your review sir barrister.  also, that 85K price at ansons.. is it cash or on credit card (installment)?

sir carlo777... is it true that pv70 has no hdmi input?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM
The 50c10 looks bigger than 42c10 by more than 8 inches to me :)

Same here.  That 50 incher is one big mother ...  :o

The 50 is only 8 inches bigger diagonally than a 42.  But when side by side, the 42 is really dwarfed by the 50 in comparison.



also, that 85K price at ansons.. is it cash or on credit card (installment)?

Cash only, sir. 

Regular price is P90K+.  I asked if they can match the SnS price at P85K, and they immediately agreed, provided I pay in cash.

Maybe I should have started haggling at P80K ?   :D


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jul 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM
The 50 is only 8 inches bigger diagonally than a 42.  But when side by side, the 42 is really dwarfed by the 50 in comparison.

That's because a 50V panel is 1.44x bigger than a 42V one.   ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 14, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Well that explains it.

We're only looking at the diagonal size.  Total screen area pala is bigger by nearly half.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 14, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Wow!! That's very eye-opening, thanks for the video Carlo.

I see the phospor but it did not bother me much, I'll have to see it in actual to really determine if it bothers me.  :)

You're welcome boss!

POST UPDATE: barrister is right, the lag, actually looks worst on video then in real life.

Previously, I have decided on the 42c10, but after my brief audition of the 50c10 at listening in style and seeing it next to the 42c10 got me so confused.  The 50c10 looks bigger than 42c10 by more than 8 inches to me :) I really want it save for the price.

I'll be waiting for your review sir barrister.  also, that 85K price at ansons.. is it cash or on credit card (installment)?

sir carlo777... is it true that pv70 has no hdmi input?

PV70 has 2 HDMI inputs ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jul 14, 2009 at 02:26 PM
Hey Carlo, the video finally explains what phosphor lag is. Good work!  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dmaximus on Jul 14, 2009 at 02:54 PM
nakakatakot naman yung phosphor lag  :-\
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 14, 2009 at 02:57 PM
nakakatakot naman yung phosphor lag  :-\

Not really sir, like I said it looks worst on video than in real life.

By the way, the T.V used for the vid is a Panny PV70. I'll re-do it with the C10/S10.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 14, 2009 at 03:57 PM
Not really sir, like I said it looks worst on video than in real life.

By the way, the T.V used for the vid is a Panny PV70. I'll re-do it with the C10/S10.

hey carlo ;D  sorry di na kita natawagan last month, as i ended up buying a 42pc10 two days after our last pm conversation. :D  i had a chance to get a pv8 but i like how c10 has a higher-end look with it's piano black finish and the curved bezel.  i also was able to do a side by side of a 50pv80 and a 42pc10.  played a 720p movie file and it SEEMED to me that the c10 was able to show more shades of black than the pv80.  granted, the middle shades of blacks were more of a dark gray sometimes, but at least it theoretically can show more detail in that respect.   ;)  do you have an nmt?  i would love to get your feedback regarding the pq of current nmt's when paired with a pana plasma.  i have a theory about it but i'll wait til after you put it through it's paces so as to avoid influencing your evaluation even a little bit. ;)

oh, also, i first of course did the zoom/burn in 100 hour thing, and now have tried several times to create IR on purpose.  have yet to succeed.   ;D  i see the phospors alot though  :P
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: anchit on Jul 14, 2009 at 04:02 PM
before seeing the video, never ko pa nakita yung green phosphor lag.Im also using a pv70, have already logged approximately 3k hours, never ko pa sya nakita,dito lang sa video. and i think makikita mo lang sya pag hinanap mo talga eh, and thats not the intent naman when you watch a movie. ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 14, 2009 at 04:04 PM
hey carlo ;D  sorry di na kita natawagan last month, as i ended up buying a 42pc10 two days after our last pm conversation. :D  i had a chance to get a pv8 but i like how c10 has a higher-end look with it's piano black finish and the curved bezel.  i also was able to do a side by side of a 50pv80 and a 42pc10.  played a 720p movie file and it SEEMED to me that the c10 was able to show more shades of black than the pv80.  granted, the middle shades of blacks were more of a dark gray sometimes, but at least it theoretically can show more detail in that respect.   ;)  do you have an nmt?  i would love to get your feedback regarding the pq of current nmt's when paired with a pana plasma.  i have a theory about it but i'll wait til after you put it through it's paces so as to avoid influencing your evaluation even a little bit. ;)

oh, also, i first of course did the zoom/burn in 100 hour thing, and now have tried several times to create IR on purpose.  have yet to succeed.   ;D  i see the phospors alot though  :P

I have a WD media player that does not see much use. I guess you should tell me what I'd be looking for because, if you don't, I'd have to stick my face pretty close to the screen and my wife may just pull the national budget on my hobby :D :D :D

Cheers partner!

POST UPDATE:

Hello anchit!

I was not looking for the lag, when I got my 1st plasma, then I saw those trails and flashes. At first, I thought it may be a damaged screen, till barrister told me that it was a natural limitation of the technology.

 :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dmaximus on Jul 14, 2009 at 04:33 PM
Not really sir, like I said it looks worst on video than in real life.

By the way, the T.V used for the vid is a Panny PV70. I'll re-do it with the C10/S10.

ahh i just have to see it for myself. fir the mean time i'll wait for your review on the c10 and s10. maraming salamat sa iyong kasipagan broder carlo.  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 14, 2009 at 04:48 PM
ahh i just have to see it for myself. fir the mean time i'll wait for your review on the c10 and s10. maraming salamat sa iyong kasipagan broder carlo.  :)

Always best to do that, always best.

Will update the videos when done.

Thanks
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 14, 2009 at 11:27 PM
Same here.  That 50 incher is one big mother ...  :o

The 50 is only 8 inches bigger diagonally than a 42.  But when side by side, the 42 is really dwarfed by the 50 in comparison.



Cash only, sir. 

Regular price is P90K+.  I asked if they can match the SnS price at P85K, and they immediately agreed, provided I pay in cash.

Maybe I should have started haggling at P80K ?   :D




Haha... baka nga... but don't think about the price na.  Probably won't go much lower anyway.  Just enjoy your set.  Looking forward to hearing reviews from you and Carlo. 

Just wondering though... of course, the warranty is easier with local units, but do local installers know proper calibration methods?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: bukoy on Jul 15, 2009 at 01:11 PM
ang kagandahan ng PV80 comapared to C10 is ung access sa SD card which in in front of the TV also includes the HDMI and composite video input and head phone and also the manual buttons ung sa C10 sa side medyo may kahirapan cause you have to look at the side of the TV instead accessing it on front at isa pa may cover compared to C10 na expose which can accumulate dust. At ung anti-reflectiveness filter nawala nga sa C10 nakakatulong ung filter in my opinion. Saka mukhang heavy duty ang construction ng  PV70/80 compared to C10 in terms of raw material na ginamit....Kaya kung papansinin nyo mas mura ang starting retail price nya compared to PV70/80....Just sharing.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 15, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Hello guys!

Since my C10 has not yet been delivered and the fact that Vic already has a U.S G10. I asked him to hold my C10 purchase, til I get to see the G10 in action.

We live in a very difficult world ;)

Will keep you guys posted.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Jul 15, 2009 at 04:34 PM
Wow!! That's very eye-opening, thanks for the video Carlo.

I see the phospor but it did not bother me much, I'll have to see it in actual to really determine if it bothers me.  :)

yes, carlo did a number of videos already with the pv70 and pv80, alam ko i also did something for the py800. we just have to upload them.

Hello guys!

Since my C10 has not yet been delivered and the fact that Vic already has a U.S G10. I asked him to hold my C10 purchase, til I get to see the G10 in action.

We live in a very difficult world ;)

Will keep you guys posted.

confused? :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM
yes, carlo did a number of videos already with the pv70 and pv80, alam ko i also did something for the py800. we just have to upload them.

confused? :D

Not anymore, even though the G10 is really one of the best, if not the best Panasonic Plasma I've seen. The C10 will do the job it was intended to do, very well - A good replacement for the Sharp you purchased ;D ;D ;D

Videos as soon as the unit arrives ;)

@barrister

Thank you for the initial impression of the C10, where you able to check the I.R?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 16, 2009 at 12:54 PM
@barrister

Thank you for the initial impression of the C10, where you able to check the I.R?



No IR so far. 



ang kagandahan ng PV80 comapared to C10 is ung access sa SD card which in in front of the TV also includes the HDMI and composite video input and head phone and also the manual buttons ung sa C10 sa side medyo may kahirapan cause you have to look at the side of the TV instead accessing it on front at isa pa may cover compared to C10 na expose which can accumulate dust. At ung anti-reflectiveness filter nawala nga sa C10 nakakatulong ung filter in my opinion. Saka mukhang heavy duty ang construction ng  PV70/80 compared to C10 in terms of raw material na ginamit....Kaya kung papansinin nyo mas mura ang starting retail price nya compared to PV70/80....Just sharing.


It's safer to buy a PV80 at this point rather than a C10. 

The PV80's known issues are minor, but the C10 might have major issues that we're not yet aware of.

Kung sa materials and frame design, mas maganda pa rin ang PV80 para sa akin.  Mukhang cheap nga ang porma ng C10.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 16, 2009 at 01:06 PM


No IR so far. 



It's safer to buy a PV80 at this point rather than a C10.

The PV80's known issues are minor, but the C10 might have major issues that we're not yet aware of.

Kung sa materials and frame design, mas maganda pa rin ang PV80 para sa akin.  Mukhang cheap nga ang porma ng C10.


masyado yata talagang eccentric (corny)  ang taste ko hehe...  i picked the pc10 over pv80 from an aesthetic point of view precisely for the reasons that you and sir bukoy choose the earlier model...  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 16, 2009 at 01:09 PM

Hindi naman sir.  Personal preference lang yan.

Mas gusto ko ang sharp edges kasi it looks sleeker to me.

Yung iba naman mas gusto ang rounded edges kasi it looks more updated.  To them, sharp edges look old and boxy. 

Ang katapat ng C10 ay yung PV8.

Equivalent of PV8 is C10; equivalent of PV80 is X10; equivalent of PY800 is S10.  All of the higher models are new.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 16, 2009 at 01:13 PM
Hindi naman sir.  Personal preference lang yan.

Mas gusto ko ang sharp edges kasi it looks sleeker to me.

Yung iba naman mas gusto ang rounded edges kasi it looks more updated.  To them, sharp edges look old and boxy. 

Ang katapat ng C10 ay yung PV8.

Equivalent of PV8 is C10; equivalent of PV80 is X10; equivalent of PY800 is S10.  All of the higher models are new.


tama ka dyan sir, mahilig talaga ako sa curves  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 16, 2009 at 02:31 PM
Cross-posting:



Dumating na mga sir.  Break-in pa lang ako ngayon, aabutin ng 10 days (10 hours a day lang kasi ako mag-break-in e).

I'm happy with it so far.

First, the bad news:  Hindi perfect ang screen uniformity when displaying a full-white screen.   Pero slight lang naman ang imperfection, hardly noticeable even with a full-white screen on.

Otherwise, the picture is very good.  Black levels are amazing (but still not Kuro-amazing ;)), and saturation is satisfying.  Phosphor lag is reduced (meron pa rin, but the green trail is now very hard to see on this model).

Kuwentuhan ko kayo pag natapos ang break-in.



... how was the installation service of Panasonic Philippines?  May calibration/manual channeling service ba?  Did the unit come with a wall mount?


Delivery ng Ansons yon sir.

Ok naman ang delivery.  Delivery date was on the date promised.  Delivery guys were polite. 

No wall mount.  Pedestal stand only.  I think a wall mount bracket would have had an additional, separate charge.  But if I ordered one, they would have wall-mounted it for me for free.

No problem with installing the pedestal stand and setting it on top of my TV rack.  They seemed to know what they were doing. 

The problem was that they brought nothing but the TV.  No philips screwdriver (they used mine), no 3-prong grounding adaptor for the power cord (I had my own), no PAL adaptor for the broadcast TV input (I didn't have one).

No calibration service.  OK lang, since I didn't expect it anyway.

They would have set the TV channels, if only they brought along a PAL connector that they could have sold to me.  I would have gladly paid an overprice for a PAL connector and considered it a tip.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 16, 2009 at 02:52 PM
Cross-posting:





Delivery ng Ansons yon sir.

Ok naman ang delivery.  Delivery date was on the date promised.  Delivery guys were polite. 

No wall mount.  Pedestal stand only.  I think a wall mount bracket would have had an additional, separate charge.  But if I ordered one, they would have wall-mounted it for me for free.

No problem with installing the pedestal stand and setting it on top of my TV rack.  They seemed to know what they were doing. 

The problem was that they brought nothing but the TV.  No philips screwdriver, no 3-prong grounding adaptor for the power cord, no PAL adaptor for the broadcast TV input.

No calibration service.  OK lang, since I didn't expect it anyway.

They would have set the TV channels, if only they brought along a PAL connector that they could have sold to me.  I would have gladly paid an overprice for a PAL connector and considered it a tip.


So the delivery personnel were knowledgeable?  Experience ko from long ago with a Philips projection tv, delivery was made by a different person from the one who would calibrate and arrange the channels.  I guess that's the advantage of our friendly stores.  Yun nga lang, peace of mind talaga ang kapalit with the local warranty.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 16, 2009 at 03:00 PM
So the delivery personnel were knowledgeable? 

No, they weren't knowledgable.  They knew how to mount the pedestal stand and set up the broadcast TV channels, but that was it.




I guess that's the advantage of our friendly stores.

That's right.  The ordinary sellers cannot hold a candle to the knowledgability of SnS and Nemesis.




Yun nga lang, peace of mind talaga ang kapalit with the local warranty.

No, mas may peace of mind ka pa nga sa resident sellers natin. 

Browse around in the different threads here.  A customer has a complaint and requests a replacement, SnS & Nemesis replace the TV with another brand-new unit, no questions asked.

With other sellers, baka paiyakan pa bago palitan.  Repair-repair lang siguro kahit 1 week pa lang from the time of delivery.

The only reason why I bought from Ansons was because they were the ones who gave me an audition.  SnS and Nemesis did not have an available unit at the time, although mayroon na yata sila ngayon.

Nahiya na lang akong bumili sa iba kasi napagod na si Ansons sa akin.    ;D





Experience ko from long ago with a Philips projection tv, delivery was made by a different person from the one who would calibrate and arrange the channels.

For calibration, I recommend that it be done after break-in, since the picture will change slightly after initial use.

After break-in, the picture more or less stabilizes, so that would be a good time to calibrate.

If it is calibrated immediately when new, the picture will change slightly after the break-in period, then you will have to calibrate again.


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: raptor on Jul 16, 2009 at 04:14 PM
Cross-posting:

The problem was that they brought nothing but the TV.  No philips screwdriver (they used mine), no 3-prong grounding adaptor for the power cord (I had my own), no PAL adaptor for the broadcast TV input (I didn't have one).

No calibration service.  OK lang, since I didn't expect it anyway.

They would have set the TV channels, if only they brought along a PAL connector that they could have sold to me.  I would have gladly paid an overprice for a PAL connector and considered it a tip.



This is the difference with our sellers here in PDVD.  When I had my tv delivered by SNS, they delivered it on my preferred schedule, and have everything taken cared of - PAL connector, power adaptor, and even the basic setup and cable tv channel scanning.  They are very knowledgeable of the product, including giving the instructions on burn-in setup.

After a month, they came back to calibrate the unit.  Really great service.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 17, 2009 at 01:50 AM
The 42C10 arrived today, sorry for the delay, I'm a bit tired but tomorrow I'll have an updated video.

I hope to clear out the following that's still hanging from my PM box:

1)The Phosphor lag, is it still there? and if it is, how does it compare to the lag of the PV70/8/80 and the PY800?

2)Reflectiveness, just how reflective is this model?

3)PS3 performance

4)Dvd performance

People seem to be less interested in Blu-Ray, I wonder. ???

See you guys then.

Again my thanks to Vic and the Sights and Sounds crew for a hassle free transaction.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 17, 2009 at 02:00 AM
The 42C10 arrived today, sorry for the delay, I'm a bit tired but tomorrow I'll have an updated video.

I hope to clear out the following that's still hanging from my PM box:

1)The Phosphor lag, is it still there? and if it is, how does it compare to the lag of the PV70/8/80 and the PY800?

2)Reflectiveness, just how reflective is this model?

3)PS3 performance

4)Dvd performance

People seem to be less interested in Blu-Ray, I wonder. ???

See you guys then.

Again my thanks to Vic and the Sights and Sounds crew for a hassle free transaction.

I thought you guys decided to go 50C10 na after considering the 50G10.  Hehe.  Still 42 pala.  ;D

As for lack of interest in BD, I would think it has to do with cost.  BD players and media are quite expensive and a lot of people are also using NMTs. 

Anyway, rest up and enjoy your new toy.  While we are a demanding bunch, we wouldn't want to pressure you into releasing your review without letting you have your fun. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 17, 2009 at 02:21 AM
I thought you guys decided to go 50C10 na after considering the 50G10.  Hehe.  Still 42 pala.  ;D

As for lack of interest in BD, I would think it has to do with cost.  BD players and media are quite expensive and a lot of people are also using NMTs. 

Anyway, rest up and enjoy your new toy.  While we are a demanding bunch, we wouldn't want to pressure you into releasing your review without letting you have your fun. 

We're still going for a larger screen. The 42C10 will replace an abysmal Sharp LCD in the guest room, and the best part of this purchase was that my wife paid for it ;) ;) ;)

It was a freaking long day with a number of expats out to ruin my fun. I left them with my staff, they can drink the night away for all I care. Work can really mess up with your hobby ;)

POST UPDATE:

By the way, the C10 along with my S10 and PY800 has this option called Overscan on/off. Should this be on? I can't remember what this feature actually does.

Thanks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 17, 2009 at 10:10 AM
People seem to be less interested in Blu-Ray, I wonder. ???

Maybe because everyone assumes that rendering a good BD image is so easy that nobody's worrying about it.

The real challenge is rendering a good SD DVD image.  That's what gets people worried. 

What if you want to play Armageddon, a movie that's not yet available on BD?  How would the non-anamorphic SD picture look like?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Maybe because everyone assumes that rendering a good BD image is so easy that nobody's worrying about it.

The real challenge is rendering a good SD DVD image.  That's what gets people worried. 

What if you want to play Armageddon, a movie that's not yet available on BD?  How would the non-anamorphic SD picture look like?

Sure, I'll check that one. Any ideas on what the Overscan function does?

Thanks boss.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: bukoy on Jul 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM

People seem to be less interested in Blu-Ray, I wonder. ???


cguro pag selling  like hotcakes  na ang mga titles baka dumami na ang mahilig d2 medyo mahal pa kc. At  naka tulong ang mga upscaler dvds sa mga existing dvd titles  natin more like ala blue ray narin ang viewing experience.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 17, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Sure, I'll check that one. Any ideas on what the Overscan function does?

Thanks boss.

Thanks.  Non-anamorphic DVDs look really awful.  They were unwatchable on my old EDTV, and I have a feeling they'll still be unwatchable on any flat panel.


===================================


 
I haven't fiddled around with the overscan option yet.  I'll try it after my break-in period.  I'll just remind you what overscan is, then you decide whether the option should be on or off.

Overscan is the area of the image that exceeds the intended viewable frame's four sides. 

In the early days of broadcast TV, overscan was intended as an allowance for CRT display inconsistencies, to ensure that the screen is always completely filled.   

For modern flat panels, "overscan on" means that the TV screen will show only the safe portion, with the overscan portion cropped off.  "Overscan off" means that the TV screen will display the entire image, without any cropping. 

Take the example of a movie with a 1.85:1 aspect ratio.  A flat panel's frame has an aspect ratio of 16:9, equivalent to 1.78:1 (16 divided by 9), which is narrower than 1.85:1.

A 1.85 movie on a 1.78 screen with overscan will fill the entire screen.  The same movie on the same screen without overscan will have a thin black bar either above or below the picture, because the movie's aspect ratio is slightly wider than the display screen's aspect ratio.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jul 17, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Sure, I'll check that one. Any ideas on what the Overscan function does?


In laymen's brains, overscan zooms the image beyond the normal viewing limits of the panel.  Some people use this feature to get rid of unwanted channel ID or anything along the periphery of the image.  

But for PC use, it should be off as overscan degrades the IQ and makes the characters fuzzy.   For 1:1 pixel mapping, overscan must be set to zero.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: guido on Jul 17, 2009 at 04:40 PM
question lang for c10 owners
anu yung naka display na 4.5MHZ everytime i change channel?
and is that a correct setting.
thanks
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 17, 2009 at 04:55 PM
Yes sir, tama ang 4.5MHz.

That's the sound system.  4.5MHz is the sound carrier frequency for the NTSC analog video standard.   

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: guido on Jul 17, 2009 at 04:57 PM
salamat sir sa reply
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jul 18, 2009 at 01:50 AM
POST UPDATE:

By the way, the C10 along with my S10 and PY800 has this option called Overscan on/off. Should this be on? I can't remember what this feature actually does.

Thanks.
btw Carlo777 for the benefit of our htpc users, let me add that for htpc use i suggest that this option be off at first setup, cause it will cause issues with setting up  the scaling of the vga.  some lines or portion of the tv might not be filled out or might look like zoomed.
ill post some pics later for comparison later  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: emvi_2000 on Jul 18, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Waiting for the 42C10 review...I wonder if there's significant difference vs. the 42X10 to justify the price difference (display and stock sound system wise)....
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 18, 2009 at 03:01 PM
Video shots tonight, darn Internet connection cuts off my upload but it should be up later.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 19, 2009 at 03:23 PM
Took a video of the C10 but found it too grainy, it must be my lighting. Because of the video people may think that the C10 is grainy, but that's not the case. Just tell me if you guys want it posted despite the flaws, and I'll still upload it.

This is my take VS the PV80 so far:

Reflectivity:

I found out that the C10 is really reflective, to a point you'd need to have good lighting conditions. It does not have those "chicken wire" patterns, but if you're coming from a PV8 or 80 you may get a little bit distracted, as was my wife when she watched a blu-ray under normal lighting.

Dvd performance:

Mixed bag, and we're sort of divided here. While I prefer the sharper look of the PV80. My wife prefers the softer and deeper black defenition of the C10. Under normal lighting conditions the C10 does look darker than the PV80, maybe because much of the picture is drowned out by the reflections. Switch off all the lights and you'll begin to see the intricate details and the gorgeous blacks of the C10.

Phosphor Lag:

Great news! The C10 still has it, but not as "bad' as it was on the PV80 or the PV70.

Image Retention:

Are kidding me? Don't want to test this on my C10 and S10 extensively til break in is done. Right now they seem to be very mild compared to the PV80.

More to come.

POST UPDATE:

Sorry for the delay, Internet connection is pretty bad around my place today.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 19, 2009 at 04:10 PM
Phosphor Lag:

Great news! The C10 still has it, but not as "bad' as it was on the PV80 or the PV70.

Do the green trails appear on movies, or are the green trails visible only on video games?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 19, 2009 at 05:07 PM
Do the green trails appear on movies, or are the green trails visible only on video games?

So far I've only tested it with games. Can you give me a movie where the lags are most seen for me to test.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: wyattearp on Jul 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM
mga sir may white wash feature ba ang c10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM
mga sir may white wash feature ba ang c10?

No white wash feature on my 50C10.



So far I've only tested it with games. Can you give me a movie where the lags are most seen for me to test.


The worst I've seen is on I, Robot, Chap. 10, 25:11 to 25:38.  Look at the heads of the robots.

Chapter and time stamps are from the Philippine R3 version. 

On my 50C10, I can still see some phosphor lag on that scene, but it's so minimal that it's hardly noticeable.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Jul 20, 2009 at 01:35 PM
No white wash feature on my 50C10.




The worst I've seen is on I, Robot, Chap. 10, 25:11 to 25:38.  Look at the heads of the robots.

Chapter and time stamps are from the Philippine R3 version. 

On my 50C10, I can still see some phosphor lag on that scene, but it's so minimal that it's hardly noticeable.


check ko later, i know i have that dvd pa. so far ako i can see the lag, carlo naman thinks nabawasan na...for me the only plasma i've seen with a substantial improvement sa lag was the g10.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Jul 20, 2009 at 04:12 PM

Reflectivity:

I found out that the C10 is really reflective, to a point you'd need to have good lighting conditions. It does not have those "chicken wire" patterns, but if you're coming from a PV8 or 80 you may get a little bit distracted, as was my wife when she watched a blu-ray under normal lighting.


Hi Carlo, Comitatus,

Regarding "reflectivity" of the C10, did the AR feature of the X10 reduce this significantly?  I'm choosing between these 2 models & "reflectivity" might be a deciding factor.

Truly appreciate your inputs.

Thanks!   :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 20, 2009 at 04:54 PM
...for me the only plasma i've seen with a substantial improvement sa lag was the g10.

The G10 really sounds like a good one.

If they can make a 50G10 without cooling fans, then that will be my next TV.  Maybe they will be able to do it in a few years, and at a much lower price.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 20, 2009 at 06:11 PM
Hi Carlo, Comitatus,

Regarding "reflectivity" of the C10, did the AR feature of the X10 reduce this significantly?  I'm choosing between these 2 models & "reflectivity" might be a deciding factor.

Truly appreciate your inputs.

Thanks!   :)


For me it's more reflective than the PV8/80, but since it's something I can still live with, I'll have comitatus give her comments. She's more straight to the point when it comes to a negative aspect of a T.V.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Jul 20, 2009 at 06:33 PM
Pareho ba talaga ang C and X?  I just had a little bit of a glance at an X model this afternoon and I didnt notice anything bothersome about its reflectivity - just not too fond of the bezel design.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 21, 2009 at 07:11 AM
@barrister

Sir based on your new 50C10, what are your observations re the screen's reflectiveness? Is it worse than your previous 42"?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 21, 2009 at 09:46 AM
Yes, it seems slightly worse.

Too bad I don't have the two sets side by side, but as far as I can recall, this 50C10 seems slightly more reflective than my old 42" Panny EDTV.

On this 50C10, I think it's just plain glass, without any anti-reflective coating whatsoever.

But on image quality, this 50C10 is much better.  Here's a screenshot:

(http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5448/50c10.jpg)
Single-layer DVD-R

In real life, the actual image looks much better than this pic.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Jul 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Hi Carlo, Comitatus,

Regarding "reflectivity" of the C10, did the AR feature of the X10 reduce this significantly?  I'm choosing between these 2 models & "reflectivity" might be a deciding factor.

Truly appreciate your inputs.

Thanks!   :)


Hmmm...this is what my barkada jokingly said when she saw the t.v. "uy...you don't need a mirror na pala when you feel like being kinky".

medyo reflective siya talaga lalo na when you use it under normal lighting conditions. pag naka off or naka dim yung lights maganda naman siya.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Jul 21, 2009 at 01:38 PM
Hmmm...this is what my barkada jokingly said when she saw the t.v. "uy...you don't need a mirror na pala when you feel like being kinky".

medyo reflective siya talaga lalo na when you use it under normal lighting conditions. pag naka off or naka dim yung lights maganda naman siya.



Thanks Comitatus!

I guess it will be the X10 (with the AR) for me then, or the PV80 (kung aabot ako sa remaining units available).

Great inputs!   :)





Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 21, 2009 at 02:35 PM
Hmmm...this is what my barkada jokingly said when she saw the t.v. "uy...you don't need a mirror na pala when you feel like being kinky".

medyo reflective siya talaga lalo na when you use it under normal lighting conditions. pag naka off or naka dim yung lights maganda naman siya.


So I guess, for normal lighting conditions, not advisable.  However, for dedicated HT rooms, reflectiveness shouldn't be an issue.
Thanks Comitatus!

I guess it will be the X10 (with the AR) for me then, or the PV80 (kung aabot ako sa remaining units available).

Great inputs!   :)


Can anyone confirm if the X10 has AR?  Specs from panasonic seem to say that AR is nonexistent in both the C10 and X10. 

On the other hand, except for the reflectiveness issue, PQ especially blacks seem to have improved on the newer panels compared to the PV80?

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Jul 21, 2009 at 04:15 PM
So I guess, for normal lighting conditions, not advisable.  However, for dedicated HT rooms, reflectiveness shouldn't be an issue.
Can anyone confirm if the X10 has AR?  Specs from panasonic seem to say that AR is nonexistent in both the C10 and X10. 

On the other hand, except for the reflectiveness issue, PQ especially blacks seem to have improved on the newer panels compared to the PV80?



opo, for me it's a bit too reflective, even under normal lighting conditions. whenever lights are out naman...PLEASE PASS THE ZUCCHINI...ANG GANDA ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 21, 2009 at 04:46 PM
Yes, it seems slightly worse.

Too bad I don't have the two sets side by side, but as far as I can recall, this 50C10 seems slightly more reflective than my old 42" Panny EDTV.

On this 50C10, I think it's just plain glass, without any anti-reflective coating whatsoever.

But on image quality, this 50C10 is much better.  Here's a screenshot:

(http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5448/50c10.jpg)
Single-layer DVD-R

In real life, the actual image looks much better than this pic.

Hays, Im thinking twice na tuloy. :-\ Kaya pala ang init ng discussion nito sa AV forums in uk between the X10 and the C10.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Jul 21, 2009 at 05:34 PM
carlo made a crappy video of the 42C10 and this is not an actual representation of the plasma because our video is a bit grainy. The C10 is way way better in real life.
 
we tested the video with lights...

reflective

video without lights naman was a bit grainy, parang pirated dvd tuloy taken from a movie theatre. he'll re-do the video naman with a better camera.

for reference lang po siya: (you can check the ps3 portion to see that the green trails have been reduced)

i'll do the video naman for the py800 and S10 for more references

Update: VIDEO FIXED AND NOT BAD ALREADY

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 21, 2009 at 05:37 PM
Kaya pala ang init ng discussion nito sa AV forums in uk between the X10 and the C10.


The anti-reflective (AR) coating discussion at avforums is too simplistic.  Nobody there is discussing the possibility that a glossy screen could be better in some aspects than an AR-coated screen.

Matte screens cut down reflections, but they also lighten black levels and colors.

I notice the same thing from photograph prints to magazine covers to laptop monitors.  Glossy is reflective, but has deeper colors and blacker blacks.  Matte cuts down reflections, but it also washes out colors.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Windrider on Jul 21, 2009 at 07:37 PM
You know barrister,thats what I noticed. I know this is out of topic buts that what I notice between my 2 LCDs. One is Toshiba, whose screen is in matte finish and the Sony, whose screen is a little glossy.

The Sony gives out better intense colors compared to the matte finish Toshiba.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 21, 2009 at 07:48 PM
Medyo on topic na rin, kasi for the C10 model, the reflectivity is the single biggest issue.  ;)

Glossy screens on laptops are pretty common nowadays.  Mine is a cheap HP, also with glossy screen.

And those glossy screens on the MacBooks --- really gorgeous!  :o

 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 21, 2009 at 10:26 PM
I agree with the reflection observations, some find it irritating while others even find it sort of "classy". Best advise is to see it first.

C10 video without the reflections

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v0Y4BVNrDw

Very good color tones, not overpowering.
Great blacks
Minimal green trails.

Thank you and will do a full next week.

Hays, Im thinking twice na tuloy. :-\ Kaya pala ang init ng discussion nito sa AV forums in uk between the X10 and the C10.

I remember you have a PV70, the C10 is very good baka lang magulat tayo sir, dahil medyo malakas yung reflections. However, if you can get pass that issue then you have a winner here.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jul 22, 2009 at 07:20 AM
I remember you have a PV70, the C10 is very good baka lang magulat tayo sir, dahil medyo malakas yung reflections. However, if you can get pass that issue then you have a winner here.
i remember my cousin's PV70 is not that reflective.
cause iirc i was doing a movie marathon from 8am - 3pm (wayback early 2008), without complaining about screen reflections. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 22, 2009 at 11:27 AM
i remember my cousin's PV70 is not that reflective.
cause iirc i was doing a movie marathon from 8am - 3pm (wayback early 2008), without complaining about screen reflections. 

True! The "reflectiveness" of both the PV70 and PV80 is in a way negligible, but for the C10, you may start to consider or even believe why reflections of plasma is an issue with some people.

 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: akosininio on Jul 22, 2009 at 10:00 PM
Hi guys! My mom finally decided to take my advice and buy a plasma tv, we bought the P42C10 a while ago at Sights and Sounds. Thank you for all the stuff I read here.:D

(Sorry kung OT?) Kaso lang, medyo di ata satisfied nanay ko sa customer service ng Sights and Sounds, pag-uwi ko sabi niya masusungit at suplado daw mga staff ng SnS kanina sa kanya. Anyone experienced this before? Di ko alam yung buong storya pero mukhang di talaga natuwa nanay ko sa pagbili niya ng TV kanina (di ako kasama eh, may class kasi ako.). :-[

Anyway! Hope to hear some tips from you guys to get the most out of our TVs! :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: eksi on Jul 22, 2009 at 11:06 PM
Hi guys! My mom finally decided to take my advice and buy a plasma tv, we bought the P42C10 a while ago at Sights and Sounds. Thank you for all the stuff I read here.:D

(Sorry kung OT?) Kaso lang, medyo di ata satisfied nanay ko sa customer service ng Sights and Sounds, pag-uwi ko sabi niya masusungit at suplado daw mga staff ng SnS kanina sa kanya. Anyone experienced this before? Di ko alam yung buong storya pero mukhang di talaga natuwa nanay ko sa pagbili niya ng TV kanina (di ako kasama eh, may class kasi ako.). :-[

Anyway! Hope to hear some tips from you guys to get the most out of our TVs! :D

 ???bakit kayo bumili sa store na di nyo gusto ang service at di kayo natuwa ???
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 23, 2009 at 01:02 AM
Hi guys! My mom finally decided to take my advice and buy a plasma tv, we bought the P42C10 a while ago at Sights and Sounds. Thank you for all the stuff I read here.:D

(Sorry kung OT?) Kaso lang, medyo di ata satisfied nanay ko sa customer service ng Sights and Sounds, pag-uwi ko sabi niya masusungit at suplado daw mga staff ng SnS kanina sa kanya. Anyone experienced this before? Di ko alam yung buong storya pero mukhang di talaga natuwa nanay ko sa pagbili niya ng TV kanina (di ako kasama eh, may class kasi ako.). :-[

Paging sir Vic of SnS, hehe...  :D

I smell some spanking from the boss..  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: executor on Jul 23, 2009 at 06:36 AM
Hi guys! My mom finally decided to take my advice and buy a plasma tv, we bought the P42C10 a while ago at Sights and Sounds. Thank you for all the stuff I read here.:D

(Sorry kung OT?) Kaso lang, medyo di ata satisfied nanay ko sa customer service ng Sights and Sounds, pag-uwi ko sabi niya masusungit at suplado daw mga staff ng SnS kanina sa kanya. Anyone experienced this before? Di ko alam yung buong storya pero mukhang di talaga natuwa nanay ko sa pagbili niya ng TV kanina (di ako kasama eh, may class kasi ako.). :-[

Anyway! Hope to hear some tips from you guys to get the most out of our TVs! :D

Same experience, 2 days ago medyo suplado nga ung ibang staff, buti n lang nandun c john pagkatpos nya i-entertain yung 1 customer lumapit agad siya para audition ung 42C10, still undecided at this point kung PV80 or C10 kukunin ko, hinde ko pa kasi nakita yung PV80, but im planning to go back this sunday to decide which one to buy.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 23, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Paging sir Vic of SnS, hehe...  :D

I smell some spanking from the boss..  ;D

hehehe napapaisip tuloy ako kung sino sa staff yun...  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 23, 2009 at 01:58 PM

The anti-reflective (AR) coating discussion at avforums is too simplistic.  Nobody there is discussing the possibility that a glossy screen could be better in some aspects than an AR-coated screen.

Matte screens cut down reflections, but they also lighten black levels and colors.

I notice the same thing from photograph prints to magazine covers to laptop monitors.  Glossy is reflective, but has deeper colors and blacker blacks.  Matte cuts down reflections, but it also washes out colors.


i agree...  i was able to compare a pv8 and c10, and they both had excellent contrast, but the pv8's blacks were somewhat "gray"-er(???), for lack of a better term...

i'm just happy that i have a DIY blue backlight for the TV rack so i can watch movies on my pc10 with the lights off ;D

(http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs119.snc1/4868_107762661024_729851024_2081635_3159325_n.jpg)

(http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs119.snc1/4868_107762656024_729851024_2081634_2986034_n.jpg)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 23, 2009 at 02:11 PM
i agree...  i was able to compare a pv8 and c10, and they both had excellent contrast, but the pv8's blacks were somewhat "gray"-er(???), for lack of a better term...

i'm just happy that i have a DIY blue backlight for the TV rack so i can watch movies on my pc10 with the lights off ;D


Sir, sorry for my ignorance, but why do you need the blue backlight? 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 23, 2009 at 02:18 PM
Sir, sorry for my ignorance, but why do you need the blue backlight? 

personal preference really, gives a great accent to the plasma's PQ.  and honestly, from a practical standpoint, it is hard walking around in my room in absolute darkness...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 23, 2009 at 02:21 PM
personal preference really, gives a great accent to the plasma's PQ.  and honestly, from a practical standpoint, it is hard walking around in my room in absolute darkness...

Haha... thanks... akala ko papangit yung PQ kung walang ganon... dami rin kasi may mga backlight ngayon when I looked at the galleries.  I guess its a nice way of lighting up your room without having any reflections.  Nice set-up by the way... mukhang enjoy ka sa C10 mo.  Really considering this model too.

Thanks.  
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 23, 2009 at 02:27 PM
Haha... thanks... akala ko papangit yung PQ kung walang ganon... dami rin kasi may mga backlight ngayon when I looked at the galleries.  Nice set-up by the way... mukhang enjoy ka sa C10 mo.  Really considering this model too.

Thanks.  

di sa papangit sir, less strain on the eyes and to a degree helps you appreciate the pq more...

it's a great model... really great pq as long as you don't have direct lighting hitting it...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 23, 2009 at 02:56 PM
... dami rin kasi may mga backlight ngayon when I looked at the galleries.  

Try browsing web pages about bias lighting.  You might like it:

It didn’t take long at all to reap the benefits of bias lighting. In fact, it only took about half a movie before I was sold. Image quality did not change, but the big difference was eye strain. Your pupils dilate and constrict all the time if subjected to different levels of light. With a TV in a dark room, you go from a hot spot in the center of your vision with a bright scene, to pitch black. Eventually the muscles that control this will become fatigued, just like any other muscle in your body. Not only do my eyes usually get tired, but I start getting some nasty headaches as well. I tend to notice this normally about half way through a movie. Headaches were completely eliminated; in fact, my eyes never felt any strain at all, because even during dark movie scenes, there is enough light in the room, behind the display, that my eyes don't dilate. The level of comfort watching films was increased, allowing me to watch multiple films in one session, which before would result in some serious pain.

... Paul and I are definitely in agreement about the idea of bias lighting and the Ideal Lume products. In a hobby that is unfortunately plagued with gimmicks and scams galore, the Ideal Lume provides a very realistic improvement not only to the viewing environment, but to the onscreen image as well. If you have a direct view system of any kind, the Ideal Lume bias lighting is really a must have, and the benefits are instantly apparent.



http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_11_2/ideal-lume-lighting-5-2004.html

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 23, 2009 at 04:08 PM
by the way, fellow pc10 owners, how is the image retention of your units?  as previously stated, I have yet to see this manifest with mine...  
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 23, 2009 at 04:20 PM
Thanks for the backlight idea.  I was stupid enough to think that it was just aesthetics.  Will try to have one designed rin.  Hehe.   
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: acg419 on Jul 23, 2009 at 05:02 PM
Bro, I'm a fellow c10 user And you're right, it's a bit reflective in direct lighting. I'm planning to do the same lighting as yours. I would like to ask the wattage of the blue fluorescent?  Where did you buy the light and brand?  Thank you very much for a great contribution.

 
i agree...  i was able to compare a pv8 and c10, and they both had excellent contrast, but the pv8's blacks were somewhat "gray"-er(???), for lack of a better term...

i'm just happy that i have a DIY blue backlight for the TV rack so i can watch movies on my pc10 with the lights off ;D

(http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs119.snc1/4868_107762661024_729851024_2081635_3159325_n.jpg)

(http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs119.snc1/4868_107762656024_729851024_2081634_2986034_n.jpg)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: acg419 on Jul 23, 2009 at 05:04 PM
by the way, fellow pc10 owners, how is the image retention of your units?  as previously stated, I have yet to see this manifest with mine...  

I have not experience any image retention yet. My unit is about a month old.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: taillhook on Jul 23, 2009 at 06:10 PM
I have not experience any image retention yet. My unit is about a month old.


ZERO IR. playing PGR4 , watching movies with black bars and watching SD content like tour de france!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 23, 2009 at 06:27 PM
it's a t5 bulb sir, i got the smallest wattage available...  olsun brand i think...  i had it wired with a switch leading to an AC plug...  got some double-sided tape, and attached it to my av rack's spine facing the wall...

got mine from DIY Store Eastwood branch...  although it's usually available in similarly themed stores such as Ace, Handyman, Home Depot and Wilcon...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: iiinas on Jul 23, 2009 at 06:45 PM
Sir, sorry for my ignorance, but why do you need the blue backlight? 

i think its what philips termed as "ambilight". less eye strain when watching.  :)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: mujacko2002 on Jul 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM
OT lang po..

Mabuhay!

paano po nakabit sa likod yung blue light? yung light as in kulay blue talaga or actinic lighting? or pwede din ibang kulay?

thank you so much for any response.

Godbless

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jul 23, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Hi guys! My mom finally decided to take my advice and buy a plasma tv, we bought the P42C10 a while ago at Sights and Sounds. Thank you for all the stuff I read here.:D

(Sorry kung OT?) Kaso lang, medyo di ata satisfied nanay ko sa customer service ng Sights and Sounds, pag-uwi ko sabi niya masusungit at suplado daw mga staff ng SnS kanina sa kanya. Anyone experienced this before? Di ko alam yung buong storya pero mukhang di talaga natuwa nanay ko sa pagbili niya ng TV kanina (di ako kasama eh, may class kasi ako.). :-[

Anyway! Hope to hear some tips from you guys to get the most out of our TVs! :D

Just came to know about this issue. Can you inquire your mom if the staff is a woman or a man. This staff will be reprimanded once I get to identify him.

Thank you for giving us the feedback. Will definitely put my hand on this rude personnel.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: acg419 on Jul 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM
it's a t5 bulb sir, i got the smallest wattage available...  olsun brand i think...  i had it wired with a switch leading to an AC plug...  got some double-sided tape, and attached it to my av rack's spine facing the wall...

got mine from DIY Store Eastwood branch...  although it's usually available in similarly themed stores such as Ace, Handyman, Home Depot and Wilcon...

Thanks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Jul 24, 2009 at 11:25 PM
i agree...  i was able to compare a pv8 and c10, and they both had excellent contrast, but the pv8's blacks were somewhat "gray"-er(???), for lack of a better term...

i'm just happy that i have a DIY blue backlight for the TV rack so i can watch movies on my pc10 with the lights off ;D

(http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs119.snc1/4868_107762661024_729851024_2081635_3159325_n.jpg)

(http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs119.snc1/4868_107762656024_729851024_2081634_2986034_n.jpg)

the backlight is pretty cool, but doesn't your eye hurt when you play a bright/colorful game like...street fighter 4? it would look very well on a game room...nice :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Night_Crawler24 on Jul 25, 2009 at 12:32 AM
Sorry if OT... But i just wanna ask if this model is HD ready 1080p? Meaning, if i use it to play a SD dvd it will give me the native 720p and if i play BD using my ps3 is would upscale it to 1080p?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Jul 25, 2009 at 12:36 AM
Sorry if OT... But i just wanna ask if this model is HD ready 1080p? Meaning, if i use it to play a SD dvd it will give me the native 720p and if i play BD using my ps3 is would upscale it to 1080p?

it's an hd-ready 720p native t.v, but will also upscale your blu-rays to 1080p ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 25, 2009 at 02:10 AM
Sorry if OT... But i just wanna ask if this model is HD ready 1080p? Meaning, if i use it to play a SD dvd it will give me the native 720p and if i play BD using my ps3 is would upscale it to 1080p?

The native resolution of the C10 is 720p.

For SD source input resolutions of 480i, 480p and 576p, the tv will upscale the signal to 720p.

For HD resolution input of 720p, no upscaling or processing is done. If the PS3 is set to ouput a resolution of 1080i or 1080p, The tv will downscale the signal to 720p.

Therefore, the actual resolution of the picture you are viewing all the time will always be 720p regardless of the source you are watching, whether its a regular tv channel, dvd or even a 1080p bluray film.



Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jul 25, 2009 at 04:41 AM
Carlo777 and  barrister ygpm  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Night_Crawler24 on Jul 25, 2009 at 05:08 AM
The native resolution of the C10 is 720p.

For SD source input resolutions of 480i, 480p and 576p, the tv will upscale the signal to 720p.

For HD resolution input of 720p, no upscaling or processing is done. If the PS3 is set to ouput a resolution of 1080i or 1080p, The tv will downscale the signal to 720p.

Therefore, the actual resolution of the picture you are viewing all the time will always be 720p regardless of the source you are watching, whether its a regular tv channel, dvd or even a 1080p bluray film.

This really made me confiused...  ??? if that would be the case, then what is the HD ready 1080p Stands for? or what is the diffrence between HD ready 1080p with FULL HD? I believe that 42C10  is HD Ready 1080p right?

Applicable Scanning Format 525 (480)/60i, 525 (480)/60p, 625 (576)/50i, 625 (576)/50p, 750 (720)/50p, 750     (720)/60p,

1125 (1080)/50i, 1125 (1080)/60i, 1125 (1080)/24p (HDMI only), 1125 (1080)/50p (HDMI only), 1125 (1080)/60p  (HDMI only)  

I've trying to research on this, but I always get a mixed answer... :D

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 25, 2009 at 05:48 AM
This really made me confiused...   if that would be the case, then what is the HD ready 1080p Stands for? or what is the diffrence between HD ready 1080p with FULL HD? I believe that 42C10  is HD Ready 1080p right?

Applicable Scanning Format 525 (480)/60i, 525 (480)/60p, 625 (576)/50i, 625 (576)/50p, 750 (720)/50p, 750     (720)/60p,

1125 (1080)/50i, 1125 (1080)/60i, 1125 (1080)/24p (HDMI only), 1125 (1080)/50p (HDMI only), 1125 (1080)/60p  (HDMI only)

I've trying to research on this, but I always get a mixed answer...

HD ready sets - is for TVs with a native resolution of 1024 X 768 or 1366 X 768 = 720p panels / 1 meg

Full HD sets - is for TVs with a native resolution of 1920 X 1080 = 1080p panels / 2 megs

HD ready 1080p means that even if the tv is just a native 720p panel, it can accept all resolutions that you listed on top (from 480-1080) with 1080p 60 or 24hz being the highest resolution. However, for the actual image to be displayed on to the tv screen, the viera processor will process and recalculate the 1080p image to fit a lower resolution 720p panel, so what it does is downscale the resolution from 1080p to 720p. So when you watch a bluray movie and you press recall(status), it will show 1080p(source) but the picture you are actually watching is already a 720p downscaled image.


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Night_Crawler24 on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:11 AM
HD ready sets - is for TVs with a native resolution of 1024 X 768 or 1366 X 768 = 720p panels / 1 meg

Full HD sets - is for TVs with a native resolution of 1920 X 1080 = 1080p panels / 2 megs

HD ready 1080p means that even if the tv is just a native 720p panel, it can accept all resolutions that you listed on top (from 480-1080) with 1080p 60 or 24hz being the highest resolution. However, for the actual image to be displayed on to the tv screen, the viera processor will process and recalculate the 1080p image to fit a lower resolution 720p panel, so what it does is downscale the resolution from 1080p to 720p. So when you watch a bluray movie and you press recall(status), it will show 1080p(source) but the picture you are actually watching is already a 720p downscaled image.
.

Now I understand.. Thank  you so much sir...  ;)



Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 25, 2009 at 11:56 AM
The native resolution of the C10 is 720p.

For SD source input resolutions of 480i, 480p and 576p, the tv will upscale the signal to 720p.

For HD resolution input of 720p, no upscaling or processing is done. If the PS3 is set to ouput a resolution of 1080i or 1080p, The tv will downscale the signal to 720p.

Therefore, the actual resolution of the picture you are viewing all the time will always be 720p regardless of the source you are watching, whether its a regular tv channel, dvd or even a 1080p bluray film.


This is correct in principle, but allow me to add some more inputs:

The native resolution of the 42C10 is 1024 x 768, not 720p; the native resolution of the 50C10 is 1366 x 768, not 720p.

720p is source resolution (resolution of the input signal); 1024 x 768 and 1366 x 768 are native resolutions (the number of actual pixels on the panel).

The panel can only display an image that exactly fits its native resolution.  Before the panel can display an image, an input signal must first be scaled by the TV's internal scaler to the panel's exact native resolution.

Therefore, a 720p source resolution is not immediately displayed without internal processing.  Even if a 480i SD DVD  signal was already upscaled by the DVD player to 720p, the 720p signal must be further scaled by the TV to exactly 1024 x 768 or 1366 x 768 before it can be displayed.



This really made me confiused...   if that would be the case, then what is the HD ready 1080p Stands for? or what is the diffrence between HD ready 1080p with FULL HD? I believe that 42C10  is HD Ready 1080p right?

...

.. I've trying to research on this, but I always get a mixed answer...

That's a tough question.  

It's not the usual "HD Ready vs. Full HD" question; you want a distinction between "HD Ready 1080p" and "Full HD" ...  :o

There are actually 3 relevant terms:

1. Full HD - 1920 x1080 pixels

2. HD Ready - with minimum display resolution of 720 physical lines in wide aspect ratio

3. HD Ready 1080p - 1920 x1080 pixels, with the following additional requirements:

Accepted video formats are reproduced without distortion
Display 1080p and 1080i video without overscan (1:1 pixel mapping)
Display native video modes at the same, or higher, refresh rate
Analogue YPbPr HD input
Digital HDMI or DVI HD input
720p HD progressive (1280x720 @50 & 60 Hz)
1080i HD (1920x1080 interlaced @50 & 60 Hz)
1080p HD (1920x1080 progressive @24, 50 & 60 Hz)
The HDMI or DVI input supports copy protection (HDCP)


Yes, there is a distinction between Full HD and HD Ready 1080p.  However, the latter is actually a more stringent standard than the former.

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/11/HD_ready_1080p_logo.svg/190px-HD_ready_1080p_logo.svg.png)  (http://www.sony.lv/res/images/image/26/1205831227926.jpg)


I believe that 42C10  is HD Ready 1080p right?

The 42C10 is "HD Ready", but it's not "HD Ready 1080p".


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 25, 2009 at 05:19 PM
50" Panasonic Viera 50C10 review
(SD-DVD observations only)


============================================


Summary:  

- Good for SD DVD; good black levels and colors; good sharpness as long as the input is a good quality 720p/1080p signal.

- Very reflective glass; screen uniformity is not perfect.


=============================================



Intro

This is the lowest-end 50-incher from Panasonic's 2009 (12th generation) lineup.  There's a big price difference when compared with the 42C10's tag, but if you want a 50-inch 12th gen Panasonic, the 50C10 is as cheap as it gets.

The budget-category pedigree shows.  Picture adjustments are limited to the most basic controls.  No features such as pixel orbiters, whitewash or scrolling white bar.  

The sound from the built-in speakers are awful, but it must have been unavoidable because the designers wanted to maintain a very slim form factor to the TV frame.   To keep the bezel as slim as possible, the speakers are very small down-firing ones.  Expectedly, the sound is bad no matter what audio setting I choose.



Reflectivity & Uniformity

The biggest complaint about the C series is about the reflectivity.  The bad news is that it really is very reflective.  The glass looks like it's just plain glass, without any anti-reflective (AR) coating whatsoever.  But if it's any consolation, the good news is that if you'll be using this in a dark room, the omission of an AR coating could be contributing to a better picture with blacker blacks and deeper colors that would have slightly suffered otherwise.
 
My screen has a very faint horizontal line, about 1/8 of an inch tall, located at the top 1/3 of the screen, running across the entire width of the screen.  Not anything to worry about because it's so faint that it's only noticeable when a full-white screen is displayed.  In fact, even with a full white image on, it's still hard to see.  Nevertheless, it's still there, which is slightly disappointing, considering that my old 7th gen Panny EDTV displayed perfect screen uniformity with a full white image.

Other than those two negatives, this TV is truly amazing for the price.  



BI, IR, Phosphor Lag

This unit has no burn-in so far, and I'm willing to bet it's not going to have any during its entire lifespan.  No big deal, since nobody worries about burn-in these days anyway.

As for image retention (IR), I haven't seen any so far, either.  I'm too chicken to give it a torture test, but I have a feeling that this TV is not going to have any IR problems with normal use.

Older generations (around 6th and earlier) had problems concerning purple snakes/purple ants/magenta banding; "clay faces"; false contouring/solarization/posterization; etc.  As expected, this TV has none of those early-generation flaws.  

Green phosphor lag still exists on this TV, but this time it's hardly visible even on the most difficult video material.  My phosphor lag test scene is on I, Robot, Chap. 10, 25:11 to 25:38 (Chapter and time stamps are from the Philippine R3 version).  I can still see some phosphor lag on that scene, but it's so minimal that it's hardly noticeable.  The judder is still obvious on that scene (which is normal), but the phosphor lag is now so slight that less sensitive eyes can stare at that scene all day and still not notice.



Sub-Field Drive: Black Levels & Posterization

Black levels in a dark room are amazingly good.  Still not Kuro-amazing, but pretty close.  The 2009 Pannys could be using a better screen filter on the panel for a blacker black. No need to worry that the filter might crush the grays, since grayscale on this TV is also very good.

The 600 Hz sub-field probably works well, as it could be improving grayscale to compensate for the filter.  To get a Kuro-like infinite black level, Panny will have to install an even more enhanced filter; however, the 600 Hz sub-field might not be up to the task.  

The Kuros reportedly use an 840 Hz sub-field, which is probably the secret sauce for an infinite black level that still maintains grayscale, unlike the latest Panny line, which uses only a 600 HZ sub-field.  But considering the rumors that Pio's Kuro engineers are now working at Panny, it's reasonable to assume that Panny will be able to come up with an 840 Hz spec in the near future.  But as for now, the blacks and grayscales on this 50C10 are pretty impressive nonetheless.
  
Posterization is very low on this unit.  This is another aspect that was probably improved by the 600 Hz sub-field.  Any posterization that you might see on this TV is unlikely to be the fault of the TV, but caused by MPEG compression artifacts already present on the poorly-encoded SD DVD disc itself.



Scaling & Sharpness

Native resolution on this panel is 1366 x 768, standard for 50-inch HD ready plasma screens.  I recommend a viewing distance of more than 5 feet from the screen, since pixel structure will be visible at a distance closer than that.

(http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5448/50c10.jpg)
Single-layer DVD-R

In real life, the actual image looks much better than this pic.

I had a Philips 5986 DVD player connected via component video at 480p.  The picture was good, except that it seemed too soft to me.  I tried HDMI at 480p and 720p, but the image was still soft.  Thankfully, the picture looked sharp enough at 1080p HDMI.

I tried my old Pioneer 270 DVD player, which upscales to a maximum of only 1080i, to see what differences I would observe.  The image was soft at 480p component, 480p HDMI and 720p HDMI, with terrible-looking details.  Sharpness and details were acceptable at 1080i, but still not good enough.

I bought a cheap Pioneer 410 DVD player yesterday (P4,990) to see if there would be any improvement.  The image was soft at 480p component and 480p HDMI.  But at 720p and 1080p, the image is sharp enough.  Images on 720p and 1080p are indistinguishable --- on both resolutions, image is sharp; film grain rendition looks natural --- just the way I like it.

The good part is that the Pio 410 player passes BTB (blacker-than-black), even if it's such a low-end model.  This player uses a low-end Mediatek MT1389FE chip, but it's good enough for me (The Pio 610 player uses Mediatek MT1389XE, which is slightly better).

There's no way to know just how the TV's internal scaler handles input signals since that's a manufacturer's trade secret that we'll probably never know.  But based on my brief tests, my guess is that this TV's scaler is optimized at 1080p.  This means that any signal it receives is first upscaled to 1080p, then downscaled to the exact 1366 x 768 native resolution of the panel.  

If you feed it a 480p signal, the TV first upscales it to 1080p, then downscales it to 1366 x768 (The image is soft because the internal upscaler is not that good).  Feed it a good 1080p signal and all the TV has to do is downscale it to 1366 x 768 (The image is sharp enough).



Colors

Colors are very good.  The very good black levels undoubtedly help a lot in making the colors look even better. Color saturation is fine at a 36 setting (in a scale of 0 to 100), Cinema Mode.

The experts recommend the Warm color temperature at Cinema Mode, but I prefer the Normal temp, since at the Warm setting, the whites look too yellowish to me.  Cinema Mode works best in a dark room.  Use the Normal Mode if you have medium ambient lighting as the Normal Mode setting makes the image slightly brighter.  

Color accuracy looks fine to me.  I remember reading a review about red push and green push on another model from the 2009 series, but I don't notice that here.  Reds and greens look accurate enough.  



Conclusion:

If you want a cheap 50 incher that renders a good SD DVD image, get this TV and feed it the best upscaled 1080p signal you can find.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:14 PM
50" Panasonic Viera 50C10 review
(SD-DVD observations only)


============================================


Summary:  

- Good for SD DVD; good black levels and colors; good sharpness as long as the input is a good quality 720p/1080p signal.

- Very reflective glass; screen uniformity is not perfect.


=============================================



Intro

This is the lowest-end 50-incher from Panasonic's 2009 (12th generation) lineup.  There's a big price difference when compared with the 42C10's tag, but if you want a 50-inch 12th gen Panasonic, the 50C10 is as cheap as it gets.

The budget-category pedigree shows.  Picture adjustments are limited to the most basic controls.  No features such as pixel orbiters, whitewash or scrolling white bar.  

The sound from the built-in speakers are awful, but it must have been unavoidable because the designers wanted to maintain a very slim form factor to the TV frame.   To keep the bezel as slim as possible, the speakers are very small down-firing ones.  Expectedly, the sound is bad no matter what audio setting I choose.



Reflectivity & Uniformity

The biggest complaint about the C series is about the reflectivity.  The bad news is that it really is very reflective.  The glass looks like it's just plain glass, without ant anti-reflective (AR) coating whatsoever.  But if it's any consolation, the good news is that if you'll be using this in a dark room, the omission of an AR coating could be contributing to a better picture with blacker blacks and deeper colors that would have slightly sufffered otherwise.
 
My screen has a very faint horizontal line, about 1/8 of an inch tall, located at the top 1/3 of the screen, running acsross the entire width of the screen.  Not anything to worry about because it's so faint that it's only noticeable when a full-white screen is displayed.  In fact, even with a full white image on, it's still hard to see.  Nevertheless, it's still there, which is slightly disappointing, considering that my old 7th gen Panny EDTV displayed perfect screen uniformity with a full white image.

Other than those two negatives, this TV is truly amazing for the price.  



BI, IR, Phosphor Lag

This unit has no burn-in so far, and I'm willing to bet it's not going to have any during its entire lifespan.  No big deal, since nobody worries about burn-in these days anyway.

As for image retention (IR), I haven't seen any so far, either.  I'm too chicken to give it a torture test, but I have a feeling that this TV is not going to have any IR problems with normal use.

Older generations (around 6th and earlier) had problems concerning purple snakes/purple ants/magenta banding; "clay faces"; false contouring/solarization/posterization; etc.  As expected, this TV has none of those early-generation flaws.  

Green phosphor lag still exists on this TV, but this time it's hardly visible even on the most difficult video material.  My phosphor lag test scene is on I, Robot, Chap. 10, 25:11 to 25:38 (Chapter and time stamps are from the Philippine R3 version).  I can still see some phosphor lag on that scene, but it's so minimal that it's hardly noticeable.  The judder is still obvious on that scene (which is normal), but the phosphor lag is now so slight that less sensitive eyes can stare at that scene all day and still not notice.



Sub-Field Drive: Black Levels & Posterization

Black levels in a dark room are amazingly good.  Still not Kuro-amazing, but pretty close.  The 2009 Pannys could be using a better screen filter on the panel for a blacker black. No need to worry that the filter might crush the grays, since grayscale on this TV is also very good.

The 600 Hz sub-field probably works well, as it could be improving grayscale to compensate for the filter.  To get a Kuro-like infinite black level, Panny will have to install an even more enhanced filter; however, the 600 Hz sub-field might not be up to the task.  

The Kuros reportedly use an 840 Hz sub-field, which is probably the secret sauce for an infinite black level that still maintains grayscale, unlike the latest Panny line, which uses only a 600 HZ sub-field.  But considering the rumors that Pio's Kuro engineers are now working at Panny, it's reasonable to assume that Panny will be able to come up with an 840 Hz spec in the near future.  But as for now, the blacks and grayscales on this 50C10 is pretty impressive nonetheless.
  
Posterization is very low on this unit.  This is another aspect that was probably improved by the 600 Hz sub-field.  Any posterization that you might see on this TV is unlikely to be the fault of the TV, but caused by MPEG compression artifacts already present on the poorly-encoded SD DVD disc itself.



Scaling & Sharpness

Native resolution on this panel is 1366 x 768, standard for 50-inch HD ready plasma screens.  I recommend a viewing distance of more than 5 feet from the screen, since pixel structure will be visible at a distance closer than that.

I had a Philips 5986 connected via component video at 480p.  The picture was good, except that it seemed too soft to me.  I tried HDMI at 480p and 720p, but the image was still soft.  Thankfully, the picture looked sharp enough at 1080p HDMI.

I tried my old Pioneer 270 DVD player, which upscales to a maximum of only 1080i, to see what differences I would observe.  The image was soft at 480p component, 480p HDMI and 720p HDMI, with terrible-looking details.  Sharpness and details were acceptable at 1080i, but still not good enough.

I bought a cheap Pioneer 410 yesterday (P4,990) to see if there would be any improvement.  The image was soft at 480p component and 480p HDMI.  But at 720p and 1080p, the image is sharp enough.  Images on 720p and 1080p are indistinguishable --- on both resolutions, image is sharp; film grain rendition looks natural --- just the way I like it.

The good part is that the Pio 410 player passes BTB (blacker-than-black), even if it's such a low-end model.  This player uses a low-end Mediatek MT1389FE chip, but it's good enough for me (The Pio 610 player uses Mediatek MT1389XE, which is slightly better).

There's no way to know just how the TV's internal scaler handles input signals since that's a manufaturer's trade scret that we'll probably never know.  But based on my brief tests, my guess it that this TV's scaler is optimized at 1080p.  This means that any signal it receives is first upscaled to 1080p, then downscaled to the exact 1366 x 768 native resolution of the panel.  

If you feed it a 480p signal, the TV first upscales it to 1080p, then downscales it to 1366 x768 (The image is soft because the internal upscaler is not that good).  Feed it a good 1080p signal and all the TV has to do is downscale it to 1366 x 768 (The image is sharp enough).



Colors

Colors are very good.  The very good black levels undoubtedly help a lot in making the colors look even better. Color saturation is fine at a 36 setting (in a scale of 0 to 100), Cinema Mode.

The experts recommend the Warm color temperature at Cinema Mode, but I prefer the Normal temp, since at the Warm seting, the whites look too yellowish to me.  Cinema mode works best in a dark room.  Use the Normal Mode if you have medium ambient lighting as the Normal Mode setting makes the image slightly brighter.  

Color accuracy looks fine to me.  I remember reading a review about red push and green push on another model from the 2009 series, but I don't notice that here.  Reds and greens look accurate enough.  



Conclusion:

If you want a cheap 50 incher that renders a good SD DVD image, get this TV and feed it the best upscaled 1080p signal you can find.


Great review boss! Very very nice, so when is the next purchase? ;)

@ninjababez

Umm...I did not get any, you may want to resend that :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:19 PM
Great review boss! Very very nice, so when is the next purchase? ;)

Thanks bosing!

...  so when is the next purchase? ;)

Pag nagkaroon ng Asian equivalent ng 50G10 that runs cool without cooling fans!  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:23 PM
Thanks bosing!

Pag nagkaroon ng Asian equivalent ng 50G10 that runs cool without cooling fans!  :D

Pa share naman daw ng dvd settings sabi ni comitatus, pls pm her account lalang daw boss if you don't mind.

Thanks a lot!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:29 PM
Sure, PM ko later.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:32 PM
Sure, PM ko later.

One more thing bossing the DVD you recommended daw arrived already, and she is very excited to watch it. Eto nga sir, hindi na lalabas mamaya kasama ng barkada niya :D :D :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 25, 2009 at 06:41 PM
 :D :D :D!

Two titles yon.  Don't be surprised if you notice a melancholy countenance afterwards ...  both movies are extremely depressing ...  :'(
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: juanch on Jul 25, 2009 at 11:22 PM
Thanks for the in-depth review barrister

I appreciate it  ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 26, 2009 at 07:03 PM
the backlight is pretty cool, but doesn't your eye hurt when you play a bright/colorful game like...street fighter 4? it would look very well on a game room...nice :)

admittedly, due to space constraints, i have tried to integrate the ht, audio, game and bed room. ;D  most guest like it naman.

i had the same concern prior to installing the backlight.  pleasantly surprised that it actually lessened eye strain.  i don't have sf4(my combo-producing, button-mashing abilities have long deserted me.), but playing 2k9, cod4 and cod5, and ufc undisputed 2009, i found myself playing for longer periods. 2k9 would be the brightest of my games.  the rest are generally set in dark situations. still, to a degree, i believe it actually helps. i am biased though as i have an affinity for blue...  ;D

@barister
i share your opinion that the cinema mode makes everything yellowish.  for me this applies even with no light on. especially the whites.  but i have gotten used to it.
also share your hunch that it translates 1080p signals best.  i played a couple of dvd's at 720p and 1080i via hdmi out of curiosity. i bypassed my avr to get avoid any additional signal influence.  pq had a little more pixelization based on my untrained and admittedly paranoid eye.

to anyone wondering, i think the pc10 is a great match with the tosh xde500 upscaling dvd player.  provided you don't turn on the tosh's pq enhancement and set it to output 1080p.  
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: akosininio on Jul 26, 2009 at 08:37 PM
Has anyone tried connecting their laptop to the TV? I tried it a while ago but it doesn't work. I simply plugged the laptop to the TV using a VGA cable (I'm sure it's working properly, it's the one I use for my desktop), also tried pressing the function + projector (f6 ata, not sure) but it didn't work. Any steps I missed? ???
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 26, 2009 at 09:40 PM
@barister
i share your opinion that the cinema mode makes everything yellowish.  for me this applies even with no light on. especially the whites.  but i have gotten used to it.

Yes, the "Warm" setting on "Colour Balance" is supposed to give a yellowish temperature.  On the other hand, the "Cool" setting is supposed to give a bluish temperature.

Actually, a yellowish white will look white once your eyes adjust to it.  Maybe I should try the Warm setting for a longer period and see if I'll like it.  

The Warm setting (at Cinema Mode) is widely recommended, since it reportedly produces a color temperature closest to "D65".

D65 has a color temperature of approximately 6500K, the CIE standard illuminant representing overcast daylight in Western/Northern Europe.

I don't have any measuring equipment, so I don't know if the Warm setting really gives us a D65 or 6500K.  

But to my eyes, the Normal setting is already slightly yellowish, and it might already be a D65 or 6500K.  On the other hand, the Warm setting looks too yellow to me.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: iiinas on Jul 26, 2009 at 09:52 PM
Has anyone tried connecting their laptop to the TV? I tried it a while ago but it doesn't work. I simply plugged the laptop to the TV using a VGA cable (I'm sure it's working properly, it's the one I use for my desktop), also tried pressing the function + projector (f6 ata, not sure) but it didn't work. Any steps I missed? ???

did you put the lcd into the correct mode (ex. video 1, video 2, hdmi1, hdmi 2, pc). if you use the vga cable it should be in the pc mode then use the function f key to transfer laptop image to the panel.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 27, 2009 at 12:13 AM
Yes, the "Warm" setting on "Colour Balance" is supposed to give a yellowish temperature.  On the other hand, the "Cool" setting is supposed to give a bluish temperature.

Actually, a yellowish white will look white once your eyes adjust to it.  Maybe I should try the Warm setting for a longer period and see if I'll like it.  

The Warm setting (at Cinema Mode) is widely recommended, since it reportedly produces a color temperature closest to "D65".

D65 has a color temperature of approximately 6500K, the CIE standard illuminant representing overcast daylight in Western/Northern Europe.

I don't have any measuring equipment, so I don't know if the Warm setting really gives us a D65 or 6500K.  

But to my eyes, the Normal setting is already slightly yellowish, and it might already be a D65 or 6500K.  On the other hand, the Warm setting looks too yellow to me.


ditto sir.  i primarily like my yellow on tshirts...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Jul 30, 2009 at 07:51 AM
ditto sir.  i primarily like my yellow on tshirts...

Sirs Invinciible, Carlo777, Barrister, C10 Owners,

Care to post your settings?   :)

Would certainly help fellow C10 Owners!   :)

Thanks Bros!

Regards,
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Jul 30, 2009 at 07:25 PM
Just saw the C10 side by side with the pv80 at Avant trinoma this afternoon. I asked permission from the sales rep to turn off both TVs so I can compare their reflections.

After some careful scrutiny, my verdict is, the C10 is indeed more reflective between the two. The PV80's reflections looked darker and diffused just like the PV70 while the C10's looked quite bright and sharp as if it was just a plain glass panel with no AR at all. I shone my cel's photolight on both screens, looked very closely and noticed a very faint crosshatch pattern on both with very fine lines on the c10 as compared to the the pv80 which had thicker lines. :-\
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 30, 2009 at 07:43 PM
Sirs Invinciible, Carlo777, Barrister, C10 Owners,

Care to post your settings?   :)

I'll post as soon as I figure out what my Pio 410 DVD player's firmware version is.  

Settings will differ depending on the player used.  I'm thinking I should post the TV settings + player model + player firmware version.  



I shone my cel's photolight on both screens, looked very closely and noticed a very faint crosshatch pattern on both with very fine lines on the c10 as compared to the the pv80 which had thicker lines. :-\

Wow, that's great info.   :o   I gotta try that one.

The most logical-sounding theory used to be that the crosshatch pattern on the PV80 was caused by the screen's AR coating.  But since you've seen a cross-hatch pattern on a C10 (no AR coating), then I guess that's the end of that theory  :P.

If a cross-hatch pattern appears on a screen with plain external glass, then the cross-hatch pattern must be caused by something on the internal glass, such as a filter.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 30, 2009 at 08:03 PM
How bad is the reflectiveness of this TV?  Is it similar to CRTs wherein it would be difficult to have a window in front of it because of the glare and shadow from the sunlight, or is it worse?  Does it mean that LCD's or the PV80's AR make it ok to position a TV opposite a window?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Jul 30, 2009 at 09:12 PM
I'll post as soon as I figure out what my Pio 410 DVD player's firmware version is.  

Settings will differ depending on the player used.  I'm thinking I should post the TV settings + player model + player firmware version.  


Appreciate it Sir!

Kindly post it at the new thread I created "PinoyDVD TweakTV".

Regards  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 30, 2009 at 09:24 PM
How bad is the reflectiveness of this TV?  Is it similar to CRTs wherein it would be difficult to have a window in front of it because of the glare and shadow from the sunlight, or is it worse?  Does it mean that LCD's or the PV80's AR make it ok to position a TV opposite a window?

uh oh... this unit definitely is not for a room with windows. :-X  i can't say that the other units are ok for that position.  or any tv for that matter.  all i can confirm is that no, the pc10 is not ok with a window opposite it.  it'll turn into a tv/mirror hybrid...

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 30, 2009 at 09:43 PM
Appreciate it Sir!

Kindly post it at the new thread I created "PinoyDVD TweakTV".

Regards  :D


Already posted, sir.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 30, 2009 at 09:47 PM
How bad is the reflectiveness of this TV?  

Very bad.



Is it similar to CRTs wherein it would be difficult to have a window in front of it because of the glare and shadow from the sunlight, or is it worse?  

Similar to CRT.



Does it mean that LCD's or the PV80's AR make it ok to position a TV opposite a window?

Actually, that's a bad place for any TV.  

Comparatively, a plasma C10 will have specular reflections; a plasma PV80 will have diffuse reflections; but an LCD with a matte screen will be most resistant to reflections.



You might be interested in this:

(http://www.cinemaquestinc.com/img/NISTrpd.jpg)

http://www.cinemaquestinc.com/ive.htm


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 30, 2009 at 10:32 PM
Very bad.

Similar to CRT.

Actually, that's a bad place for any TV.  

Comparatively, a plasma C10 will have specular reflections; a plasma PV80 will have diffuse reflections; but an LCD with a matte screen will be most resistant to reflections.


Yeah bad place nga talaga.  Unfortunately no choice for a lot of bedrooms unless we position the TV perpendicular to the bed.  Saw the C10 kasi earlier.  Ganda nga talaga ng plasma.  However, there was no direct glare on it, so I couldn't notice it.  Kung sanay ka pa rin sa CRT, I guess you won't know any better but right now, with the bed against the window and my CRT facing the window, hirap manood during the day. 

LCD siguro talaga for this set-up. 

Thanks for all your help.  Hoping LCDs will at least be competitive with C10 price. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 30, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Yeah bad place nga talaga.  Unfortunately no choice for a lot of bedrooms unless we position the TV perpendicular to the bed.  Saw the C10 kasi earlier.  Ganda nga talaga ng plasma.  However, there was no direct glare on it, so I couldn't notice it.  Kung sanay ka pa rin sa CRT, I guess you won't know any better but right now, with the bed against the window and my CRT facing the window, hirap manood during the day. 

LCD siguro talaga for this set-up. 

Thanks for all your help.  Hoping LCDs will at least be competitive with C10 price. 

another way of solving this would be to buy or order custom blinds or roman shades that are very opaque.  i did this with my previous room.  95 or 98 percent daylight filtering if i remember correctly.the contact i got gave a good price so it wasn't so heavy an upgrade.  i also diffused my main light source via a cove light fixture.   what's funny is i was using an old crt tv back then.  ;D

sayang din sir, i have owned recent models of both an lcd and a plasma, and the pq of the plasma is definitely better.

some pics...

(http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2481/46/31/729851024/n729851024_1581844_6833039.jpg)


(http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2481/46/31/729851024/n729851024_1581845_1684851.jpg)


(http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2481/46/31/729851024/n729851024_1582704_5639256.jpg)


(http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-sf2p/v648/46/31/729851024/n729851024_1583123_5458900.jpg)


(http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2481/46/31/729851024/n729851024_1583173_5802075.jpg)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jul 30, 2009 at 11:23 PM
another way of solving this would be to buy or order custom blinds or roman shades that are very opaque.  i did this with my previous room.  95 or 98 percent daylight filtering if i remember correctly.the contact i got gave a good price so it wasn't so heavy an upgrade.  i also diffused my main light source via a cove light fixture.   what's funny is i was using an old crt tv back then.  ;D

sayang din sir, i have owned recent models of both an lcd and a plasma, and the pq of the plasma is definitely better.

some pics...


Thanks for the tip.  The thing is, I don't think I'd like the shades down every time I watch TV.  I guess sometimes we have to sacrifice quality for practicality.  Oh well... hehe.  Thanks again though. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Jul 30, 2009 at 11:46 PM
Thanks for the tip.  The thing is, I don't think I'd like the shades down every time I watch TV.  I guess sometimes we have to sacrifice quality for practicality.  Oh well... hehe.  Thanks again though. 


very well sir... goodluck. ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jul 31, 2009 at 10:47 AM
For TVs, the discussions are more one-sided, limited to an aversion for reflections.  But for laptops, there's a more balanced debate going on concerning glossy vs. matte; however, there are more users who prefer matte screens for laptops.

Related article on the issue of reflectivity for Mac notebooks:


Glossy or Not?

With the exception of the MacBook Pro, all of Apple’s notebooks are available exclusively with a glossy display. The benefit of a glossy display is an improved contrast ratio but the downside is it reflects more ambient light, particularly when you have an unusually strong light source (e.g. sitting in front of a window or being outside with the Sun).

With the MacBook Pro you have the option of either a glossy or anti-glare display, the question that remains is: which should you choose?

As you’d expect, the decision really falls upon your intended use for the notebook. Indoors, the glossy display was much nicer in my opinion. Blacks appeared blacker and the screen was much more pleasant to look at:


(http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/mac/Penryn/displays7.jpg)
Matte screen (left) vs. Glossy (right)

http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=3246&p=9
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 01, 2009 at 04:37 AM
Invinciible   nice blinds, curtain ???
how much did you get those and where? :D
 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 01, 2009 at 08:44 AM
Invinciible   nice blinds, curtain ???
how much did you get those and where? :D
 

thanks sir! unfortunately binenta na namin yung bahay na yan kasama yung kwarto at blinds. isang set nalang ang natira. ang galing, laging gabi sa karto ko. sa may marikina/cainta yung supplier ko. they make the roman shades to your specifications. they don't outsource. pati yung mechanism sila may gawa.  may tatlong ratings sila sa pagka-opaque ng fabric. range ng pricing is 120-150/sqft if i remember correctly.  you can reach Allan the owner at 6478447 or 5832723.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 01, 2009 at 01:05 PM
thanks sir! unfortunately binenta na namin yung bahay na yan kasama yung kwarto at blinds. isang set nalang ang natira. ang galing, laging gabi sa karto ko. sa may marikina/cainta yung supplier ko. they make the roman shades to your specifications. they don't outsource. pati yung mechanism sila may gawa.  may tatlong ratings sila sa pagka-opaque ng fabric. range ng pricing is 120-150/sqft if i remember correctly.  you can reach Allan the owner at 6478447 or 5832723.
thanks bro ^_^
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Aug 01, 2009 at 05:37 PM
Has anyone tried connecting their laptop to the TV? I tried it a while ago but it doesn't work. I simply plugged the laptop to the TV using a VGA cable (I'm sure it's working properly, it's the one I use for my desktop), also tried pressing the function + projector (f6 ata, not sure) but it didn't work. Any steps I missed? ???

Try setting the screen resolution to a lower setting...1024x600 yata...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 02, 2009 at 02:32 AM
admittedly, due to space constraints, i have tried to integrate the ht, audio, game and bed room. ;D  most guest like it naman.

i had the same concern prior to installing the backlight.  pleasantly surprised that it actually lessened eye strain.  i don't have sf4(my combo-producing, button-mashing abilities have long deserted me.), but playing 2k9, cod4 and cod5, and ufc undisputed 2009, i found myself playing for longer periods. 2k9 would be the brightest of my games.  the rest are generally set in dark situations. still, to a degree, i believe it actually helps. i am biased though as i have an affinity for blue...  ;D

awww...you don't play fighting games? I'm loving the new king of fighters 12. blue is one of my fav colors, that's why i was particularly attracted to your backlight.

about the reflections...come to think of it, a glossy picture looks classy :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 02, 2009 at 03:37 AM
awww...you don't play fighting games? I'm loving the new king of fighters 12. blue is one of my fav colors, that's why i was particularly attracted to your backlight.

about the reflections...come to think of it, a glossy picture looks classy :)

last fighting i got into really was tekken resurrection  i think... although i'm totally into sports fighting games... UFC and boxing!  I think my attention got redirected to fps games ever since the counterstrike craze back in my college days. ;D

i have a general rule for my bedroom, "if it isn't black, white or blue, it's not staying."  ;)

a lot of people find the pc10 a bit undesirable for the reasons i like it... but really, for me, the rounded bezel and gloss make it totally classy. ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: kalash on Aug 02, 2009 at 02:17 PM

Wow, that's great info.   :o   I gotta try that one.

The most logical-sounding theory used to be that the crosshatch pattern on the PV80 was caused by the screen's AR coating.  But since you've seen a cross-hatch pattern on a C10 (no AR coating), then I guess that's the end of that theory  :P.

If a cross-hatch pattern appears on a screen with plain external glass, then the cross-hatch pattern must be caused by something on the internal glass, such as a filter.

You could also try using a laser pointer pointing it to the panel and reflecting it on a wall. With our PV80, it produces an X mark.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 02, 2009 at 02:24 PM
Just saw the C10 side by side with the pv80 at Avant trinoma this afternoon. I asked permission from the sales rep to turn off both TVs so I can compare their reflections.

After some careful scrutiny, my verdict is, the C10 is indeed more reflective between the two. The PV80's reflections looked darker and diffused just like the PV70 while the C10's looked quite bright and sharp as if it was just a plain glass panel with no AR at all. I shone my cel's photolight on both screens, looked very closely and noticed a very faint crosshatch pattern on both with very fine lines on the c10 as compared to the the pv80 which had thicker lines. :-\

Nakita ko na din, hard to see, but it's there! The PV70 and 80 has thicker lines. The C10 has very thin lines, now that I see it, I see it all the time :D

@barrister&Invinciible

Can you guys see the pattern on your respective units already?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Aug 02, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Can you guys see the pattern on your respective units already?

Hindi pa rin, e.  :-[ 

I'm sure it's there, since two members already confirmed it.  But I don't know why I can't see it.    ???
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 02, 2009 at 03:45 PM
Hindi pa rin, e.  :-[ 

I'm sure it's there, since two members already confirmed it.  But I don't know why I can't see it.    ???

Sir, try looking at it with the lights on ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 02, 2009 at 03:48 PM
Nakita ko na din, hard to see, but it's there! The PV70 and 80 has thicker lines. The C10 has very thin lines, now that I see it, I see it all the time :D

@barrister&Invinciible

Can you guys see the pattern on your respective units already?

haven't tried... i'm afraid it'll be all i see once i find it hahaha...  maybe later tonight... just making the most of my ignorance as of this minute. ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Aug 02, 2009 at 03:55 PM
Sir, try looking at it with the lights on ;)

I've tried it, but I still don't see it.

I have 2 sets of ceiling lights in my video room: 4 recessed incandescent lamps (with dimmer); and 1 circular fluorescent lamp.

I tried all sorts of combinations: fluorescent only; incandescent only (bright and dimmed); both fluorescent and incandescent (bright and dimmed); all lights off; LED flashlight shining on the screen with ceiling lights on/off/bright/dimmed; etc.  ...

Still nothing.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 02, 2009 at 04:04 PM
I've tried it, but I still don't see it.

I have 2 sets of ceiling lights in my video room: 4 recessed incandescent lamps (with dimmer); and 1 circular fluorescent lamp.

I tried all sorts of combinations: fluorescent only; incandescent only (bright and dimmed); both fluorescent and incandescent (bright and dimmed); all lights off; LED flashlight shining on the screen with ceiling lights on/off/bright/dimmed; etc.  ...

Still nothing.


Lucky you ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 02, 2009 at 08:59 PM
i noticed that when you look at the left border of the screen there is a thin purple/violet line sa right naman green...do you guys have that sa C10 niyo?

salamat :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 03, 2009 at 01:22 PM
i noticed that when you look at the left border of the screen there is a thin purple/violet line sa right naman green...do you guys have that sa C10 niyo?

salamat :)

Yeah, do you guys have this?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: dobler on Aug 03, 2009 at 03:08 PM
Yeah, do you guys have this?

Just curious, how close do you have to look at the screen to notice. I'm thinking of buying the 50 incher later this year. Thanks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 03, 2009 at 03:14 PM
Just curious, how close do you have to look at the screen to notice. I'm thinking of buying the 50 incher later this year. Thanks.

Oh very close, almost like having your face right in-front of the screen :)


POST UPDATE:

Just for the record, I've encountered my 1st genuine issue with the C10. It "powers" down (switches off), leaving a blinking red light, spoke to Vic of Sights and Sounds already and a replacement is on the way!

That's what I call service=)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 03, 2009 at 03:26 PM
I've tried it, but I still don't see it.

I have 2 sets of ceiling lights in my video room: 4 recessed incandescent lamps (with dimmer); and 1 circular fluorescent lamp.

I tried all sorts of combinations: fluorescent only; incandescent only (bright and dimmed); both fluorescent and incandescent (bright and dimmed); all lights off; LED flashlight shining on the screen with ceiling lights on/off/bright/dimmed; etc.  ...

Still nothing.

naalala ko tuloy nung naghahanap ako ng green trails  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 03, 2009 at 03:29 PM
naalala ko tuloy nung naghahanap ako ng green trails  :D

Boss, I did not get your PM, you may want to re-send it ;)

Bili na na ba tayo ng 50 inch? ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Aug 03, 2009 at 05:01 PM
i noticed that when you look at the left border of the screen there is a thin purple/violet line sa right naman green...do you guys have that sa C10 niyo?


Yes, my 50C10 has them: purple on the left, green on the right.  My old 42 Panny EDTV also had exactly the same thing.  

They're noticeable only when the program material's image has white or light-colored areas on the left and right edges, and only when I'm extremely close to the screen, about a foot away.




Just for the record, I've encountered my 1st genuine issue with the C10. It "powers" down (switches off), leaving a blinking red light, spoke to Vic of Sights and Sounds already and a replacement is on the way!

That's what I call service=)

Kudos to sir Vic for the great service!  Too bad that we won't have an opportunity to try and figure out what went wrong, but I'm happy that you won't have to worry about it.

Blinking lights on a Panasonic plasma are error codes.  If something goes wrong, the unit automatically shuts down to prevent any further damage, then the red light beside the power button blinks.

The number of blinks represents the corresponding error code that's supposed to assist the repair technician in making a diagnosis.  Here's an avsforum thread on power board defect = 7 blinks on the red light: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=993769&highlight=panasonic+blinking+light

Maybe you should try out a 50C10 as a replacement and pay the price difference?   ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 04, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Maybe you should try out a 50C10 as a replacement and pay the price difference?   ;)
go carlo  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 04, 2009 at 12:32 AM
Boss, I did not get your PM, you may want to re-send it ;)
Bili na na ba tayo ng 50 inch? ;)
cancelled bro, prolly on or after xmas.  pm you details.  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 04, 2009 at 12:34 AM

Yes, my 50C10 has them: purple on the left, green on the right.  My old 42 Panny EDTV also had exactly the same thing.  

They're noticeable only when the program material's image has white or light-colored areas on the left and right edges, and only when I'm extremely close to the screen, about a foot away.




Kudos to sir Vic for the great service!  Too bad that we won't have an opportunity to try and figure out what went wrong, but I'm happy that you won't have to worry about it.

Blinking lights on a Panasonic plasma are error codes.  If something goes wrong, the unit automatically shuts down to prevent any further damage, then the red light beside the power button blinks.

The number of blinks represents the corresponding error code that's supposed to assist the repair technician in making a diagnosis.  Here's an avsforum thread on power board defect = 7 blinks on the red light: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=993769&highlight=panasonic+blinking+light

Maybe you should try out a 50C10 as a replacement and pay the price difference?   ;)


@barrister
simpleng kulam sir!  :D

@carlo
could you elaborate on what happened? it just powered down while you were watching?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 04, 2009 at 01:07 AM
@barrister
simpleng kulam sir!  :D

@carlo
could you elaborate on what happened? it just powered down while you were watching?

Yes, it just went off, and the red lights were blinking already.

cancelled bro, prolly on or after xmas.  pm you details.  ;D


Got your PM and I think it's a very very good move ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Aug 04, 2009 at 02:09 AM
I've tried it, but I still don't see it.

I have 2 sets of ceiling lights in my video room: 4 recessed incandescent lamps (with dimmer); and 1 circular fluorescent lamp.

I tried all sorts of combinations: fluorescent only; incandescent only (bright and dimmed); both fluorescent and incandescent (bright and dimmed); all lights off; LED flashlight shining on the screen with ceiling lights on/off/bright/dimmed; etc.  ...

Still nothing.

With the tv turned off try doing it again when all the room lights are on or its daytime. Shine your LED flashlight on the upper left corner part of the tv screen, then look on the panel about 8 to 10 inches to the right of the X looking reflection of the flashlight. Now with your face about 12 to 15 inches from the screen, try focusing your eyes alternately on the glass surface itself and on the the actual reflection of the room. Hope you'll notice it na. :D

@carlo

Tama! Get the 50" instead na sir! ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Aug 04, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Sir chris69ners:  I'll try it.  Thanks for the tip!




@barrister
simpleng kulam sir!  :D
 

 :D  Bakit naman, brader?  ???  Barya lang naman ni boss Carlo ang price difference, di ba?  ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 04, 2009 at 05:19 PM
Sir chris69ners:  I'll try it.  Thanks for the tip!



  

 :D  Bakit naman, brader?  ???  Barya lang naman ni boss Carlo ang price difference, di ba?  ;)

Di po koya :D

Back to business...

About reflectivity:

I would have to agree with barrister on the "benefits" of reflectivity. After spending some quality time with the C10, I noticed that the older PV80 seems to be a bit on the dull side. Reflective screens with carefully controlled lights can give you a very good "glossy" picture. This, however, is a very subjective observation and will really depend on individual tastes.

About image retention:

It still has it, after a round of games, do switch off your lights, and go to a blank input screen. You'll see the game H.U.D ghostings, but this is not really an avenue of much concern, as the "ghosts" will rapidly evaporate within a few minutes of veiwing new content .

For PS3 users: (C10 and S10)

Guys how do you find the default "game" mode? For me, it looks a bit dark, and if you use another setting for games,  be my freind and share them ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: firestorm on Aug 05, 2009 at 06:10 PM
Hi, great info you guys provide here. I'm wondering if anyone here has tried connecting their PC/laptop either using HDMI or VGA? How is the qualty? Thanks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 05, 2009 at 10:38 PM
Hi, great info you guys provide here. I'm wondering if anyone here has tried connecting their PC/laptop either using HDMI or VGA? How is the qualty? Thanks.
via hdmi using cq40 310 with ati HD3200.  perfect ;D 
just make sure you have the right codecs etc.  ;)
but audio output is still stereo   :(  (need to get one of those hp docking station to output digital audio*5.1*7.1)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 08, 2009 at 06:22 PM
i just removed the panel sticker of the c10 today and i saw the term "24p" playback...it's available din sa pv80. question is...what does 24p playback mean? is it like the sammy movie plus option found sa a650?

salamat=)

pahabol...

what do you mean by pwm noise? and what does image banding mean? :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Aug 08, 2009 at 07:23 PM
question is...what does 24p playback mean? is it like the sammy movie plus option found sa a650?

24p means 24 progressive frames per second, the same frame rate on film in a movie theater.

No, it's not the same as Samsung's Movie Plus, which is 120 frames per second (120 Hz), achieved by inserting additional frames to the video source.



=================================



The only way to understand 24p is to start with the history of frame rate standards.

The standard frame rate for film started at 16 fps (frames per second) during the silent movie era.  The standard changed to 24 fps sometime during the introduction of sound films in the mid 1920's.  Since then, the standard frame rate for film has always been 24 fps.

As for TV, NTSC television engineering standards were adopted on May 2, 1941, with 30 frames per second or 60 fields per second with interlaced scanning.  The NTSC standard remains at 30 fps (or more accurately 29.97 fps), or 60 interlaced frames per second until today.

The frame rate difference between film's 24 fps and TV's 30 fps (60 interlaced fps) used to be irrelevant, since nobody at the time even dreamed that film would someday have to be be converted to NTSC standard for home video viewing.  Thus, nobody thought that compatibility between film and broadcast standards was at all necessary.

With the invention of home video, frame rate incompatibility between film and TV becomes a problem.  Now, the 24 fps standard has to be converted to the NTSC standard of 30 fps (60 interlaced) and/or the PAL standard of 25 fps (50 interlaced).

Due to the incompatible rates, film to video ("Telecine") conversion needs a corresponding frame rate conversion called "pulldown", a very complicated process that inevitably causes motion artifacts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine).

The most obvious motion artifact that results from telecine conversion is "Judder", which appears on flat panels during slow pans as jerky motion instead of smooth motion.  

To reduce judder, LCD's solution is for the TV's internal software to repeat the frames to produce 120 fps for NTSC and 100 fps for PAL.  Motion will be smoother, but the side-effect is an unnatural look, similar to a home video shot on a Handycam.  The "Hollywood movie look" will be converted to a "Telenovela look", and some people don't like it.  On U.S. forums, the recent term for it is the "SOE" ("Soap Opera Effect").

If you're looking for a video look that is closest to film in a theater, the best way to do it would be to view the 24fps film on 24fps video, to enable a 1:1 framerate, without pulldown.  This is possible with a Blu-ray player and TV that support 24p.  If your TV says "24p", it means that your TV is capable of displaying 24p from a 24p signal.

1080/24p is also supported on one SD-DVD-only player, the Toshiba XD-E500, which has its own thread here.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Aug 08, 2009 at 07:45 PM
pahabol...

what do you mean by pwm noise? and what does image banding mean? :)

PWM Noise refers to shimmering pixels, an artifact that sometimes appears on plasma TVs.  "PWM" means "Pulse-Width Modulation", a method of providing intermediate amounts of electrical power between fully-on and fully-off.

Image Banding refers to abrupt tonal changes in an image that should have gradual tonal gradations.  Here's an example from Planet Earth:

From the BBC HD broadcast:

(http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/7052/bbcbandhm2.png)
No banding issues.

From the controversial HD DVD/Blu-ray:

(http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/6651/pebandax0.png)
Unacceptable banding/posterization.    
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: titopepe on Aug 08, 2009 at 08:35 PM
na turn off ako sa reflectiveness ng c10, so py800 na pinili ko..
anlakas mangkulam ni sir carlo e! ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 08, 2009 at 09:40 PM
na turn off ako sa reflectiveness ng c10, so py800 na pinili ko..
anlakas mangkulam ni sir carlo e! ;D

Ganda ba sir :o
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: firestorm on Aug 08, 2009 at 10:03 PM
via hdmi using cq40 310 with ati HD3200.  perfect ;D 
just make sure you have the right codecs etc.  ;)
but audio output is still stereo   :(  (need to get one of those hp docking station to output digital audio*5.1*7.1)

Thanks for the reply. One more thing the 42c10 screen has an aspect ratio of 16x9 but it's native resolution of 1024x768 is not 16x9. Is there any effect of the video displayed?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 09, 2009 at 12:50 AM
@barrister

as usual, your reply remains insightful and very informative. thanks.

about the image banding, reason i asked kasi i read somewhere that the 2009 plasma series are still plagued by this issue...have you seen this on your plasma? thanks again.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Aug 09, 2009 at 10:48 AM
about the image banding, reason i asked kasi i read somewhere that the 2009 plasma series are still plagued by this issue...have you seen this on your plasma?

No, it's definitely not true that the 2009 Panny plasmas are "still plagued" by banding issues.

First, let's discuss the proper terminology.

When an image that should have gradual tonal gradations is rendered with abrupt tonal changes, the artifact is generally called "Posterization".  To describe posterization in computer graphics, the term is "Color Banding".

Illustration of Color Banding caused by insufficient BPP (bits per pixel):

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/9a/Colour_banding_example01.png/180px-Colour_banding_example01.png)

Other terms used to describe the artifact are "False Contouring", "Image Banding", and "Solarization".  False Contouring is an acceptable term but less commonly used.  Image banding is less acceptable and very seldomly used.  Solarization is also very seldomly used, since it's actually a term in photography that refers to a reversal of tone, so it's erroneous to use the term "solarization" to refer to posterization.

Whenever posterization is visible on an image in a flat panel display, the observer should be able to pinpoint the source of the posterization before blaming the display device.  Is it caused by the TV itself?  Is it caused by the player?  Or is it present on the disc itself as a compression artifact?

Here's an example of a less than credible review from cnet Australia:

Based on first impressions we gathered from the launch in Sydney, we only have generally positive things to say about the Panasonic range. However, one image artefact that the company has found hard to shake has been image banding — where gradations of colours appear as bands instead of one smooth image. Unfortunately, the S10 seemed to exhibit this from time to time as well. http://www.cnet.com.au/panasonic-viera-th-p42s10a-339296187.htm

The author's opinion is unreliable, since it does not appear that he bothered to check whether or not posterization is already present on the source material itself.

Posterization usually appears on underwater shots, sky shots, and areas with blurred backgrounds/foregrounds.  To test if the posterization is present on the source disc, I play the same scene on a CRT TV or CRT computer monitor.  All posterizations I've seen so far on my Panny plasma are the fault of the source disc, since I've confirmed that the posterization is also present when viewed on a CRT display.

Try the underwater scenes on the Superman Returns DVD, Chap. 28, 105:34 - 105:38 and 106:10 - 106:14.  You will notice posterization on a flat panel TV, but you can confirm that the posterization is present on the source disc because the artifact is also visible on a CRT monitor.  

Try the DVD of William Shakespeare's Hamlet (Kenneth Branagh) on a 42C10 and tell me if you can find posterization anywhere:

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/510zn7IHbGL._SL160_AA115_.jpg)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 09, 2009 at 01:33 PM
This may or may not be an issue of much concern but I think since I have it now I may as well bring it up...

Just this morning I saw my C10 with 5 uniformed vertical stripes on the unit with the T.V being switched off. I have similar PM's detailing the issue, so I know I'm not alone on this, I switched-on the T.V for a few mins. and the stripes sort of faded. I need to know if you guys have seen this...

Thank you.

POST UPDATE:

Sample PM's

"I just bought a brand new 42c10 plasma. Maganda naman yung picture quality ng TV but I noticed 5 uniformed size vertical stripes (top to bottom with 2" thickness) when the TV is off. Mapapansin mo lang sya if you looked closely to the TV as in dapat nakadikit yung mata mo sa display para mapansin yung mga lines at naka-off yung TV. Is it normal?
Natatakot lang ako baka magdevelop ito ng problem in the future."


"hi boss parang meron vertical lines sa C10 ko! Normal kaya yun?"


 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: abcerase on Aug 11, 2009 at 07:46 AM
sir carlo,

is this more "bang for the buck" compared to the 42s10? mga 20k rin kasi price difference eh...thanks po!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 11, 2009 at 11:32 AM
sir carlo,

is this more "bang for the buck" compared to the 42s10? mga 20k rin kasi price difference eh...thanks po!

Really depends, bec the S10 is a FULL HD unit that will outperform the C10 in the areas of viewing HD content like blu-ray or playing games on the PS3. Though the difference in picture quality is not hundreds of miles apart, you should determine for yourself if that difference is really worth the extra 20k.

As of now, though, the C10 is truly a "bang for the buck" unit.

 ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: abcerase on Aug 11, 2009 at 11:43 AM
thanks sir carlo :)

i'm into HD content and ps3 gaming po...so s10 is really for me?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: epic on Aug 11, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Saw 30 units of Panasonic  42C10 at Paeng's bowl in Robinsons Place Manila... Thye just recently upgraded their CRT monitors for the bowling scoring screen....


BR,
epic
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 11, 2009 at 02:40 PM
thanks sir carlo :)

i'm into HD content and ps3 gaming po...so s10 is really for me?

Sure, if you want to maximize what your blu-ray and ps3 units can do. Go 1080p, go for the S10 ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: abcerase on Aug 11, 2009 at 04:04 PM
Sure, if you want to maximize what your blu-ray and ps3 units can do. Go 1080p, go for the S10 ;)

thanks again sir carlo! i will be waiting, though, for your review of the G series kung mas ok yun :) thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 11, 2009 at 04:09 PM
thanks again sir carlo! i will be waiting, though, for your review of the G series kung mas ok yun :) thanks!

No problem, just ask away.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 12, 2009 at 05:05 AM
No, it's definitely not true that the 2009 Panny plasmas are "still plagued" by banding issues.

First, let's discuss the proper terminology.

When an image that should have gradual tonal gradations is rendered with abrupt tonal changes, the artifact is generally called "Posterization".  To describe posterization in computer graphics, the term is "Color Banding".

Illustration of Color Banding caused by insufficient BPP (bits per pixel):

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/9a/Colour_banding_example01.png/180px-Colour_banding_example01.png)

Other terms used to describe the artifact are "False Contouring", "Image Banding", and "Solarization".  False Contouring is an acceptable term but less commonly used.  Image banding is less acceptable and very seldomly used.  Solarization is also very seldomly used, since it's actually a term in photography that refers to a reversal of tone, so it's erroneous to use the term "solarization" to refer to posterization.

Whenever posterization is visible on an image in a flat panel display, the observer should be able to pinpoint the source of the posterization before blaming the display device.  Is it caused by the TV itself?  Is it caused by the player?  Or is it present on the disc itself as a compression artifact?

Here's an example of a less than credible review from cnet Australia:

Based on first impressions we gathered from the launch in Sydney, we only have generally positive things to say about the Panasonic range. However, one image artefact that the company has found hard to shake has been image banding — where gradations of colours appear as bands instead of one smooth image. Unfortunately, the S10 seemed to exhibit this from time to time as well. http://www.cnet.com.au/panasonic-viera-th-p42s10a-339296187.htm

The author's opinion is unreliable, since it does not appear that he bothered to check whether or not posterization is already present on the source material itself.

Posterization usually appears on underwater shots, sky shots, and areas with blurred backgrounds/foregrounds.  To test if the posterization is present on the source disc, I play the same scene on a CRT TV or CRT computer monitor.  All posterizations I've seen so far on my Panny plasma are the fault of the source disc, since I've confirmed that the posterization is also present when viewed on a CRT display.

Try the underwater scenes on the Superman Returns DVD, Chap. 28, 105:34 - 105:38 and 106:10 - 106:14.  You will notice posterization on a flat panel TV, but you can confirm that the posterization is present on the source disc because the artifact is also visible on a CRT monitor. 

Try the DVD of William Shakespeare's Hamlet (Kenneth Branagh) on a 42C10 and tell me if you can find posterization anywhere:

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/510zn7IHbGL._SL160_AA115_.jpg)
PWM Noise refers to shimmering pixels, an artifact that sometimes appears on plasma TVs.  "PWM" means "Pulse-Width Modulation", a method of providing intermediate amounts of electrical power between fully-on and fully-off.

Image Banding refers to abrupt tonal changes in an image that should have gradual tonal gradations.  Here's an example from Planet Earth:

From the BBC HD broadcast:

(http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/7052/bbcbandhm2.png)
No banding issues.

From the controversial HD DVD/Blu-ray:

(http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/6651/pebandax0.png)
Unacceptable banding/posterization.    

nice reading material bro  ;D
thanks for posting all these info, bago sakin itong mga ito  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: dulber32 on Aug 12, 2009 at 04:24 PM
[edit Bading] Banding issues pala yun.  :-X
I see that in Finding Nemo the sort of glow around the main fish characters.
I see it in lo quality LCDs and interestingly in an old 32" wide CRT. I'm actually using same source DVD to test out my options. Kelan kaya blow out sale nito kay boss Jeff?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: eksi on Aug 12, 2009 at 11:20 PM
Bading issues pala yun.

kulang ng 'n' ata bro, baka ma-misinterpret ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 13, 2009 at 11:55 PM
kulang ng 'n' ata bro, baka ma-misinterpret ;D ;D ;D
baka nga mabasa nung friend natin bro  ;D ;D ;D
btw banding issue in plasma doesnt concern me that much   :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM
@barrister

thank you for all the info=)

bec of the link you've provided i'm now asked to look for "banding" carefully sa plasma namin :)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Aug 15, 2009 at 11:06 AM
How's the IQ of this model when used for regular cable viewing?

Which one is brighter, the PV80 or this C model?

Umaangal na si Mrs. na maliit yung 29" na HD-CRT sa bedroom for Egreat playback (pahamak na Egreat  ;D).  Pero maganda yung CRT for local cable viewing.

Thanks in advance!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 15, 2009 at 01:14 PM
How's the IQ of this model when used for regular cable viewing?

Which one is brighter, the PV80 or this C model?

Umaangal na si Mrs. na maliit yung 29" na HD-CRT sa bedroom for Egreat playback (pahamak na Egreat  ;D).  Pero maganda yung CRT for local cable viewing.

Thanks in advance!


what kind of brightness are we talking about with regards to cable viewing sir allan?  when fed by a normal-strength signal i'd generally say my 42pc10 is as close as you'll get to crt cable viewing with a flat screen.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Aug 15, 2009 at 02:01 PM
what kind of brightness are we talking about with regards to cable viewing sir allan?  when fed by a normal-strength signal i'd generally say my 42pc10 is as close as you'll get to crt cable viewing with a flat screen.

Thanks Reyneir.  Every room in our place in Pasig has the option to be very very bright (as in over 500 lux daylight bright - store bright) or dim (but we never watch in pitch dark conditions).  Observing my family's viewing habits, mahilig silang manood under bright conditions kase nagbabasa or gumagawa ng kung ano-ano while viewing, except during late night.   Thus, plasma with bright image would be preferable under such illumination conditions.   Besides, I dont think my wife or daughter would want to watch cable programs (especially local variety shows and news programs in ABS-CBN or GMA) under dim conditions.  I am familiar with the brightness level of the PV80, but I'd be very interested to know the comparative brightness of the C series.  If it's equivalent in brightness to the X model, then that would be great for my family's application in Manila.

Also, Im concerned about the general image quality of Sky cable channels.  CRTs are able to compensate for that reasonably well.  I am aware that plasmas handle good strength/quality SD signals better than LCDs, but I dont know how plasmas deal with bad cable signal. 

So dalawa lang ang concern ko bale.  Local cable program IQ and Egreat viewing (but the latter is better than OK Im sure).

Anyways, it's quite reassuring to be informed that with normal-strength local cable signal, your C10 compares quite well with a CRT.  Thanks!
 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 15, 2009 at 04:58 PM
Thanks Reyneir.  Every room in our place in Pasig has the option to be very very bright (as in over 500 lux daylight bright - store bright) or dim (but we never watch in pitch dark conditions).  Observing my family's viewing habits, mahilig silang manood under bright conditions kase nagbabasa or gumagawa ng kung ano-ano while viewing, except during late night.   Thus, plasma with bright image would be preferable under such illumination conditions.   Besides, I dont think my wife or daughter would want to watch cable programs (especially local variety shows and news programs in ABS-CBN or GMA) under dim conditions.  I am familiar with the brightness level of the PV80, but I'd be very interested to know the comparative brightness of the C series.  If it's equivalent in brightness to the X model, then that would be great for my family's application in Manila.

Also, Im concerned about the general image quality of Sky cable channels.  CRTs are able to compensate for that reasonably well.  I am aware that plasmas handle good strength/quality SD signals better than LCDs, but I dont know how plasmas deal with bad cable signal. 

So dalawa lang ang concern ko bale.  Local cable program IQ and Egreat viewing (but the latter is better than OK Im sure).

Anyways, it's quite reassuring to be informed that with normal-strength local cable signal, your C10 compares quite well with a CRT.  Thanks!
 

hmmm,  should i assume that the light sources of your pasig residence are adequately diffused?   just a thought as i know you are well aware of how reflective this unit is.  i actually have destiny cable at home as of now.  with the cable signal booster turned off,  i'd say same quality ang crt and my pc10 as this signal has a bit of noise from the get go.  but with an amplified cable signal, i have to say the pc10 wins hands down.  at least with the quality of destiny cable's signal here in greenpark pasig village...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 15, 2009 at 05:15 PM
How's the IQ of this model when used for regular cable viewing?

Which one is brighter, the PV80 or this C model?

Umaangal na si Mrs. na maliit yung 29" na HD-CRT sa bedroom for Egreat playback (pahamak na Egreat  ;D).  Pero maganda yung CRT for local cable viewing.

Thanks in advance!


this is a newbie observation so it could be very inaccurate...

i still prefer our 29inch crt for cable viewing over plasma or lcd...not that the C10 is bad, it's actually very good but it lacks...crisp? or punch? maybe i just find the picture a bit soft. we're using skycable nga pala here sa q,c and maybe when skyhd is finally installed baka magbago yung observation ko=)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Aug 15, 2009 at 07:10 PM
hmmm,  should i assume that the light sources of your pasig residence are adequately diffused?   just a thought as i know you are well aware of how reflective this unit is.  i actually have destiny cable at home as of now.  with the cable signal booster turned off,  i'd say same quality ang crt and my pc10 as this signal has a bit of noise from the get go.  but with an amplified cable signal, i have to say the pc10 wins hands down.  at least with the quality of destiny cable's signal here in greenpark pasig village...

Nope the light sources are not diffused and I have added enough daylight lamps within every room to spread the illumination evenly all around - para madali magbasa and our family likes it very bright because somehow, it makes us feel the room is cool, the atmosphere jolly and the food nice to look at.   ;)

Yes Ive read about the reflectivity of this particular model.  I have to ask the wife to check that out well.  The X model is not distinctively more reflective than other models Ive seen kaya if the C model is like a dark mirror, then it might be a concern.  However, I would imagine it cant be worse than a flat CRT in terms of reflection - just bigger in area.  Cheers!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Aug 15, 2009 at 07:26 PM
this is a newbie observation so it could be very inaccurate...

i still prefer our 29inch crt for cable viewing over plasma or lcd...not that the C10 is bad, it's actually very good but it lacks...crisp? or punch? maybe i just find the picture a bit soft. we're using skycable nga pala here sa q,c and maybe when skyhd is finally installed baka magbago yung observation ko=)

All impressions and observations are sincerely appreciated.

Actually, I wouldnt be surprised to find out that SD cable viewing on the CRT would be nicer compared to that of Plasma, especially if the video signal is not really optimum as in the case of Skycable.  Pero as long as hindi considered as "pangit" yung image ng Plasma, it would be tolerable.   And you're right, once you get enough channels from SkyHD, then bye bye CRT.   :)

One more concern, how's the sound quality of the C model?   Matinis or manipis ba?  Thanks as always!


 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 15, 2009 at 07:35 PM
All impressions and observations are sincerely appreciated.

Actually, I wouldnt be surprised to find out that SD cable viewing on the CRT would be nicer compared to that of Plasma, especially if the video signal is not really optimum as in the case of Skycable.  Pero as long as hindi considered as "pangit" yung image ng Plasma, it would be tolerable.   And you're right, once you get enough channels from SkyHD, then bye bye CRT.   :)

One more concern, how's the sound quality of the C model?   Matinis or manipis ba?  Thanks as always!


 

the sound is more than adequate given na it's stock lang naman, but parang mas maganda yung sound ng py800 namin over this and the s10. i think the bbe-viva sound (py800) is way better than the 2009 v-audio :( hope it's not replicated sa g11...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 15, 2009 at 08:53 PM
my problem is that the way this unit's audio is calibrated, the bass output makes the universal flatscreen bracket i'm using vibrate (and subsequently the tv itself starts vibrating). i have a feeling this is specific to my setup as i am using a universal bracket with a lot of movable parts, and the bracket is not mounted to the wall.  my av rack has a spine for the mounting of the tv for a "floating" effect.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Aug 15, 2009 at 09:01 PM
the sound is more than adequate given na it's stock lang naman, but parang mas maganda yung sound ng py800 namin over this and the s10. i think the bbe-viva sound (py800) is way better than the 2009 v-audio :( hope it's not replicated sa g11...

It is likely, unfortunately - because one of the ways to reduce the power consumption of the 2009 models is by stripping down the stock sound system.    Kasama na rin yung smaller/narrower bezel design - ergo smaller space for speakers  :(    Sa V series for instance, Panasonic have reduced the number of  speakers to 2 sets compared to 6 sa PZ800.   Well, as long the voice of ladies on TV dont sound like Matutina - you probably dont know her.   ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 15, 2009 at 10:02 PM
It is likely, unfortunately - because one of the ways to reduce the power consumption of the 2009 models is by stripping down the stock sound system.    Kasama na rin yung smaller/narrower bezel design - ergo smaller space for speakers  :(    Sa V series for instance, Panasonic have reduced the number of  speakers to 2 sets compared to 6 sa PZ800.   Well, as long the voice of ladies on TV dont sound like Matutina - you probably dont know her.   ;D

john en marsha! maypagka-sanggol pa ako ng panahong yan sir pero naaalala ko naman sya hehehe...

@comitatus
as i don't get to watch cable as often now, it took a while for me to recognize the relative "softness" of the cable's  pq.  i guess what gives an HD plasma its advantage over an HD lcd with cable and SD in general is what keeps it from being able to surpass a good SD crt.

i have gotten used to the soft pq though.

also, how is the skycable signal strength there in your area?  the cable pq of my pc10 seems much better now with a cable amplifier installed.  i have a feeling that the pc10 requires a much stronger cable signal than a crt.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 16, 2009 at 01:11 AM
It is likely, unfortunately - because one of the ways to reduce the power consumption of the 2009 models is by stripping down the stock sound system.    Kasama na rin yung smaller/narrower bezel design - ergo smaller space for speakers  :(    Sa V series for instance, Panasonic have reduced the number of  speakers to 2 sets compared to 6 sa PZ800.   Well, as long the voice of ladies on TV dont sound like Matutina - you probably dont know her.   ;D

of course i know matutina and her boss Doña Delilah, my mom has beta/vhs re-runs of the show that i used to watch with her when i was very very young. if those tapes still work they're still stacked up in our old house=)

the other matutina i know... is this great restaurant my mom and i go to before we reach the church in manaoag, pangasinan? (tama ba spelling?)

john en marsha! maypagka-sanggol pa ako ng panahong yan sir pero naaalala ko naman sya hehehe...

@comitatus
as i don't get to watch cable as often now, it took a while for me to recognize the relative "softness" of the cable's  pq.  i guess what gives an HD plasma its advantage over an HD lcd with cable and SD in general is what keeps it from being able to surpass a good SD crt.

i have gotten used to the soft pq though.

also, how is the skycable signal strength there in your area?  the cable pq of my pc10 seems much better now with a cable amplifier installed.  i have a feeling that the pc10 requires a much stronger cable signal than a crt.

sky has a very good signal here, and we also have a signal amplifier installed...i watch a lot of cable before i fall senselessly to sleep... :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Aug 16, 2009 at 08:04 PM
Hi Invinciible, Comitatus,

What brand/model are you using for CATV Signal Amplifier?

Yeah, the C10 might need a little boost than my previous Wega CRT.

 :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 16, 2009 at 08:24 PM
Hi Invinciible, Comitatus,

What brand/model are you using for CATV Signal Amplifier?

Yeah, the C10 might need a little boost than my previous Wega CRT.

 :)


i bought the one from electronic boutique.  some have said this has improved their pq tremendously while others have ended up returning it to the store due to having no effect at all.  really depends on your area's cable signal.  if you can spare the expense(less than a grand),  why not try it out? ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 16, 2009 at 11:37 PM
Hi Invinciible, Comitatus,

What brand/model are you using for CATV Signal Amplifier?

Yeah, the C10 might need a little boost than my previous Wega CRT.

 :)


hmmm...i'll check, it was installed by a sky technician=)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: threadlock on Aug 17, 2009 at 04:40 PM
Anyone care to compare the picture quality between 50c10 and 42c10?
I was thinking the two will look quite different since they have different native resolutions. While the 50c10 is bigger, it has also higher pixel count (1366x768) vs 42c10's 1024 x 768 and the 50c10's resolution scales better and is nearer to any widescreen resolution.
Did anyone notice if the picture quality of 42C10 is a little softer compared to 50C10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 17, 2009 at 05:03 PM
shots of the 50C10 with my fav game^^^ (nga pala we upgraded to the 50 inch version for our replacement unit)  ;)

(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5588/test01i.th.jpg) (http://img193.imageshack.us/my.php?image=test01i.jpg)

2-D rules! burnnnn knuckleeeee^

shot with nhk, using skycable=)

(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/912/test00.th.jpg) (http://img193.imageshack.us/my.php?image=test00.jpg)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 20, 2009 at 09:57 AM
more game shots for the c10=)

(http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/zz259/geekygal800/DSC01132.jpg)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: threadlock on Aug 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM
more game shots for the c10=)

(http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/zz259/geekygal800/DSC01132.jpg)
Is that from 50C10?
The pic looks sharp. Now Im convince I have to audition the unit myself.  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 20, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Is that from 50C10?
The pic looks sharp. Now Im convince I have to audition the unit myself.  ;D

yes that's a 50C10 running a ps3 on 720p, using the default "game" setting with no tweaks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 21, 2009 at 05:24 AM
shots of the 50C10 with my fav game^^^ (nga pala we upgraded to the 50 inch version for our replacement unit)  ;)

(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5588/test01i.th.jpg) (http://img193.imageshack.us/my.php?image=test01i.jpg)

2-D rules! burnnnn knuckleeeee^

one of my favorite games ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: vx2 on Aug 21, 2009 at 07:57 AM
(nga pala we upgraded to the 50 inch version for our replacement unit)  ;)

Replacement unit? So those "vertical lines" are really some sort of defect ba?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 21, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Replacement unit? So those "vertical lines" are really some sort of defect ba?

The unit was replaced because of a power problem, not because of the "vertical lines". The vertical lines "issue"  needs another look, for it may be normal.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: vx2 on Aug 21, 2009 at 12:18 PM
What iz zis "power problem"?  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 22, 2009 at 11:53 AM
What iz zis "power problem"?  ;D
nervous?   ::) ::)
don't worry too much bro, most known issues of plasma panels has already been posted/addressed.  it's really up to you now, if you want to try the technology or not  ;)   (after knowing all the pros and cons):D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 23, 2009 at 01:03 AM
one of my favorite games ;D

cool but they removed so many characters >:(

@vx2

the 42C10 powered down tapos it left a few blinking lights.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 23, 2009 at 09:20 AM
whoa... flashing back to neo geo days...  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM
whoa... flashbacking to neo geo days...  ;D

yup! i still have a Neo-Geo AES!

my top 3 neo-geo games:

(http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/zz259/geekygal800/Image000.jpg)

actually these are my "prize" geeky possessions, not bags and shoes (one of them being far more expensive than a plasma). sad they look crappy on a plasma(C10/S10/PY800), that's why i'm pushing for a really good crt.

as soon as my neo geo s-video comes in... i'll try to post a pic of the neo with the C10...just to show how modern tech works with old school games :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 23, 2009 at 01:01 PM
yup! i still have a Neo-Geo AES!

my top 3 neo-geo games:

(http://i833.photobucket.com/albums/zz259/geekygal800/Image000.jpg)

actually these are my "prize" geeky possessions, not bags and shoes (one of them being far more expensive than a plasma). sad they look crappy on a plasma(C10/S10/PY800), that's why i'm pushing for a really good crt.

as soon as my neo geo s-video comes in... i'll try to post a pic of the neo with the C10...just to show how modern tech works with old school games :D

ok now i'm flashing back to bags and shoes i have "lovingly" bought in the past...  ::)

samurai showdown! ;D   if only i were as good at maintaining my videogame consoles... going back to topic, i'm guessing these have  "soft" pq when played on a plasma...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 23, 2009 at 02:00 PM
ok now i'm flashing back to bags and shoes i have "lovingly" bought in the past...  ::)

samurai showdown! ;D   if only i were as good at maintaining my videogame consoles... going back to topic, i'm guessing these have  "soft" pq when played on a plasma...

yes it's soft, and you could really see it being very blocky. same thing when i hooked up my super famicom, mega drive and the turbo duo...will upgrading to s-video help?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 23, 2009 at 02:17 PM
ah i guess that is really the case when those pixels are magnified to 720p...  i honestly do not know if s-video would help... i'll do my best to find my SD dvd player and try to compare a composite and s-video connection...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 23, 2009 at 02:59 PM
ah i guess that is really the case when those pixels are magnified to 720p...  i honestly do not know if s-video would help... i'll do my best to find my SD dvd player and try to compare a composite and s-video connection...

thanks i hope you can find it=) so far..engaging 4:3 appears to have lessened the problem and whenever i press the recall button the t.v says the res is 480i.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: chris69ners on Aug 23, 2009 at 08:52 PM
From previous experience, using an s-video connection compared to composite will just make the images cleaner and smoother but not necessarily sharper. It might also remove jaggies and rainbow artifacts from edge enhancement on the outline of the images, specially texts.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 24, 2009 at 09:51 AM
From previous experience, using an s-video connection compared to composite will just make the images cleaner and smoother but not necessarily sharper. It might also remove jaggies and rainbow artifacts from edge enhancement on the outline of the images, specially texts.

tested the s-video last night, and it was cleaner...the blocky sprites were still there but ok lang. i don't think they had plasma's in mind naman when they made the system back in the early 90's.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Aug 24, 2009 at 10:12 AM
tested the s-video last night, and it was cleaner...the blocky sprites were still there but ok lang. i don't think they had plasma's in mind naman when they made the system back in the early 90's.

and i would think that the pixelization adds to the nostalgic effect of the whole thing even a little bit...   ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Aug 24, 2009 at 01:29 PM
@comitatus/Yuriko

Your hobby is really bordering on the hard-core, I still can't get over how much those carts cost.

HD units will not really work well with 16 bit era consoles, simply because those consoles were designed with probably up to 29 inch CRT monitors in mind. They looked very well then, when most of our T.V's were still relying on RF and composite connections. I don't think the HD era even crossed their minds when SNK/Nintendo/Sega engineers made these things. Even much later 128 bit PS2 models work best when partnered with a CRT T.V. 

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Aug 29, 2009 at 07:59 PM
Congrats to those who get 42C10 today.

Last 6 units to last until this weekend. Next shipment coming mid of September.

ON SALE    ON SALE    ON SALE    ON SALE    ON SALE
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: SymphonyX7 on Aug 30, 2009 at 05:47 PM
Guys, me and my dad just came from Ansons Makati a while ago.

We're currently eying the Panasonic TH-P50C10 and TH-P42S10. We were fortunate enough to have the two units side by side. The sales personnel also was kind enough to lower the blinds to cover the windows because of the excessive sunlight.

I just noticed that the 50" C10 was not as bright as the 42" S10 even when both set to the "Cinema" picture setting. The S10 was expectedly much sharper than the C10 when it came to HD content from the Blu-ray disc. But when we requested for a regular DVD with SD content, the 1080p S10 was still sharper. Shouldn't the 720p/1080i C10 be sharper when it comes to SD content because the image isn't stretched as much?

The lowest they could give us for both units is 18 months 0% interest @ 78K for the P42S10 and 93K for the P50C10.

Any suggestions on what to get? The P42C10 was out of the question because the 1024x768 resolution turned me off. We were already supposed to get the P42S10 but we're only holding out for tomorrow because I convinced him to check out Sights and Sounds in Shangri-La first (and that I wanted my dad to get the bigger TV... more fun for me!). I told him it was cheap there (according to the guys here and TipidPC). I just don't know how cheap they really are.

BTW, we already removed the LCD options. We like the image quality of plasma TVs more. Colors on the LCD TVs look too artificial and it didn't have any depth at all compared to a plasma. The LCDs we considered beforehand were the Sony Bravia W550 40" and Samsung Series 5 (the 79K and 91K Php ones, I forgot the model number. Sorry).
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: borly on Aug 30, 2009 at 06:02 PM
Guys, me and my dad just came from Ansons Makati a while ago.

We're currently eying the Panasonic TH-P50C10 and TH-P42S10. We were fortunate enough to have the two units side by side. The sales personnel also was kind enough to lower the blinds to cover the windows because of the excessive sunlight.

I just noticed that the 50" C10 was not as bright as the 42" S10 even when both set to the "Cinema" picture setting. The S10 was expectedly much sharper than the C10 when it came to HD content from the Blu-ray disc. But when we requested for a regular DVD with SD content, the 1080p S10 was still sharper. Shouldn't the 720p/1080i C10 be sharper when it comes to SD content because the image isn't stretched as much?

The lowest they could give us for both units is 18 months 0% interest @ 78K for the P42S10 and 93K for the P50C10.

Any suggestions on what to get? The P42C10 was out of the question because the 1024x768 resolution turned me off. We were already supposed to get the P42S10 but we're only holding out for tomorrow because I convinced him to check out Sights and Sounds in Shangri-La first (and that I wanted my dad to get the bigger TV... more fun for me!). I told him it was cheap there (according to the guys here and TipidPC). I just don't know how cheap they really are.

BTW, we already removed the LCD options. We like the image quality of plasma TVs more. Colors on the LCD TVs look too artificial and it didn't have any depth at all compared to a plasma. The LCDs we considered beforehand were the Sony Bravia W550 40" and Samsung Series 5 (the 79K and 91K Php ones, I forgot the model number. Sorry).

Hi Mr. Smith,

If you are willing to wait for the 42G11 (Full HD, NeoPDP), it's going to be in Sights and Sounds next week. Also, our resident sellers offer those sets for much much cheaper. :)

If you're willing to spend for the s10, I would suggest you go for the G11 instead. :)

http://www.avforums.com/reviews/Panasonic-TX-P42G10-Review.html (http://www.avforums.com/reviews/Panasonic-TX-P42G10-Review.html)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 30, 2009 at 06:11 PM

The lowest they could give us for both units is 18 months 0% interest @ 78K for the P42S10 and 93K for the P50C10.

if you don't mind me asking, what's the name of the store that gave you this price at 18months zero interest?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: SymphonyX7 on Aug 30, 2009 at 06:16 PM
Hi Mr. Smith,

If you are willing to wait for the 42G11 (Full HD, NeoPDP), it's going to be in Sights and Sounds next week.  Also, our resident sellers offer those sets for much much cheaper. :)

If you're willing to spend for the s10, I would suggest you go for the G11 instead. :)

I heard it was cheap here, but in cash. My dad said he'd go no less than 12 months installment. The 18 months / 0% interest is what attracted him. The prices in Ansons are easy to haggle. SM Appliance is a bitch. Automatic Center's sale in Greenhills was initially looking like a steal, but Ansons can match them except for the Bravia W550 40" @ 103K Php / 12 mo 0% interest with a free home theatre set.

I apologize for hijacking this thread. But what does the G11 have that the S and C don't? And will it cost too much? Our budget is 100K Php ceiling.


@ ninjababez

Ansons Makati beside Landmark.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: iiinas on Aug 30, 2009 at 06:28 PM
I heard it was cheap here, but in cash. My dad said he'd go no less than 12 months installment. The 18 months / 0% interest is what attracted him. The prices in Ansons are easy to haggle. SM Appliance is a bitch. Automatic Center's sale in Greenhills was initially looking like a steal, but Ansons can match them except for the Bravia W550 40" @ 103K Php / 12 mo 0% interest with a free home theatre set.

I apologize for hijacking this thread. But what does the G11 have that the S and C don't? And will it cost too much? Our budget is 100K Php ceiling.


@ ninjababez

Ansons Makati beside Landmark.

neo pdp, the new generation plasma panel.

from askmen.com:

"The Panasonic NEO PDP does much more than just reduce the amount of energy consumed; there is a side effect of improved contrast ratios, which in turn results in deeper and richer black levels and an overall better picture. Like all other current Panasonic models, the NEO PDP still supports Infinite Black, meaning that the TV basically turns off during dark scenes. The TV also has something called a 600Hz sub-field drive, but in reality this does little more than 120Hz, so avoid confusion and just know that the Panasonic NEO PDP handles motion resolution extremely well. Continuing on the success and praise it received last year, Panasonic has kept their anti-reflective plasma glare on the NEO PDP, which is a major plus for guys who might set this unit up in a room with a lot of natural light."
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 31, 2009 at 03:57 AM

I apologize for hijacking this thread. But what does the G11 have that the S and C don't? And will it cost too much? Our budget is 100K Php ceiling.


@ ninjababez

Ansons Makati beside Landmark.
thanks for answering bro.  kaka-tingin ko lang sa malls kahapon ng mga tv's at halos ka-presyo na ng resellers natin dito, kaso iba parin mag asikaso ng warranty dito compared to big appliance center.
for me the neo pdp panel is the 2nd best thing after pioneer kuro.  id get one if budget permits.  ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Aug 31, 2009 at 07:49 AM
I heard it was cheap here, but in cash. My dad said he'd go no less than 12 months installment. The 18 months / 0% interest is what attracted him.

I read somewhere that the G model would sell for something between 75K to 80K cash at suking tindahans here.

Try to ask your Dadeih this question.  Would he rather pay for 18 months for an entry level full HD model, or pay cash for something that is getting raved reviews right now?    That might turn out to be 18 long months of regret you know.    The savings palang sa monthly electric bill nyo for the entire lifespan of the plasma might be able to cover for any other price difference between the S and V.

The Dadeih and you should check out the G model before deciding.  Kung wala kang makitang difference, eh di magaling (din) ang S kung ganon.   No need to rush a 100K TV purchase.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: SymphonyX7 on Aug 31, 2009 at 10:41 AM
I read somewhere that the G model would sell for something between 75K to 80K cash at suking tindahans here.

Try to ask your Dadeih this question.  Would he rather pay for 18 months for an entry level full HD model, or pay cash for something that is getting raved reviews right now?    That might turn out to be 18 long months of regret you know.    The savings palang sa monthly electric bill nyo for the entire lifespan of the plasma might be able to cover for any other price difference between the S and V.

The Dadeih and you should check out the G model before deciding.  Kung wala kang makitang difference, eh di magaling (din) ang S kung ganon.   No need to rush a 100K TV purchase.

My parents have their reasons for not wanting to pay in cash, I think one of them is cause my term just ended and my tuition again next term which has a deadline next, next week without surcharge. That's almost 60K again. I can understand if they don't buy the TV But apparently they're totally go with installment since it's manageable. I hope you understand that not all of us can just burn cash like that.

Anyway, I've been reading stuff regarding the G-series. Apparently power consumption-wise, the reflection on the electricity bill is negligible for those who've upgraded from an older model. But of course, why get the old when you can get the new one, right? We can hold off the purchase for now, but we'll see first if the G-series actually looks as nice as everyone else says and if Sights and Sounds can give us a reasonable installment deal on the G-series. If they can't offer us a deal or if they run out of stock (I'm assuming several dozen guys here want the G-series real bad, like you, and will get it immediately in cash), we'll just wait until the G-series is officially here.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: borly on Aug 31, 2009 at 11:23 AM
My parents have their reasons for not wanting to pay in cash, I think one of them is cause my term just ended and my tuition again next term which has a deadline next, next week without surcharge. That's almost 60K again. I can understand if they don't buy the TV But apparently they're totally go with installment since it's manageable. I hope you understand that not all of us can just burn cash like that.

Anyway, I've been reading stuff regarding the G-series. Apparently power consumption-wise, the reflection on the electricity bill is negligible for those who've upgraded from an older model. But of course, why get the old when you can get the new one, right? We can hold off the purchase for now, but we'll see first if the G-series actually looks as nice as everyone else says and if Sights and Sounds can give us a reasonable installment deal on the G-series. If they can't offer us a deal or if they run out of stock (I'm assuming several dozen guys here want the G-series real bad, like you, and will get it immediately in cash), we'll just wait until the G-series is officially here.

Sights and Sounds offers installment plans via credit card.  Vic will be more than glad to present to you the different amounts for varying amortizations.  At the price that our local appliance stores are offering the S10, you'll still get the g10 much cheaper even if it were amortized.  Anyways, the g10 will (hopefully) be available by tomorrow. 

For me kasi, it's either I go for the c10 or the g10. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Aug 31, 2009 at 11:46 AM
this is the subject of a debate between my hubby(carlo777) and me...the 50c10 vs the 42g11, since the price of the two is not far apart.

ako, i'd go for the 50c10 over the 42g11, do note that i saw the 42g10(u.s version of the g11) while i was in the u.s a few months back. though i was impressed by the g10, i was not as "floored" by it the way i was with the 50c10.

the full 1080p panel gives intricate details at a viewing distance of 2-4 feet away, but seriously, even carlo777 is not allowed to watch that close to the tele, so that means at his "normal" viewing distance of 6-7 feet, he won't be able to appreciate the "advantage" of the g11.

on a 50 incher, the size advantage holds bearing even at farther distances. i'm way way happier with the 50c10 even over the 42py800/42S10, and so far the statement..."size matters" holds true(hmmm...parang that does not sound too nice :D :D :D)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Aug 31, 2009 at 09:59 PM
"size matters" holds true(hmmm...parang that does not sound too nice :D :D :D)
not if the topic is about flat panels  ;D
hayz, tagal ng xmas para 42" for my room and 50" for my ht  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: SymphonyX7 on Aug 31, 2009 at 11:43 PM
Again, we held our purchase. But my dad was so keen on getting the P42S10 a while ago from Ansons. But I convinced him again to reconsider the C-series (since we watch SD content 90% of the time). After inspecting closely, the reason why the S10 was so much brighter than the C10 was because of the screen. the S10's screen reflects A LOT less -- almost nothing at all. The C10 on the other hand... Christ! I can see my own face staring right back at me. I made sure everything was the same including picture settings and connection. The problem is that when I was in Sights and Sounds, the P42C10 looked incredibly nice with a Blu-Ray through HDMI. When we went back to Ansons, the P42C10 looked particularly awful beside the P42S10 and even the P50C10 only to my surprise that the P42C10 was connected via composite.  :o So I had it connected via HDMI. Lo and behold. It looked really nice again. Just as nice as the P50C10 without the ugly pricetag.

So here's the real problem: There's no X-series in the Philippines. It's supposedly the C-series but with the anti-glare filter found on the S-series. We really don't want the S10 simply because it's 1080p. The 768p C10 looked better handling SD content, save for the annoying mirror-like screen which makes it look dim as well. Ugh. I wish they had the P42X10 here. I don't want my ugly mug looking right back at me while I'm watching TV! This is going to be a really annoying problem during the daytime and our den/family room in particular was designed to have natural light flowing in. I don't want to wait for nightfall just to enjoy watching.

This is OT, but I'm thinking they deliberately rigged the P42C10 with the composite to make it look bad against the S10 and the P50C10. They didn't have stocks of the P42C10 so we were forced to come back on Saturday. Is it probably cause a lot of people were getting the P42C10 and were cannibalizing sales of the other models?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Sep 01, 2009 at 12:28 AM
I think they have the X10 sa SnS and/or Theaterworks but other forums seem to suggest that the X10 does not have AR also. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Sep 01, 2009 at 02:36 PM
3 units 42X10 readily available at P46K.  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: pantellica on Sep 10, 2009 at 04:58 PM
Took a video of the C10 but found it too grainy, it must be my lighting. Because of the video people may think that the C10 is grainy, but that's not the case. Just tell me if you guys want it posted despite the flaws, and I'll still upload it.

This is my take VS the PV80 so far:

Reflectivity:

I found out that the C10 is really reflective, to a point you'd need to have good lighting conditions. It does not have those "chicken wire" patterns, but if you're coming from a PV8 or 80 you may get a little bit distracted, as was my wife when she watched a blu-ray under normal lighting.

Dvd performance:

Mixed bag, and we're sort of divided here. While I prefer the sharper look of the PV80. My wife prefers the softer and deeper black defenition of the C10. Under normal lighting conditions the C10 does look darker than the PV80, maybe because much of the picture is drowned out by the reflections. Switch off all the lights and you'll begin to see the intricate details and the gorgeous blacks of the C10.

Phosphor Lag:

Great news! The C10 still has it, but not as "bad' as it was on the PV80 or the PV70.

Image Retention:

Are kidding me? Don't want to test this on my C10 and S10 extensively til break in is done. Right now they seem to be very mild compared to the PV80.

More to come.

POST UPDATE:

Sorry for the delay, Internet connection is pretty bad around my place today.
nice review and comparison sir....ok ka talaga carlo.. ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 10, 2009 at 07:06 PM
hi guys, during one of my hyper boring momments i unplugged the hdmi cable on our 50C10 and the xde dvd player and swapped it with components...then i swithed the player to output proggresive scan which was a simple 480p. i don't know if it's just me or does 480p really look better on a plasma? if i'm not mistaken dvds are native to 480p? if so, does it mean it's better to play them using the native res?

carlo777 thinks the pic looks a bit washed out but i say it's pretty cool...what do you guys think of components+480p on your c10?

salamat.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Sep 10, 2009 at 08:21 PM
hi guys, during one of my hyper boring momments i unplugged the hdmi cable on our 50C10 and the xde dvd player and swapped it with components...then i swithed the player to output proggresive scan which was a simple 480p. i don't know if it's just me or does 480p really look better on a plasma? if i'm not mistaken dvds are native to 480p? if so, does it mean it's better to play them using the native res?

carlo777 thinks the pic looks a bit washed out but i say it's pretty cool...what do you guys think of components+480p on your c10?

salamat.

tried this also in the past when my original hdmi cable konked out on me, using the xde player as well with a 42pc10.  kinda depends on how you like your pic.  the pq seemed cleaner in general, BUT had less detail.  of course if you consider that the xde actually is just creating additional pixels to fill out a 720p/1080p resolution, it might either mean to you that 480p is better since that is the unaltered resolution, OR you could also argue that you shouldn't use an upscaling player at 480p since a normal dvd player would suffice.   it gets a bit complicated to take a stand.  personally i prefer the upscaled pq as i share carlo's view that the 480p pq lacks detail.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Sep 10, 2009 at 09:35 PM
if i'm not mistaken dvds are native to 480p? if so, does it mean it's better to play them using the native res?

Not necessarily.  

DVD VOB files are encoded in 480i resolution (720 x 480) for NTSC format, and 576i (720 x 576) for PAL format.  Your TV's panel has a native resolution of 1366 x 768.  Due to the difference in resolutions, it is not possible to render a DVD image without scaling.  

Your TV can only render an image that is exactly 1366 x 768p.  Any input that is not 1366 x 768p must first be scaled by the TV's internal scaler to exactly 1366 x 768p before the image can be rendered.

Therefore, even if a 480p DVD signal is sent to the TV, the TV will still have to scale that video input to 1366 x 768p before the picture can be displayed.




i don't know if it's just me or does 480p really look better on a plasma?

If it looks better to you, then that's well and good.

But in my case, a 480i or 480p DVD signal via component input renders a soft (slightly blurred) image on my 50C10.  I observed the same result using 2 Pioneer DVD players and 1 Philips DVD player.  Using 1080p via HDMI, the picture is slightly sharper.  

Observe The Magdalene Sisters DVD.  On my TV at 1080p, the sharpness and the randomly-moving film grain are so natural that the video looks like true 35mm film.

To illustrate, compare these screen caps from the controversial Pan's Labyrinth BD:

(http://whiggles.landofwhimsy.com/funbag/pancomparison.jpg)

On the left is UK version with a more natural look; on the right is the smoother US version where the application of DNR (digital noise reduction) is very obvious.

Most people prefer a smooth picture even if the original image is altered to attain smoothness.  But others insist that the look of the original image must be preserved.



Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: CaptainA on Sep 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Newbhie here, i have been learning lot from this forum, thanks to the very detailed explanation"s of sir Carlo and all other Guru's out there sharing their ideas and precious time.

Now, I been searching for the difference of c10 and x10 and i havent got a solid answer.  Does the ~5K difference in price justified? Does the x10 have the Ar filter?  PLease help
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Sep 11, 2009 at 10:56 PM
Newbhie here, i have been learning lot from this forum, thanks to the very detailed explanation"s of sir Carlo and all other Guru's out there sharing their ideas and precious time.

Now, I been searching for the difference of c10 and x10 and i havent got a solid answer.  Does the ~5K difference in price justified? Does the x10 have the Ar filter?  PLease help

If reflections bother you then the extra 5k is worth it. With the X10 you also get 3 HDMI ports vs 2 on the C10, and for me that's a huge plus factor. Let's say you have a dvd and a blu-ray player so that uses 2 hdmi ports already! In the future if you want to add a WDTV or one of those spanky HD cable services or even a dedicated HD gaming console you're better covered with 3 ports over 2 ;)

Oh and thank you for the kind words.

@pantellica

Musta ang plasma natin chief? ;)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: CaptainA on Sep 12, 2009 at 09:56 AM
Salamat ulit Sir Carlo
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Sep 12, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Salamat ulit Sir Carlo

No problem Captain, just ask away if you have other concerns ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Mouldingo on Sep 12, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Newbhie here, i have been learning lot from this forum, thanks to the very detailed explanation"s of sir Carlo and all other Guru's out there sharing their ideas and precious time.

Now, I been searching for the difference of c10 and x10 and i havent got a solid answer.  Does the ~5K difference in price justified? Does the x10 have the Ar filter?  PLease help

The difference also includes a SD Card slot that allows  AVC/MPEG2 video playback from HD camcorders and view jpeg files for the X10 vs C10 jpeg only viewing. Honestly, the extra HDMI slot in front is a big help if you want a quick plug and play.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 12, 2009 at 07:20 PM
@barrister and Invinciible

thanks! what are the artifacts you can expect when you upscale a dvd from your c10? (dv-410v and xde-0500)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Sep 12, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Using my Pioneer 410, I sometimes notice fine jagged edges, but I'm not sure what it is or what's causing it.

I don't think it's a deinterlacing error, since I've been somewhat familiar with that artifact since my Laserdisc days.  

I suspect that it's CUE (Chroma Upsampling Error).
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 12, 2009 at 11:03 PM
Using my Pioneer 410, I sometimes notice fine jagged edges, but I'm not sure what it is or what's causing it.

I don't think it's a deinterlacing error, since I've been somewhat familiar with that artifact since my Laserdisc days.  

I suspect that it's CUE (Chroma Upsampling Error).


I see something like this...(similar po ba?)

(http://eirikso.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/picture-5.jpg)

it disappears when you go 480i
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: CaptainA on Sep 13, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Sir Mouldingo salamat din ng marami
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Sep 14, 2009 at 11:14 AM
I see something like this...(similar po ba?)

... it disappears when you go 480i


No, it's not that bad.  It appears as a combing artifact on diagonal edges, but I've only seen it on 2 DVDs so far.

I tried 480i component.  The combing artifact did not disappear, but it did become less noticeable.  It became less obvious because the picture became softer, and the softness masked the artifact.

I still don't know what's causing it, but if the artifact is indeed CUE (chroma upsampling error, sometimes called the "chroma bug"), then the error is caused by MPEG decoding, not by upscaling.

CUE will be present regardless of whether the player is set to 480i, 480p or 1080p because the problem arises from a decoding error of the 4:2:0 format chroma information, and not from the upscaling process.  

So far I've only seen it on 2 titles.  On those 2 titles, the combing appears very infrequently; and when it does appear, it's not very distracting.

I tried looking for the combing artifact last night while I was watching Hitler - The Rise of Evil DVD on my 50C10 at 1080p.  
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/410Z8QBM1CL._SL160_AA115_.jpg)

I didn't see any combing artifact whatsoever.  


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Sep 14, 2009 at 11:29 AM

No, it's not that bad.  It appears as a combing artifact on diagonal edges, but so far I've only seen it on 2 DVDs so far.

I tried 480i component.  The combing artifact did not disappear, but it did become less noticeable.  It became less obvious because the picture became softer, and the softness masked the artifact.

I still don't know what's causing it, but if the artifact is indeed CUE (chroma upsampling error, sometimes called the "chroma bug"), then the error is caused by MPEG decoding, not by upscaling.

CUE will be present regardless of whether the player is set to 480i, 480p or 1080p because the problem arises from a decoding error of the 4:2:0 format chroma information, and not from the upscaling process.  

So far I've only seen it on 2 titles.  On those 2 titles, the combing appears very infrequently; and when it does appear, it's not very distracting.

I tried looking for the combing artifact last night while I was watching Hitler - The Rise of Evil DVD on my 50C10 at 1080p.  
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/410Z8QBM1CL._SL160_AA115_.jpg)

I didn't see any combing artifact whatsoever.
  


My wife asked me to check that issue last night, it appeared on her "BATMAN: Forever" Region 3 DVD, while she was connected via components running 480p (P-Scan) on an XDE-500. Going 480i removed the issue, as well as going back to HDMI on a 720p resolution.

You think it's a dvd encoding error and not a T.V or a player issue? Nahahawa na ata missis ko sa akin ;D

Also, she picked up an old movie last night titled "The Killing Fields", since it's an old transfer it was very difficult to get the right setting. What's a good setting daw for movies like that? She loves it so much that we went over the show 2x yesterday (To my utter horror ;)).

Thank you as usual idol!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Sep 14, 2009 at 04:19 PM
My wife asked me to check that issue last night, it appeared on her "BATMAN: Forever" Region 3 DVD, while she was connected via components running 480p (P-Scan) on an XDE-500. Going 480i removed the issue, as well as going back to HDMI on a 720p resolution.

You think it's a dvd encoding error and not a T.V or a player issue? Nahahawa na ata missis ko sa akin ;D

I tested the Batman Forever DVD on my 50C10 and Pio 410 player, but I didn't see any combing artifacts.

However, I did see slight edge enhancement.  This is not an encoding error, but a deliberate attempt to sharpen the image artificially.  Edge enhancement was regularly applied by encoders on the old DVDs.  They used to be OK on small CRT TVs, but they're now more obvious on today's big flat panels.



Also, she picked up an old movie last night titled "The Killing Fields", ...

... She loves it so much that we went over the show 2x yesterday (To my utter horror ;)).

The Killing Fields is a good movie that I first saw in the 80's.  It was a real shocker at the time, when the terms "killing fields", "Khmer Rouge", and "Pol Pot" were only starting to enter public consciousness.

But even I can't watch it twice in a row. ...  Too depressing   :( .



...  it's an old transfer it was very difficult to get the right setting. What's a good setting daw for movies like that? ...

I just use my regular settings without additional tweaking.

There's really not much you can do about it.  It's a bad video transfer that looks like it already had bad film elements to start with.  

I don't see combing artifacts, but I do see edge enhancement and mosquito noise.  The picture is very soft, but applying sharpening enhancements on the player will only make the edge enhancement and mosquito noise even worse.

I tried 480p via component, and as expected, the image became softer.  Close-up shots were OK, but on far shots, fine detail is obviously lost.

On my Pio 410 player, 1080p or 720p outputs via HDMI still look best.


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 14, 2009 at 04:35 PM
@barrister

sorry, carlo made a mistake, it's BATMAN: Returns, not Forever! on Chapter 6...the part where batman speaks to commissioner gordon. the artifact was noticable when i was playing the dvd using compo cables at 480p. it disappeared when i was asked to switch back to hdmi/720p.

do you think movies like the killing fields will look better on a crt instead of the c10? (i really like the movie and will watch it again tonight)^^^

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Sep 14, 2009 at 04:48 PM
do you think movies like the killing fields will look better on a crt instead of the c10? (i really like the movie and will watch it again tonight)^^^

Killing Fields was one of the very first movies I watched in DVD (back in 1998) and even then, it was clearly the worst IQ among all DVD movies available - not much improvement from the S-VHS version.  I'm still waiting for a good remaster of that movie.

I still think that DVD and CRT (the real good quality ones) are closer to each other than A is to B.    But where will you find an HD CRT now?

Try mo naman ang Judgment At Nuremberg.   :)



Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 14, 2009 at 05:05 PM
Killing Fields was one of the very first movies I watched in DVD (back in 1998) and even then, it was clearly the worst IQ among all DVD movies available - not much improvement from the S-VHS version.  I'm still waiting for a good remaster of that movie.

I still think that DVD and CRT (the real good quality ones) are closer to each other than A is to B.    But where will you find an HD CRT now?

Try mo naman ang Judgment At Nuremberg.   :)

meron na po! just came in last week from amazon plus "The Pianist" on hddvd^^^

hoping they'd look great on the 50c10/42s10...i'll watch them sa weekend :) about the crt i gave on that already=)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Sep 14, 2009 at 05:10 PM
meron na po! just came in last week from amazon plus "The Pianist" on hddvd^^^
hoping they'd look great on the 50c10/42s10...i'll watch them sa weekend :)

Naku ang ganda naman ng combination  - Judgment At Nuremberg + The Pianist.   They both look great in high def (I have the downloadable type only but they looked awesome on the 50V plasma).

Judgment at Nuremberg made me skip (proper) lunch yesterday.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Sep 14, 2009 at 05:21 PM
@barrister

sorry, carlo made a mistake, it's BATMAN: Returns, not Forever! on Chapter 6...the part where batman speaks to commissioner gordon. the artifact was noticable when i was playing the dvd using compo cables at 480p. it disappeared when i was asked to switch back to hdmi/720p.

Sorry, I still can't see it on Chap. 6 of Batman Returns.  All I see is bad edge enhancement that was typical of the DVD releases of the day.

In my case, switching to HDMI 720p or 1080p improves sharpness.  It also changes black levels and colors.




do you think movies like the killing fields will look better on a crt instead of the c10? (i really like the movie and will watch it again tonight)^^^

Again?    :D

Yes, it will definitely look better on a small CRT TV.  That's not surprising since Standard DVD was in fact designed with CRT monitors in mind.

At any rate, tama si kuya Clondalkin. Killing Fields picture quality is really one of the worst ever.  No amount of tweaking will give you satisfactory results.  Only a good remaster can improve the quality substantially.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 14, 2009 at 05:31 PM
Naku ang ganda naman ng combination  - Judgment At Nuremberg + The Pianist.   They both look great in high def (I have the downloadable type only but they looked awesome on the 50V plasma).

Judgment at Nuremberg made me skip (proper) lunch yesterday.

hey i'm not some holocaust loving psycho chick ha^

by the way, i plan to connect my x-box360 on the 50c10 and do you think it's time for me to upgrade to an hdmi capable 360? yung 360 ko kasi 1st batch pa na japanese with just component cable connections. kaya pa naman yung 720p na rez.

salamat.

@barrister

cge! ii'll check it with a pioneer 410v, i was using the xde-500 kasi when i saw it on batman...

about the killing fields, i think i'll just live with it... too bad it's really a good movie.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Sep 14, 2009 at 05:46 PM
hey i'm not some holocaust loving psycho chick ha^

by the way, i plan to connect my x-box360 on the 50c10 and do you think it's time for me to upgrade to an hdmi capable 360? yung 360 ko kasi 1st batch pa na japanese with just component cable connections. kaya pa naman yung 720p na rez.


It's the quality of the movie, not the theme (although I read you like anything about history).  Eto pa Zwartboek in BD. 

We have the same batch of Xbox360 and I still watch HD DVD through it (with the add-on drive) via D-Terminal - exactly same quality as Component Video.   No plans of upgrading to an HDMI version unless my current unit dies.

Your family might be able to find a 36 inch wide HD CRT in the US - kahit pre-owned. 
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Sep 14, 2009 at 06:19 PM
@barrister

cge! ii'll check it with a pioneer 410v, i was using the xde-500 kasi when i saw it on batman...

Luma na talaga ang video transfer.  I doubt if you'll see much improvement using any DVD player.

Have you tried the Oppo players?



about the killing fields, i think i'll just live with it... too bad it's really a good movie.

Don't forget Hitler - The Rise of Evil.  It's a 2003 TV miniseries in 2 parts, starting from Hitler's childhood to his  ascendancy as Führer und Reichskanzler.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Sep 14, 2009 at 09:20 PM
Don't forget Hitler - The Rise of Evil.  It's a 2003 TV miniseries in 2 parts, starting from Hitler's childhood to his  ascendancy as Führer und Reichskanzler.

Sorry for the OT but cant help it.   This is one highly recommended movie.  Make sure not to start watching late because it would be difficult to stop.

Yuriko, question about Killing Fields dun sa final scene (the scene you've probably repeated like 10x already  ;D), the moment the Cambodian jumped on Sydney's arms and they embraced near the car, what exactly happened? How was the scene in relation to that great song in the background?   I'm asking you this because the original version I saw (probably in tape or in the moviehouse) was not the same as the DVD version.  The tape version was even more dramatic.

Ok para di OT.  50C10 is a great buy indeed but for similar amount of money, I would choose the smaller 42G10.  ;)


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Sep 14, 2009 at 10:57 PM
Ok para di OT.  50C10 is a great buy indeed but for similar amount of money, I would choose the smaller 42G10.  ;)
why?  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 15, 2009 at 12:41 AM
Have you tried the Oppo players?
Don't forget Hitler - The Rise of Evil.  It's a 2003 TV miniseries in 2 parts, starting from Hitler's childhood to his  ascendancy as Führer und Reichskanzler.

nope no oppo players here...cge i'll try the hitler mini series :)

Sorry for the OT but cant help it.   This is one highly recommended movie.  Make sure not to start watching late because it would be difficult to stop.

Yuriko, question about Killing Fields dun sa final scene (the scene you've probably repeated like 10x already  ;D), the moment the Cambodian jumped on Sydney's arms and they embraced near the car, what exactly happened? How was the scene in relation to that great song in the background?   I'm asking you this because the original version I saw (probably in tape or in the moviehouse) was not the same as the DVD version.  The tape version was even more dramatic.

Ok para di OT.  50C10 is a great buy indeed but for similar amount of money, I would choose the smaller 42G10.  ;)

the scene sa dvd had pran rushing to sydney (total tear jerker) and syd was apologising but dith was going "Nothing to forgive"...was there another scene to it? please tell me! please! (can't sleep tuloy)

sheesh back to topc:

why the g11 over something that gives you more screen size? the g11 has more detail, but you'd have to be close to see them. unless, you can see something my newbie eyes can't.

i hate saying this... kasi parang improper, but for me..."size matters" (sa t.v lang ha :D)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Sep 15, 2009 at 09:21 AM
the scene sa dvd had pran rushing to sydney (total tear jerker) and syd was apologising but dith was going "Nothing to forgive"...was there another scene to it? please tell me! please! (can't sleep tuloy)

This is what I remember on the non-DVD version.  The moment Pran jumped into Sydney's arms and they embraced, the scene was extended by panning the camera more than 360 degrees (dont remember how many turns exactly) to show every angle of the child-like tight embrace (Pran's legs both tighly wrapped around Sydney like a baby to a mother) and at the same time, the volume of the song Imagine was upped.  What I recall sa DVD version was there was no extended embrace, no 360 degree camera pan, but Sydney and Pran turned around fast while embracing, and the volume of the song Imagine remained low until after that "Nothing to forgive" and the credits started to appear.  Tama ba?



why the g11 over something that gives you more screen size? the g11 has more detail, but you'd have to be close to see them. unless, you can see something my newbie eyes can't.

i hate saying this... kasi parang improper, but for me..."size matters" (sa t.v lang ha :D)

This is an interesting argument for or against both.   But for these 2 particular models, and based on my observations of C10's closest sibling X10, the visual quality that the neoPDP is capable of is worth the compromise for the relatively smaller size - if the 50C10 and 42G10 are on similar price levels.  I like it smooth, I like it clean, I get distracted by the visible lines on the X10, I like having more latitude in effects of manual IQ settings and I like to connect to a PC.  Yes I agree that the IQ difference would diminish significantly as you sit farther but I like to have the option to sit as close as I want - just to appreciate the defiinition of the image to the max and para mas immersing ang experience, whether it be high def movie, high def gaming and also when I connect a digicam.   Naiilang ako and I tend to lose focus if I sit far from a TV.  Solution is to go even bigger at max resolution pero there is the usual budget constraint, and I cant go the projector option as I cant tolerate watching in the dark.

In any case, this is very subjective and for most people, TV size could be the highest priority when it comes to selecting a model.  Even in Panasonic Japan's Guide To Choosing An HDTV, the very first step is to choose the size.   ;)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: kalash on Sep 15, 2009 at 05:46 PM

why the g11 over something that gives you more screen size? the g11 has more detail, but you'd have to be close to see them. unless, you can see something my newbie eyes can't.


Does it mean that the gap between c10 and g11 in terms of color reproduction, black is black level and overall picture definition is quite close that the most noticeable difference is detail? If this is so, 50c10 would be a wise choice. I have not seen the g11 personally, but when looking at a Pioneer, I am still be wowed by it even if we already have a PV80 and this was what I was also expecting with the g11, a totally different viewing experience.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Invinciible on Sep 15, 2009 at 06:49 PM
Luma na talaga ang video transfer.  I doubt if you'll see much improvement using any DVD player.

Have you tried the Oppo players?



Don't forget Hitler - The Rise of Evil.  It's a 2003 TV miniseries in 2 parts, starting from Hitler's childhood to his  ascendancy as Führer und Reichskanzler.



is this the one starring the british actor robert carlyle as hitler?  pretty good watch if i remember correcctly...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: gaol on Sep 15, 2009 at 07:29 PM
Does it mean that the gap between c10 and g11 in terms of color reproduction, black is black level and overall picture definition is quite close that the most noticeable difference is detail? If this is so, 50c10 would be a wise choice. I have not seen the g11 personally, but when looking at a Pioneer, I am still be wowed by it even if we already have a PV80 and this was what I was also expecting with the g11, a totally different viewing experience.

I went around the past weeks checking out my options.

At SnS, I was able to see the 42G11 and the 50C10 play the same material (Ratatouille 720p I think). The difference/improvement in PQ of the G11 to me was evident, but the size of the 50C10 was very compelling, and for my use, I would have chosen the 50C10.

At TheaterWorks, the 42G11 and the 50PY800 were displayed side by side in a dim room showing a 1080p  WWII movie (the title escapes me right now). The G11 looked very very good, the PY800 was also very good--it's just that the G11 pips it.

At LIS, the 50G10 and the 50C10 were displayed side by side and I asked that they show the same material, at that time a Discovery HD cable program. The 50C10 looked good in itself, but the 50G10 looked better. One of the attendants said, just don't look at the the G10 and you'll be happy with the C10. Too late for me.  ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Sep 15, 2009 at 08:20 PM
is this the one starring the british actor robert carlyle as hitler?  pretty good watch if i remember correcctly...

Yes, Robert Carlyle:

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/af/Hitler_-_The_Rise_of_Evil.jpg/100px-Hitler_-_The_Rise_of_Evil.jpg)

YouTube trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qlp3VNWPta8

Picture quality is very good on my 50C10: good colors, sharp image, details in far shots are good.  However, a few seconds of slight posterization prevented its inclusion in my "Best DVD PQ" thread.  ;)




... One of the attendants said, just don't look at the the G10 and you'll be happy with the C10. Too late for me.  ;D

The G series must be really good.  Carlo777 says even SD-DVDs look better on the G than on the C.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Sep 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM
The 50C10 vs the 42G11 is the prime subject of most of the recent PM's I received right after I concluded the G11 review. And it's understandably so because, the price difference between the two is neck to neck.

For the record, I have both units, and therefore allow me to give out my subjective observation/s - That will hopefully help readers make the right choice.

The stuff on paper:

1)Contrast ratio

Looking at the C10 and the G11; They both bleed out 2,000,000 to 1 Dynamic contrast ratio's respectively, the G11 has a native contrast ratio of 40,000 to 1, while the C10 has 30,000 to 1. Both sport a 600hz subfeild drive.

What this means for us:

Well basically, both models can deliver deeper blacks and well pronounced colors. The 600hz subfeild drive enables smooth motion flow, allowing for less blur, pixelation (if any, if ever) for better over-all picture definition.

2)Resolution and "moving resolution"

The G11 sports a FULL HD panel with 1080p resolution, with a moving resolution of 1080. The C10 has a 720p native resolution with a moving resolution of somewhere around that area. The C10 is 1080p capable, but the model in it's self is not a FULL HD (1080p) panel, the difference between a 1080p capable unit and a FULL HD unit has been discussed a number of times within the forums, so please hit the search button for more information on this particular subject.

What this means for us:

Simply put; The higher the resolution, the higher the pixel count, and therefore - A model with the higher resolution will or should pump out better detail.

3)The size factor

50 inches for the C10, while 42 inches for the G11.

We will continue tomorrow, as we look at more paper specs and how these things actually came to play when I used them ;)


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Clondalkin on Sep 16, 2009 at 09:28 AM
1)Contrast ratio
Looking at the C10 and the G11; They both bleed out 2,000,000 to 1/40,000 to 1 contrast ratios, both models also sport a 600hz subfeild drive.

What this means for us:
Well basically, both models can deliver deeper blacks and well pronounced colors. The 600hz subfeild drive enables smooth motion flow, allowing for less blur, pixelation (if any, if ever) for better over-all picture definition.


Please check this out again Carlo.

AFAIK, only the Neo PDPs have 40K:1 contrast ratio.  The X series (similar to the C I guess) has 30K:1.  

And Im not sure if the 600hz subfield drive applies to Non-Neo PDP models as well because the video engine of the Neo PDP models is different from the non-full HD types.

However, specs for non-Japanese models may differ of course.

BTW, is your G11 capable of 48Hz and 96Hz mode under 24P?

Cheers

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Sep 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM

Please check this out again Carlo.

AFAIK, only the Neo PDPs have 40K:1 contrast ratio.  The X series (similar to the C I guess) has 30K:1.  

And Im not sure if the 600hz subfield drive applies to Non-Neo PDP models as well because the video engine of the Neo PDP models is different from the non-full HD types.

However, specs for non-Japanese models may differ of course.

BTW, is your G11 capable of 48Hz and 96Hz mode under 24P?

Cheers



Oops...updated already. Thank you!

The G11 is capable of 60hz mode under 24p (I'll check again)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: comitatus on Sep 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM
just a quick question...

how many colors can the C10 produce? the old pv70 claims to have 24 billion colors, thanks.

@clondalkin

i'll send you a pm lalang about the killing fields para hindi tayo off topic ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: rj_roze on Oct 19, 2009 at 06:27 AM
Hi Guys,

I've been a lurker in this forum for many months, but this is my first post so pardon the lack of structure. I got the Panasonic 42c10 last September from SnS and just recently completed the 100 hour break-in.
I won't go very deep on my review as there has been countless of those already. Instead I'll just go with some of the issues that buyers seriously considering this model might be concerned.

1. Let's start with Screen Reflectivity as this seems to be the biggest feedback provided by others. Under normal lighting conditions (used this on my living room) it was no biggie really. Issue is only apparent during dark scenes (funny that I could clearly see my reflection during brief moments in which the TV is displaying a totally black picture).

2. I have not really noticed the infamous phosphor lag, my untrained eye probably is not good enough to notice it. I do notice judders when scenes are panned slowly. It’s really terrible, seems to be more noticeable on DVDs though.

3. Last issue I’d like to raise was color banding (not sure if this is the correct term, newbie ). This is the ring like formation you notice around the sun, or the moon. The TV seems to be bad in reproducing subtle changes in color gradations. I have to admit that I have only tried using the TV on DVDs, not sure if the issue would be noticeable when viewing Hi-Def contents.

Over-all the issues I raised are not really deal breakers but rather imperfections that can be attributed to the TVs relatively low price point. I got mine at 40K so I’m not really complaining. For all the things you are getting, it’s really an amazing TV, totally a bang for our hard earned buck!

By the way I have been using the monitor as my primary HTPC display and it is just doing wonders. When using the TrueMotion feature of PowerDVD 9, the issues with panning judders are totally eliminated. ;D ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: merdenoms on Oct 21, 2009 at 12:53 AM
olrayti! thanks for the heads up... mukhang 42c10 na talaga bibilhin ko for Christmas. For HTPC purposes din kasi yung akin(wala pang pambili ng bluray). Musta yung desktop? laki ba ng icons? how's the quality?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: rj_roze on Oct 21, 2009 at 11:07 PM
On Windows Vista Ultimate, ok na ok. I'm using 1366x768 na resolution. Just make sure na lakihan mo din ung DPI settings mo to 120, that way text could easily be readable even from 6 feet away.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Nov 12, 2009 at 07:54 PM
Hi Teams SnS, TW,

Pls advise when the 42C10 will become available again?

Thanks  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: slayersburns on Nov 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM
hello pdvd!

how 'bout panaA10? how much po kaya? please advise mga experts!

thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Hot Mama on Nov 23, 2009 at 03:40 PM
Hi Teams SnS, TW,

Pls advise when the 42C10 will become available again?

Thanks  :)


Meron na 42C10 sa SnS. Got mine last week!

Here are my comments (not as detailed as Carlo777 reviews) ;D

1. Color, contrast, overall PQ is great! Am at this point just using Component 480p connection from DVD.

2. Sound, overall audio quality is also great.

3. What bothers me about the 42C10 are the controls. For instance, changing the viewing mode between Normal, Cinema, Dynamic, requires to enter the menu setup. Sana may short cut button since this setting changes a lot when i watch in different lighting conditions.

4. The aspect button has a shortcut button though. But since the DVD/film has different aspect ratio as well, i keep on switching to different modes (since bago pa at break in period to prevent image retention). I do notice that computer animated films (Shrek, Bee Movie, etc) are formatted 16:9... Thus the screen is filled up. For those 2.35:1 movies, the black bars appear. To eliminate the bars, i set to Zoom1... which unfortunately distorts the picture - medyo oblong ang bilog. However, the manual indicates that Zoom1 simply zooms the picture whether 16:9 or 4:3...Why ??? The Just setting is good for watching 4:3 format.

5. I dont have cable at home. Actually, wala sa Phase ng village namin... so i bear with VHF/UHF signals. My exeprience with Panasonic TV is the cumbersome channel settings...including the 42C10. It seems there are slots and you have to tune in the channel individually. Ex., slot 1 = ch2 ABS, slot2=ch4 NBN, slot3=ch5 TV5, slot4=ch7 GMA, and so fort. Thus, pressing the channel number, ex. 02, channel 4 is displayed instead. You have to manually arrange it... much worse, yung channel 25 (NET25) ay naka slot sa ch 72!

I guess its time to check out the satellite TV service.

6. The manual isnt that helpful either. Descriptions and specifications are not that thorough

7. One last thing to the experts here... as i am really quite worried about the image retention (IR) thing with plasma (or should i be?)...

Reviews state that to prevent IR, the TV should not display stationary objects on screen (Channel logo, black bars from DVD playback) for the first 100 hours of viewing. While there is no harm in following this "rule", my question is -

How long really does an image have to be displayed constantly on screen for the image to be retained?
Were there tests done on plasma (better if with C10) on image retention? Baka may documents from Panasonic (or other expert groups).

Cheers! :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Nov 23, 2009 at 04:32 PM
Meron na 42C10 sa SnS. Got mine last week!

Here are my comments (not as detailed as Carlo777 reviews) ;D

1. Color, contrast, overall PQ is great! Am at this point just using Component 480p connection from DVD.

that is one of the advantage of plasma  :)  

2. Sound, overall audio quality is also great.

yup, tv speakers are good enough for movies that does not need 5.1 e.g. drama and comedy

3. What bothers me about the 42C10 are the controls. For instance, changing the viewing mode between Normal, Cinema, Dynamic, requires to enter the menu setup. Sana may short cut button since this setting changes a lot when i watch in different lighting conditions.

ganyan din ako nung una, masasanay karin, although ive been using ECO for a while now

4. The aspect button has a shortcut button though. But since the DVD/film has different aspect ratio as well, i keep on switching to different modes (since bago pa at break in period to prevent image retention). I do notice that computer animated films (Shrek, Bee Movie, etc) are formatted 16:9... Thus the screen is filled up. For those 2.35:1 movies, the black bars appear. To eliminate the bars, i set to Zoom1... which unfortunately distorts the picture - medyo oblong ang bilog. However, the manual indicates that Zoom1 simply zooms the picture whether 16:9 or 4:3...Why ??? The Just setting is good for watching 4:3 format.

how about the zoom of your player?  btw most of the time zoom1 auto fills the screen, but in some cases, it zooms like a normal "digital zoom" and is ugly, di kasi pantay   :-\



5. I dont have cable at home. Actually, wala sa Phase ng village namin... so i bear with VHF/UHF signals. My exeprience with Panasonic TV is the cumbersome channel settings...including the 42C10. It seems there are slots and you have to tune in the channel individually. Ex., slot 1 = ch2 ABS, slot2=ch4 NBN, slot3=ch5 TV5, slot4=ch7 GMA, and so fort. Thus, pressing the channel number, ex. 02, channel 4 is displayed instead. You have to manually arrange it... much worse, yung channel 25 (NET25) ay naka slot sa ch 72!

I guess its time to check out the satellite TV service.

can't really comment about this since im using cable since day one :D
i did try aerial antenna for a day, just to see how it would perform, if incase id need it  ;D ;D



6. The manual isnt that helpful either. Descriptions and specifications are not that thorough

i agree. but in a week or two you should be able to "master" the remote etc.

7. One last thing to the experts here... as i am really quite worried about the image retention (IR) thing with plasma (or should i be?)...

others would advise you to ZOOM it for 100 hours.  for me i just did a white wash for 24 hours (did this on the 2nd day, no IR that lasted longer than 10minutes so far ;)

Reviews state that to prevent IR, the TV should not display stationary objects on screen (Channel logo, black bars from DVD playback) for the first 100 hours of viewing. While there is no harm in following this "rule", my question is -

How long really does an image have to be displayed constantly on screen for the image to be retained?
Were there tests done on plasma (better if with C10) on image retention? Baka may documents from Panasonic (or other expert groups).

Cheers! :)
my non expert anwers Hot Mama .. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ryanamontos on Nov 24, 2009 at 03:04 AM
Hi guys,

Did anyone tried buying plasma tv from US then shipping it here in PH? Planning to buy this in US http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P42X1-42-Inch-Plasma/dp/B001SE4YQS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=tv&qid=1259000349&sr=1-1

Thanks everyone!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: james16 on Nov 27, 2009 at 01:28 AM
after several months of reading and waiting, finally got the 42c10, although it seems a bit soft for me, hopefully in due time, break-in perhaps, pq would improve.

trying to avoid watching it in the correct aspect ratio and zoom it (hopefully i could wait for that 100 hrs), for break-in based on most people do here

hopefully i will get used to the cinema and arm color settings as well as i find it yellowish, i overcame that when i was using 32lx80 then and found it much better through time
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: mrclark on Nov 27, 2009 at 02:13 PM
I got my 42C10 last august.  I did noticed an improvement in the PQ. Not sure if it's the plasma's adjustment, or it was just maybe our cable operator (Destiny) made some improvement.
Whenever I watched cable tv, I set the Picture setting to Cinema.
But when I watched DVDs, I set it to Normal setting.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: RastaSega on Nov 27, 2009 at 04:06 PM
HOT MAMA.

for the "manual setting" maybe you're in "cable" mode kaya kailangan iset lahat manually.

try putting it on TV mode then do a sweep again of the channels.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: watson's box on Nov 28, 2009 at 11:43 PM
Hi guys, we just got our 42c10 this weekend and im pretty impressed by it. I would like to ask though if anyone can share their picture settings? And what's with the "breaking in" part? I am not too familiar with this.


Thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: SymphonyX7 on Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM
Been away from PinoyDVD for a while since we got our P42C10 this September. Anyway, I'm quite sure we're well over the prescribed "break-in" period of 100 hours. We've set the TV to "cinema" and it's still in cinema mode until now. Now we're not noticing any of the supposed image quality improvements of breaking in.

Can anyone help me or at least refer to me a site or place that will help me calibrate our TV?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Nov 29, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Hi Guys,

Just would like to share my 42C10 settings...

Watching movies via HDMI:

Mode: Normal
Contrast: 60
Brightness: +2
Color: 40
Sharpness: 70
Tint: 0
Color Balance: Normal
Color Mgmt: All off

Watching TV via Cable:

Mode: Normal
Contrast: 55
Brightness: +2
Color: 40
Sharpness: 50
Tint: 0
Color Balance: Normal
Color Mgmt: All off

BTW, I'm using Pio 610 upscaler for DVD, & Skycable with catv booster.

Regards  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: james16 on Nov 29, 2009 at 08:39 AM
Hi Guys,

Just would like to share my 42C10 settings...

Watching movies via HDMI:

Mode: Normal
Contrast: 60
Brightness: +2
Color: 40
Sharpness: 70
Tint: 0
Color Balance: Normal
Color Mgmt: All off

Watching TV via Cable:

Mode: Normal
Contrast: 55
Brightness: +2
Color: 40
Sharpness: 50
Tint: 0
Color Balance: Normal
Color Mgmt: All off

BTW, I'm using Pio 610 upscaler for DVD, & Skycable with catv booster.

Regards  :)


thanks :) this will help
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Rakenrol on Nov 29, 2009 at 05:05 PM
Mga Sir,

Newbie lang po, Medyo mag OT lang. Ive been lurking here for for a long time na and will be buying my 1st LCD/Plasma this December. What do you think is worth to get, 37x10 or 42c10? or if you have any suggestions? My budget is around 35-40T for it.

Once i have an extra budget this year im planning to buy an upscaling DVD player also, and for next year a PS3 for Bluray and games.


Thank you very much
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: guido on Nov 29, 2009 at 08:17 PM
42c10 na syempre. bigger is always better. opinion ko lang yan ha.
i also was in the same boat six months ago. sabi ko pwede na 37in. but the 42 is within my budget so yun kinuha ko. around 40k na lang yata 42c10 ngayon.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: SymphonyX7 on Nov 29, 2009 at 08:25 PM
Mga Sir,

Newbie lang po, Medyo mag OT lang. Ive been lurking here for for a long time na and will be buying my 1st LCD/Plasma this December. What do you think is worth to get, 37x10 or 42c10? or if you have any suggestions? My budget is around 35-40T for it.

Once i have an extra budget this year im planning to buy an upscaling DVD player also, and for next year a PS3 for Bluray and games.


Thank you very much

I'm no professional. But I've got a friend who bought the 42" X10 Full HD LCD Panasonic since it was cheaper (he got it 65K at Anson's Makati as well). He bought it cause the plasma S10 was 79K and he really didn't care cause all he wanted was 1080p. I'd have to say our 42" C10 which is 720p still blows his out of the water when it comes to overall picture quality. Can't wait to invite him to my house. :D I'm so evil I want to rub it in his face. LOL.

Anyway, it's a mixed bag for games though. His TV is sharper when it comes to games (perhaps cause it's native 1080p?) but it doesn't have that "wow" effect that will make you want to approach the TV if you happen to pass by. The colors weren't as realistic and accurate, they were overly vibrant and bright... and playing on it for about 2 hours straight actually strained my eyes a bit. I don't know if it's just me, but it's not as gentle on the eyes compared to our plasma. The test equipment is an Xbox 360 via HDMI outputting 1080p. Thankfully our C10 accepts 1080p despite being a 720p only panel.

For movies? Wow... They're not even close! I don't know if the Panasonic LCDs have 24p playback, but the plasmas apparently do cause when the PS3 and WD HD tried to go "1080p 24 Hz" mode, our C10 accepted it without problems. What I noticed is that it gives it that smooth look that you get from "120 Hz LCDs" but it's less pronounced and doesn't look artificial. It really makes our viewing experience so much better and it gives guests that enter our den that "wow!" look when we watch movies on it. Too bad it only works if your output device supports it. It doesn't work on sources that don't have 24 Hz mode like regular cable. The 120 Hz LCDs smoothens the motion from any source I believe though IMO, I don't like the effect. Too artificial and it looks like it's ghosting. I'm never going back to LCDs when it comes to movies.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Nov 30, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Bought another 42C10 last Sat & delivered as scheduled yesterday!
Thanks to Mr Vic & the staff of SnS for great customer service!

 :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Rakenrol on Nov 30, 2009 at 03:03 PM
Salamat mga sir,

Im leaning towards the 42xc10. Im just worried about the image retention, but as the other threads say theres a way naman to fix it
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: francois on Nov 30, 2009 at 05:23 PM
Salamat mga sir,

Im leaning towards the 42xc10. Im just worried about the image retention, but as the other threads say theres a way naman to fix it

Go for the 42 Rakenrol! Madali mo makakaliitan yung 37.
Nothing to worry about the image retention. Normal watching clears it if any at all.

 ;)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Rakenrol on Dec 02, 2009 at 10:20 PM
Another question mga sir,

Is it true the mahal and mahirap ang maintenance ng 42c10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: SpoonEK9 on Dec 03, 2009 at 01:25 AM
i just bought 50C10. ask ko lang po kung ano sinelect ninyong region for cable tv. meron po kasi Asia, American CATV etc. pinili ko po yung American CATV. medyo d kasi ako satisfied sa PQ compared sa PQ ng 42PV80 ko. so ask ko lang baka better yung settings ninyo.

also, talaga bang manually mo iseset yung mga channels? sa PV80 kasi automatic na e.

thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: rain021 on Dec 06, 2009 at 06:31 PM
We just ordered 42c10(+ samsung tallboy), idedeliver sa thursday. Any tips for newbies? Anong rule dun sa break-in period? TV will be mainly used for htpc, wii, and cable.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: red317 on Dec 06, 2009 at 09:37 PM
Mga sirs, how much nyo po nakuha yung 42C10 and saan? I'm really considering this model. Question ko lang din po, nawa-wall mount po ba sya? wala kc akong nakitang parang mga holes sa likod for wall mounting? TIA. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Dec 06, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Mga sirs, how much nyo po nakuha yung 42C10 and saan? I'm really considering this model. Question ko lang din po, nawa-wall mount po ba sya? wala kc akong nakitang parang mga holes sa likod for wall mounting? TIA. :)
pwede i wallmount.  madalas may nakatakip na plastic cover yung mounting holes.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Hot Mama on Dec 07, 2009 at 03:11 PM
After two weeks of watching... i think about 6-8 hrs a day, i think i have reached my break in period...

Question/observation lang din on the image retention issue...

1. The owners manual says IR is not a defect... so why should we worry? Is IR permanent?
2. I plugged in a videoke machine on the 42C10 and after two hours, some images, yung mga reserved songs) are retained when the screen displays a blank screen (ex. selecting an AV input with no signal) on a totally dark room.
3. After another day of movie viewing, nawala na rin yung videoke images. Napalitan naman nung mga black bars noong movie.
4. Hindi naman visible yung mga images when watching content under normal conditions.
5. You can also see image retained by displaying a blank screen in "Normal Mode" then show the menu windows. After exiting the window, you will see the image retained on the screen. It is best observed with the room lights turned off.

Share ko lang.  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Dec 09, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Image retention is a part of the plasma experience, what you're describing is actually something I've seen on nearly all my plasma units (C10,S10,G11). But, it's normal and should go away with new content viewing.

Let me tell you guys a very recent "issue" I had with the C10...

I was watching a smut dvd, when after the show, I decided to play my usual MMORPG. I played the game like mad that I forgot to switch off the dvd and the T.V! The dvd options menu left an imprint on the screen and was very visible on a blank input screen! You don't even have to close the lights to see it fully.

Here is the best part, my wife, forumer comitatus, walks in and asks me why I'm still up. I casually said, "I'm just removing some I.R", and she goes, "Oh, what I.R?, can I see it nga?". Long and short, she went to a blank screen and saw the retained images of scene chapters with very sleazy titles! :o

Anyway, to remove all sorts of images from previous content. I simply play a full screen cartoon and usually these retained images wash away after the show.

 :D :D :D
 


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: RastaSega on Dec 09, 2009 at 11:37 AM
bakit pamahal ng pamahal ngayon ang 42c10?!?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ferdinand on Dec 09, 2009 at 11:58 AM
bakit pamahal ng pamahal ngayon ang 42c10?!?
Sir Holiday Season !!! Babagsak  presyo next year.  kung bibili kayo, delay ninyo
muna.   
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: RastaSega on Dec 09, 2009 at 01:32 PM
that's the plan alright :)
ready na sana to get the 42c10 kaso imbes na bumaba lalong nagtataas ang presyo.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: frequenzy on Dec 09, 2009 at 08:15 PM
coming from a 32" ok na ok talaga ang 42c10. halos 2weeks pa lang pero so far so good. i mainly use it for PS3 and sulit talaga for it's price.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: juanch on Dec 09, 2009 at 11:41 PM
I have no plasma experience yet.
But I'd like to know if it's okay to turn off the the set immediately w/o washing out the IR first?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Dec 10, 2009 at 12:01 AM
I have no plasma experience yet.
But I'd like to know if it's okay to turn off the the set immediately w/o washing out the IR first?

Yes, I do that all the time! The only time I get to do a little I.R wash is when I play a lot of PS3 or when I forget to switch off dvd menu's ;)

In all honesty, we don't even have to do it.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: DonMiguel85 on Dec 10, 2009 at 09:17 AM
I have no plasma experience yet.
But I'd like to know if it's okay to turn off the the set immediately w/o washing out the IR first?
There's no need for that with modern plasmas. Even leaving a static image on for a week won't cause permanent burn-in.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Lotur on Dec 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Hello everyone! Some n0ob question lang sana to our plasma peeps:
I was wondering if pano gawin yung 100 hr burn in? Plano ko sana magupgrde to 50in plasma from Lcd soon. Tia! =)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: retro12195 on Dec 10, 2009 at 01:19 PM
bakit pamahal ng pamahal ngayon ang 42c10?!?
last two weeks 42k sa theaterworks.magkano na ba ngayon? >:(
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: rain021 on Dec 10, 2009 at 11:07 PM
Dumating na rin! I have a few Qs tho:

1. Pano yung break-in?
2. Pwede makahingi ng settings for watching TV and movies.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: blued888 on Dec 10, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Hello everyone! Some n0ob question lang sana to our plasma peeps:
I was wondering if pano gawin yung 100 hr burn in? Plano ko sana magupgrde to 50in plasma from Lcd soon. Tia! =)

Master Burn-in/break-in Thread (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=608677) @ AVS Forum

Download Break In DVD And SVCD (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=583089) @ AVS Forum
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: eoman on Dec 11, 2009 at 07:16 AM
last two weeks 42k sa theaterworks.magkano na ba ngayon? >:(

A wooping 49.5k.. 7.5k increase agad konte nalang HTIB na sana.. Baka next year nalang tuloy ako kumuha ng 42C10..

Not sure if SnS increased their price as well..
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Munskie on Dec 11, 2009 at 08:19 AM
Go look for Mang Sonny in SGT HomeTheater......he'll give you a very good deal for the 42C10.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: mcjefferson on Dec 11, 2009 at 07:47 PM
ok ba sa cable viewing ang 42c10?
balak ko kasi benta 32x10 ko and switch to plasma tv.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ferdinand on Dec 11, 2009 at 08:02 PM
A wooping 49.5k.. 7.5k increase agad konte nalang HTIB na sana.. Baka next year nalang tuloy ako kumuha ng 42C10..

Not sure if SnS increased their price as well..
Sa Listening Room (megamall) , Last Sunday i dropped-by to their store, 44k.  binibigay.   Next year na lang bumili, tignan natin kung hindi nila ibaba yan.   :D :D :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: RastaSega on Dec 12, 2009 at 12:04 AM
hehehehe. i'm hanging on to my money till someone gets back to a reasonable price . muntik na ako bumili kaso nagtaasan ng presyo.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Dec 12, 2009 at 03:30 AM
A wooping 49.5k.. 7.5k increase agad konte nalang HTIB na sana.. Baka next year nalang tuloy ako kumuha ng 42C10..

Not sure if SnS increased their price as well..
afaik those are units with local (panasonic phils) warranty, kaya may kamahalan.  im not sure though, better ask jeff  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: bladecutter_ph on Dec 12, 2009 at 07:51 PM
Sa Listening Room (megamall) , Last Sunday i dropped-by to their store, 44k.  binibigay.   Next year na lang bumili, tignan natin kung hindi nila ibaba yan.   :D :D :D

I just checked 42C10 in Sights N Sounds today and they're giving it at 42k still.

And by the way, I'm contemplating to get Sanyo 42E30F (priced at 42k) and comparing it side by side with 42C10 showed below average color display. It reveals reddish tone than 42C10 and Samsung. Am an amateur critic but this is the obvious difference my eyes caught while comparing them.

So I'll get 42C10 instead, maybe next week.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: anya618 on Dec 12, 2009 at 07:56 PM
question on 50c10, malaking ba difference nito sa other brands na 42" full hd considering 720p lang ung 50c10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: eoman on Dec 21, 2009 at 01:38 AM
Just got my 42C10 from SnS, considering I came from a CRT TV I think its a good jump based on user reviews and actual performance of the unit. But I'm a little disappointed when it played some of my standart quality(640x480) movies its blurry and the pictures are not that quite good, I dunno if its the player or its just the media that I used, maybe jumping from CRT -> HD TV also needs jumping of Ordinary DVDs to HD DVDs.

Question with HTIBs with upscaling capabilities..
Does it also upscale divx/avi files burned on dvds? or does it only upscale dvd format movies?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: juanch on Dec 21, 2009 at 07:17 AM
What's your DVD player? Is it upscaled?
Also what type of connection are you feeding the TV? HDMI or Composite lang?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: bladecutter_ph on Dec 21, 2009 at 09:14 AM
Just got my new 42C10 and I must say this Plasma tv is really impressive. Have been reading some reviews about this item and just want to confirm some. The unit should be in dark room, as it reflects all lights fronting the screen. This is really one disadvantage which I believe X10 series have already resolved with their anti-glare feature. So I would just switch off lights and only one lamp with soft-tone yellow besides the plasma panel, the effect is just awesome. I've never seen colors coming out so rich and clear. I've owned 37 LCD Samsung and it doesn't match the movie effect. With the LCD I don't have any problem with light reflection as LCDs have anti-glare on it. But who would care about lights when you want to have a new experience with movies right in your own bedroom.



Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Dec 21, 2009 at 09:33 AM
... But I'm a little disappointed when it played some of my standart quality(640x480) movies its blurry and the pictures are not that quite good, I dunno if its the player or its just the media that I used, maybe jumping from CRT -> HD TV also needs jumping of Ordinary DVDs to HD DVDs.

The C10's internal scaler is not good enough.  For standard DVD sources, it needs to be fed a good 1080p or 720p HDMI signal from a good DVD player.  Otherwise, you'll get a softer picture.

Please browse my 50C10 review for standard DVD:

http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=96467.msg1036848#msg1036848
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: anya618 on Dec 21, 2009 at 09:42 AM
saw this at western trinoma last night
42c10 at 44k cash
50c10 at 72k cash
add 13k for htib pt570

not sure if me tawad pa
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: eoman on Dec 21, 2009 at 10:56 AM
What's your DVD player? Is it upscaled?
Also what type of connection are you feeding the TV? HDMI or Composite lang?

Not sure of the model of the player but its a pioneer in SnS that is used. Hmm Siguro hindi nga sya na upscale since salpak then play lang agad yung ginawa. Connection used is HDMI
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: eoman on Dec 21, 2009 at 11:46 AM
The C10's internal scaler is not good enough.  For standard DVD sources, it needs to be fed a good 1080p or 720p HDMI signal from a good DVD player.  Otherwise, you'll get a softer picture.

Please browse my 50C10 review for standard DVD:

http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=96467.msg1036848#msg1036848


Thanks a lot! Very nice review. I think we didn't do an upscale when I tested the unit thats why its too soft for me.

btw can DVD players upscale divx/avi files?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Dec 22, 2009 at 11:44 AM
btw can DVD players upscale divx/avi files?

Yes, players also upscale low-res media files.  Expect picture quality to be worse than standard DVD, but if you're playing a high-quality avi, artifacts will be minimal.  
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Lotur on Dec 23, 2009 at 07:53 PM
LoturRandoms

My 50C10 finally arrived :)
Thanksvm to Carlo777 and the plasma peeps here for all the tips! :)
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/DSC_2846.jpg)

50C10 Panasonic Plasma bound to replace my Samsung LA32R81 LCD
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/pDSC_2683.jpg)

Installed and in place, thanks to Dom of Pdvd for the great customer service
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/pDSC_2677.jpg)

Made an impromptu photo review of the 50C10, went with dynamic mode during the tests but returned to normal mode shortly to begin my break in period

Blu Ray
Holy cow, the movie grain PQ is superb
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/bDSC_2512.jpg)
The black levels are unlike what the R81 can offer

(http://[http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_b.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=b.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_bDSC_2488.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=bDSC_2488.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_bDSC_2494.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=bDSC_2494.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_bDSC_2500.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=bDSC_2500.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_bDSC_2509.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=bDSC_2509.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_bDSC_2511.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=bDSC_2511.jpg)

DVD
Looks great at 720p, the vibrant colors, sharpness and contrast meshes wonderfully well and non-eye straining
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/dDSC_2859.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_dDSC_2465.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=dDSC_2465.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_dDSC_2466.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=dDSC_2466.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_dDSC_2473.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=dDSC_2473.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_dDSC_2853.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=dDSC_2853.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_dDSC_2854.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=dDSC_2854.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_dDSC_2855.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=dDSC_2855.jpg)

tests to be continued (prolly games and movie downloads next)
thanks for looking! :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: DonMiguel85 on Dec 24, 2009 at 04:50 AM
^A Super NES and GameCube! You, sir, are a man of taste. Care to take pictures of the SNES' graphics on the TV? I'd like too see how good they scale up.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Dec 24, 2009 at 12:00 PM
@Lotur

New T'v's with boxes never fail to floor me^^^

I'm glad you have your new unit now! You and my wife have very similar tastes in gaming...She still has the Super-Famicom and the Saturn along with the Dreamcast and a host of other old systems!

She was just playing Vampire Savior for the Saturn on our C10 last night=)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Lotur on Dec 24, 2009 at 01:19 PM
@donmig
thanks sir! :)
sure thing, will set up my SNES when i get the chance. i last made a test run a couple of years ago with the unit using my old R81, im also curious how it upscales on the 50C10 ;D


@carlo
thanks man! your tips were spot on! the plasma experience is awesome and the screen upgrade is very well worth it :)

i think im gonna have a hard time viewing movies/games on smaller screens due to this ;D
btw pre whats your suggested 50C10 settings calibration after the break-in period?

dang... vampire savior, brings a lot of memories :)
glad to hear she is also into gaming, i was a videogame buff in my younger days but mostly into graphics appreciation and nostalgia trips na lang ngayon, although fighting and sports game get me hooked at times :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Lotur on Dec 24, 2009 at 02:02 PM
LoturRandoms
50C10 test shots

Howdy peeps!
As promised here is the rest of the 50C10 photo review
Admittedly i was intimated by the 50-inch screen at the beginning ;D had to tone down the contrast during dynamic mode before settling down to a suitable viewing distance to get shots

PS3
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2520.jpg)


Resident Evil 4
TO be honest i miss the zombie, suspense-filled gameplay of the original, but then again i think Capcom did a very good job reinventing the series.
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2851.jpg)

MGS 4
Solid Snake's last hurrah :)
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2477.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2488.jpg)


Tekken 6
My fave fighting game of all time ;D
This was the very reason i bought a PS3 :agree:
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_25232.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2523.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2549.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2546.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_25492.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_25632.jpg)


NBA 2K10
Random game between the Rockets and the Knicks
Yao benched to avoid another injury :rofl:
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_27582.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gCSC_28083.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2759.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2782.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_g2.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=g2.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_g.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=g.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gCSC_2792.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gCSC_2792.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gCSC_2808.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gCSC_2808.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_27582.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_27582.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2758.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2758.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2759.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2759.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2761.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2761.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2762.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2762.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2765.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2765.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2771.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2771.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_27782.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_27782.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2778.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2778.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2780.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2780.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2782.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2782.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_27892.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_27892.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2789.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2789.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2790.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2790.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2793.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2793.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_28022.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_28022.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2802.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2802.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2806.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2806.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2810.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2810.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2812.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2812.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2813.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2813.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2815.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2815.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2819.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2819.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2820.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2820.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_28242.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_28242.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2824.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2824.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_28262.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_28262.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2826.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2826.jpg)



Street Fighter 4
Whenever i play SF i remember the good old days back in Reeno's Megamall B LG. We made a daily trek after class just to satiate our fighting game hunger lol
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2563.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2637.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2658.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2627.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2639.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_26452.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2645.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_26212.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2655.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2651.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2601.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/gDSC_2607.jpg)



(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2698.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2698.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2700.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2700.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_27432.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_27432.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2746.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2746.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_27522.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_27522.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2752.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2752.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gsf2.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gsf2.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gsf.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gsf.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_25732.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_25732.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_26202.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_26202.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2620.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2620.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_26212.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_26212.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2621.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2621.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2622.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2622.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2627.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2627.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_26362.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_26362.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2636.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2636.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2637.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2637.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_26392.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_26392.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2639.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2639.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2643.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2643.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_26452.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_26452.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2645.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2645.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2648.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2648.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2649.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2649.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2651.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2651.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2653.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2653.jpg)(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_2655.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_2655.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/th_gDSC_26582.jpg) (http://s627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/?action=view&current=gDSC_26582.jpg)


Pacquiao v Cotto (HD download)
Wapakman LOL
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/DSC_2913.jpg)

Idol Manny being interview by HBO
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/DSC_2880.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/DSC_2885.jpg)

Cotto... dayum Pac bust him up real bad
(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/DSC_2906.jpg)

(http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt357/gibemp3d/DVD/DSC_2900.jpg)


Thats it for my photo review, as with most the tech reviews made by our experts i have to really agree with them.
Outside the reflectivity issues this TV is a must have for any Plasma lover.

Will prepare another photoshoot batch once my break in period is complete.
Thanks for viewing and Merry Xmas everyone! :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Dec 24, 2009 at 04:27 PM
During the "Break-in" period I use these settings;

Mode: Cinema

Contrast: 48
Brightness: -1
Color: 50
Sharpness: 49
Temp: Warm or Normal
Tint: 0
C.Management: Off

Nice shots^
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Lotur on Dec 24, 2009 at 05:24 PM
^thanks!
how about after the break in?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: thebat on Jan 04, 2010 at 11:34 AM
Meron add sa newspaper (Inquirer) P38,888 lang! Pwede COD. Sa metrowalk 2nd floor daw showroom nila. I'll try to check their showroom this week.

Sana bumaba pa to.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: DonMiguel85 on Jan 04, 2010 at 11:36 AM
Meron add sa newspaper (Inquirer) P38,888 lang! Pwede COD. Sa metrowalk 2nd floor daw showroom nila. I'll try to check their showroom this week.

Sana bumaba pa to.
Metrowalk? Be careful...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: thebat on Jan 04, 2010 at 11:39 AM
Metrowalk? Be careful...

Bakit sir? Pirated din ba to ;D ;D?
Yun add nila sabi main office nila sa shaw. They also have 1yr warranty.
Gray units kaya to?

Try to read their add sa Inquirer. Need your opinion on this din. Ty!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: trigo on Jan 04, 2010 at 03:14 PM
Bakit sir? Pirated din ba to ;D ;D?
Yun add nila sabi main office nila sa shaw. They also have 1yr warranty.
Gray units kaya to?

Try to read their add sa Inquirer. Need your opinion on this din. Ty!

what page of inquirer today sir? i can't seem to find it.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: thebat on Jan 04, 2010 at 04:15 PM
what page of inquirer today sir? i can't seem to find it.

Wala silang add today, I checked. But last week before new year halos araw araw akita ko yung add. I even clipped it.

Here is the cell number: 09228575366.
Btw, cell phone numbers lang nakalagay and no landlines. ???
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: vx2 on Jan 04, 2010 at 05:01 PM
I don't doubt it, someone posted inside information a few weeks ago that the 42c10s will drop to around 37k.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: eoman on Jan 04, 2010 at 05:02 PM
Hi fellow C10 owners

Just wanna ask if any of you are encountering this problem.

When I turn on my 42C10 there are times that my picture settings is being reset to default. Is this normal?

My 42C10 is plugged on an 1000w voltage regulator and is always being turned off everytime its not in use. (power off via remote and off on avr)

I usually dont turn off the button thats in front of the tv, the one that allows you to turn the tv on standby.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: abcerase on Jan 05, 2010 at 06:24 AM
Wala silang add today, I checked. But last week before new year halos araw araw akita ko yung add. I even clipped it.

Here is the cell number: 09228575366.
Btw, cell phone numbers lang nakalagay and no landlines. ???

I am not sure if this is the one: (i found it in tpc being sold by lanchawbin, quezon city-based)

http://tipidpc.com/viewitem.php?iid=4809093
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: DonMiguel85 on Jan 05, 2010 at 06:44 AM
Wala silang add today, I checked. But last week before new year halos araw araw akita ko yung add. I even clipped it.

Here is the cell number: 09228575366.
Btw, cell phone numbers lang nakalagay and no landlines. ???
Sounds a bit fly-by-night, if possible try to access the service menu to check the TV's hours of usage too.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Stagea on Jan 05, 2010 at 07:16 AM
Hi fellow C10 owners

Just wanna ask if any of you are encountering this problem.

When I turn on my 42C10 there are times that my picture settings is being reset to default. Is this normal?

My 42C10 is plugged on an 1000w voltage regulator and is always being turned off everytime its not in use. (power off via remote and off on avr)

I usually dont turn off the button thats in front of the tv, the one that allows you to turn the tv on standby.

No, this is not normal. It never happened to my set at least.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: mickey_s_1120 on Jan 05, 2010 at 11:31 AM
Sounds a bit fly-by-night, if possible try to access the service menu to check the TV's hours of usage too.

Sir,

What are the steps to check the TV's hour usage in the service menu?  Thanks!  ???  ;D  
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: DonMiguel85 on Jan 05, 2010 at 12:21 PM
Sir,

What are the steps to check the TV's hour usage in the service menu?  Thanks!  ???  ;D  
Depende sa TV model kasi. You have to press a secret sequence of buttons on the remote. I was able to access my Samsung TV's menu, but can't find any info on the C10 series on Google.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ferdinand on Jan 05, 2010 at 01:33 PM
Bakit sir? Pirated din ba to ;D ;D?
Yun add nila sabi main office nila sa shaw. They also have 1yr warranty.
Gray units kaya to?

Try to read their add sa Inquirer. Need your opinion on this din. Ty!
Puedeng ganyan na kamura balik sa dating presyo na 39k yung 42c10.
Sana totoo, Saan kaya yan, di ko pa napuntahan yan.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: booker1 on Jan 06, 2010 at 05:37 PM
meron po ba gumagamit ng sky digibox with 50c10 dito? pwede ba malaman kung ano yung settings nyo?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: sabr on Jan 06, 2010 at 08:44 PM
I'm sure sawa na kayo sa screen burn questions. My apologies.

Saw this on the net: http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.com/plasma-vs-lcd-2.html

"...Recent improvements in plasma display technology have certainly extended the time it takes to burn-in a plasma pixel. The use of improved phosphor material, and motion adaptive/pixel orbiting preventive burn-in technology has greatly reduced the risk of burn-in...."

My question: does the C10 have this pixel orbiting technology na rin? Planning to get one for the bedroom and Im sure babad sa disney channel yung TV, unlike my pv80 which i only use for movies in another room. Hope someone can confirm this. Thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Stagea on Jan 07, 2010 at 03:01 PM
meron po ba gumagamit ng sky digibox with 50c10 dito? pwede ba malaman kung ano yung settings nyo?

Box setting ba tanong mo?

I use Sky's Coship HD Digibox with an HDMI connection. I just use the 1080i resolution, which is the native res of Sky's HD feed (History / Discovery / HBO / Balls). It looks best this way.

For audio, I just set it to AC-3, as this is also the native format of the feed. I just allow my receiver to decode it as-is, instead of passing a PCM signal.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: booker1 on Jan 07, 2010 at 07:43 PM
Box setting ba tanong mo?

I use Sky's Coship HD Digibox with an HDMI connection. I just use the 1080i resolution, which is the native res of Sky's HD feed (History / Discovery / HBO / Balls). It looks best this way.

For audio, I just set it to AC-3, as this is also the native format of the feed. I just allow my receiver to decode it as-is, instead of passing a PCM signal.



thanks sir, kaya lang hindi hd yung digibox ko. and yung optimal settings sana ng tv.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Jan 08, 2010 at 10:52 PM
i was able to experience the orbit feature with my previous LG 32" plasma.
the movement was quite obvious (if youre waiting for it to move), but prolly because it was a 480p tv and the pixels were a bit bigger  :)
kewl feature if you ask me, but i dont think panasonic has this feature (as if panasonic did not deem this necessary)   ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jan 09, 2010 at 07:03 PM
parang gusto ko mag 50c10 at palitan yung 42 c10 ko =(
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: DonMiguel85 on Jan 09, 2010 at 08:05 PM
parang gusto ko mag 50c10 at palitan yung 42 c10 ko =(
Better to also get a 1080p-capable set rather than just a mere 8 inch size increase.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jan 10, 2010 at 03:03 PM
Better to also get a 1080p-capable set rather than just a mere 8 inch size increase.

I'll keep that in mind sir :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: chris_santo on Jan 10, 2010 at 03:58 PM
May nakabili na ba ng c10 sa listening in style? 40k flat kasi tawad ko dun.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: stan1196 on Jan 10, 2010 at 05:06 PM
parang gusto ko mag 50c10 at palitan yung 42 c10 ko =(

hi tonteng, bakit gusto mo palitan ng 50" Plasma yung 42c10 mo?  Bitin ba ang 42" Plasma? I'm planning to get a pana 42x10 or 42c10.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: minisushi on Jan 11, 2010 at 09:35 AM
pa review naman ng 42c10 based sa actual use mo sir tonteng!! thanks
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Tonteng on Jan 11, 2010 at 12:17 PM
@minisushi: Sir I'm sorry I not really good at  review...dati gamit ko 42pv8...tapos nagpalit ako sa ng 42c10...wala naman problema, PS3 games, Playing 720p files...okay lahat


@stan: sana nga ...konting dagdag na lang 50 na sana...pero okay lang...I'm still enjoying my unit pa naman
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: threadlock on Jan 11, 2010 at 12:21 PM
I have auditioned the 42C10 and picture quality is impressive for its price if not very particular with black levels or screen reflectivity issue.
I just noticed that at viewing distance of 7 feet, the pixel structures is still a bit prominent to my eyes. This is not the case with 1080 plasma 42S10.
Does anyone also have same observation?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Stagea on Jan 11, 2010 at 01:26 PM
I have auditioned the 42C10 and picture quality is impressive for its price if not very particular with black levels or screen reflectivity issue.
I just noticed that at viewing distance of 7 feet, the pixel structures is still a bit prominent to my eyes. This is not the case with 1080 plasma 42S10.
Does anyone also have same observation?

You can notice it if you look for it (especially with the 50C10), but if you sit a little further back or don't look for the flaws, these sets can provide an excellent viewing experience.

The flicker in these screens is also a bit harder to spot (I see it, but I don't get bothered by it) versus Hitachi plasmas that I've seen (these make me teary).
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: mickey_s_1120 on Jan 11, 2010 at 02:02 PM
Please note that
     42" c10 plasma has           1024 x  768 pixels        while the
     42" s10 plasma has           1920 x 1024 pixels.  

Since more pixels are compressed in the 42" s10 unit, it means the pixels for the s10 are smaller compared to that from the c10.   It's more of the horizontal pixels which are very obvious.  The Full HD s10 has twice as many horizontal pixels.  The pixels are visible at 4 to 5 feet viewing distance.  

I don't remember where I read before that the optimal flatscreen tv is screen size x 1.5.  

For a

TV size (diagonal)                    viewing distance(minimum)
42"                                           42 x 1.5 or 63" (approxiate 5 feet)
50"                                           50 x 1.5 or 75" (approximate 6 feet)
60"                                           60 x 1.5 or 90" (approximate 7 feet)

Get the biggest size that your budget permit, for your viewing pleasure will be enhanced greatly.  Am enjoying the 42c10 plasma.  Although sometimes I wished I have more money so I can get the 50" plasma.  Have a good and Godly day.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: sweetsound on Jan 11, 2010 at 09:21 PM
Just came to know about this issue. Can you inquire your mom if the staff is a woman or a man. This staff will be reprimanded once I get to identify him.

Thank you for giving us the feedback. Will definitely put my hand on this rude personnel.
 I second the motion, last time na pumunta ako bibili sana ako sa Sight and sound ng 42s10 , para sa bahay namin sa Mla. pero masungit talaga yung babaeing nasa kahera.  kaya bumili nalang ako sa List in style kahit mas mahal ng 1T pesos.  Now balak ko naman bumili ng 50s10 para sa bahay namin sa province.  pag nandun naman yung masungit na babae ewan ko lang.  calling the attention of manager Vic.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: trigo on Jan 11, 2010 at 09:37 PM
Please note that
     42" c10 plasma has           1024 x  768 pixels        while the
     42" s10 plasma has           1920 x 1024 pixels.  

Since more pixels are compressed in the 42" s10 unit, it means the pixels for the s10 are smaller compared to that from the c10.   It's more of the horizontal pixels which are very obvious.  The Full HD s10 has twice as many horizontal pixels.  The pixels are visible at 4 to 5 feet viewing distance.  

I don't remember where I read before that the optimal flatscreen tv is screen size x 1.5.  

For a

TV size (diagonal)                    viewing distance(minimum)
42"                                           42 x 1.5 or 63" (approxiate 5 feet)
50"                                           50 x 1.5 or 75" (approximate 6 feet)
60"                                           60 x 1.5 or 90" (approximate 7 feet)

Get the biggest size that your budget permit, for your viewing pleasure will be enhanced greatly.  Am enjoying the 42c10 plasma.  Although sometimes I wished I have more money so I can get the 50" plasma.  Have a good and Godly day.


i think it is x2.5 to x3.0 of the screen size is the optimal viewing distance.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: number1 on Jan 11, 2010 at 10:34 PM
mickey_s_1120 is right if you were to follow this guide (http://www.cnet.com/hdtv-viewing-distance/)



i think it is x2.5 to x3.0 of the screen size is the optimal viewing distance.

Please note that
     42" c10 plasma has           1024 x  768 pixels        while the
     42" s10 plasma has           1920 x 1024 pixels. 

Since more pixels are compressed in the 42" s10 unit, it means the pixels for the s10 are smaller compared to that from the c10.   It's more of the horizontal pixels which are very obvious.  The Full HD s10 has twice as many horizontal pixels.  The pixels are visible at 4 to 5 feet viewing distance. 

I don't remember where I read before that the optimal flatscreen tv is screen size x 1.5. 

For a

TV size (diagonal)                    viewing distance(minimum)
42"                                           42 x 1.5 or 63" (approxiate 5 feet)
50"                                           50 x 1.5 or 75" (approximate 6 feet)
60"                                           60 x 1.5 or 90" (approximate 7 feet)

Get the biggest size that your budget permit, for your viewing pleasure will be enhanced greatly.  Am enjoying the 42c10 plasma.  Although sometimes I wished I have more money so I can get the 50" plasma.  Have a good and Godly day.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Lotur on Jan 12, 2010 at 06:21 PM
finally completed my 150-hr break in period ;D
after applying the tweaks from pre tailhook and my own preferences, here's my favorite 50c10 calibration setting:

DYNAMIC
contrast  70
brightness -1
color +48
sharpness +54
tint +2
color balance Cool
color management Off
xV color Off

i loved the cool setting, for some reason, found sharpness bumped up by the bluish shade and made the pq less soft. set the overlay scan to "off" as well
you can try it out peeps and see if it suits you :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: minisushi on Jan 14, 2010 at 09:28 AM
still in the doldrum of deciding wc unit to get arghh! so this is what i did, with 2 friends of mine, and armed with a standar dvd of 2012 we headed for an audition. the sets were placed side by side by side! these are the 42c10, 42s10 and the 50c10. all three of them were plugged in with an hdmi, playing a pirated dvd from a standard dvd player. here are my impressions. the 42c10 displayed horrendous colors, exhbited pixel lag and was lacking in image details, the area around the eyes of the characters tend to darken a bit, i can say a bit pixelated din yung image. the 42s10 showed more natural skin tones, better color overall, and most importantly smoother images, hndi pixelated (if that's the right term), finally the 50c10. i should say, this set is just superb.
great colors, skin tones were realistic, and surprisingly did not show pixeled images. i was even assuming a worse output since the 42c10 was a dissapointment, wat more sa 50 inch right? but me my friends agreed the 50c10 was nowhere near the 42c10's output. wc prompted me to ask, y? dont they have the same innards?? gurus, pls explain... tia!!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: RastaSega on Jan 14, 2010 at 10:03 AM
disclaimer. I'm not an expert.

first of all your choice of media. I'm assuming by "standar dvd of 2012" you mean it's a pirated version of 2012. I just guessed because currently 2012 in Amazon.com is still not released. So that in itself will tell you that there's a big possibility that you're not getting a dvd quality picture.

next. check the specs of the 40c10 and the 50c10. You'll see that everything is the same except for the screen size.

This leads me to believe that magkaiba lang yung settings nung dalawang tv na tiningnan mo. Also possible is magkaiba yung viewing angle mo.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: minisushi on Jan 14, 2010 at 10:32 AM
yes that' what puzzled me, it shouldve beeen the same. regarding the viewing angle, we were standing approximately 8ft away making sure we were perpendicular to the screen of the unit we were auditioning. actually this was observed by some other friends of mine when they visited ansons (i thnk) we just wanted to knw if we had the same impression. bt i was really dead set on getting the 42c10, until yesterday.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: frequenzy on Jan 14, 2010 at 10:38 AM
also not an expert pero malamang magkaiba settings ng 42C10 and 50C10 kaya ganun. or may sira yung 42C10 :-) more or less they should have same output except na mas malaki yung 50C10.

i've also auditioned 50C10, 42C10, 42S10, samsung 5series using I Robot BD. ang nabili ko is yung 42C10 because of the budget. pero kung may extra pa I would have purchased the 50inch.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: d'dale on Jan 14, 2010 at 11:16 AM
mga sir...

ano po ba ang maganddang setting pag naka cable ka sa 42s10?

thanks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: threadlock on Jan 14, 2010 at 04:18 PM
yes that' what puzzled me, it shouldve beeen the same. regarding the viewing angle, we were standing approximately 8ft away making sure we were perpendicular to the screen of the unit we were auditioning. actually this was observed by some other friends of mine when they visited ansons (i thnk) we just wanted to knw if we had the same impression. bt i was really dead set on getting the 42c10, until yesterday.
Could it be because of the native resolution of the panels?
While 50inch is larger by 8" diagonally, it also has a better resolution of 1366 x 768 or 1MP versus the 42" resolution of 1024 x 768 or 786,432pixels. So in effect the 50C10 has finer details?
When I auditioned the 42C10 and 50C10, I also had the same observation in that when playing the same material, the 50C10 shows better pixelation than 42C10 at 7feet viewing distance. The difference is not by miles though.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jan 14, 2010 at 05:53 PM
first of all your choice of media. I'm assuming by "standar dvd of 2012" you mean it's a pirated version of 2012. I just guessed because currently 2012 in Amazon.com is still not released.

I noticed that too.  And that also led me to check amazon  ;).

But if a pirate version of 2012 was used on the 42C10, the comparison is still fair because the 50C10 was also playing the same pirate version.
 

Could it be because of the native resolution of the panels?
While 50inch is larger by 8" diagonally, it also has a better resolution of 1366 x 768 or 1MP versus the 42" resolution of 1024 x 768 or 786,432pixels. So in effect the 50C10 has finer details?

I'm thinking that a slight difference could be caused by the native pixel ratio.  

1024 x 768 pixels is a 4:3 ratio, called "XGA" (Extended Graphics Array), originally designed for 4:3 computer monitors.

1366 x 768 pixels is a true 16:9 ratio, called "WXGA" (Wide XGA), a non-standard resolution originally designed for widescreen LCD monitors and TVs.

The 42C10 native resolution ratio is 4:3, but it uses rectangular pixels to make a 16:9 screen.  The 50C10 uses a 16:9 native pixel resolution ratio on a matching 16:9 screen.

My theory is that it's likely that a 1366 x 768 TV will outperform a 1024 x 768 TV because it would be easier to design a good internal scaler for square pixels than for rectangular pixels.

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: minisushi on Jan 14, 2010 at 06:09 PM
@barister- i think you nailed it bro!!! thank you for your analyses.
@raSTAsEGA- thank you for pointing that out!
50c10 here i come!!!!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: sweetsound on Jan 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Sir, input naman which is better, 50c10 or 50s10?  still choosing between the 2 models.  thanks :-\ :-\
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jan 26, 2010 at 12:48 PM


Sabi ni sir Carlo mas maganda pa raw ang C10.  Eto yung comment niya:


Blu-Ray:

Using a PS3 set at 1080p for both the S10 and the C10 gave mixed results:

-With a new movie like "The Dark Knight", both the S10 and the C10 gave very good picture quality. The S10 with it's 1080 moving resolution bested the C10 in the area of motion flow.

-Popping an old and somewhat poor transfer like "Bram Stockers: Dracula", delivered varied results for me. The S10 came off flat, soft and somewhat dull. The C10's inherently "glossy" pic (thanks to the reflective screen), gave a more "high-def" look with colors that seem to be more alive.

So far, the S10 remains the "weaker" of the Panny 2009 offerings in my possession...My brain can't accept what my eyes are telling me, so I may do another round"

Presently with the 2009 models I have (G11,C10,S10) the S10, for me, was the "weakest" of the bunch, despite the bannered 1080p flash!

The G series on the other hand is a clear winner:
http://www.pinoydvd.com/index.php?topic=98930.120
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ferdinand on Jan 26, 2010 at 04:48 PM
39 k na lang sa AVX center yung Panasonic 42 c10 with free hdmi. katatanong ko pa lang now. ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jan 26, 2010 at 05:12 PM

Sabi ni sir Carlo mas maganda pa raw ang C10.  Eto yung comment niya:



Yes, everytime I look at them both, mas maganda talaga ang C10^^^

Anyway, mga tsip, my C10 seems to be switching off at random intervals! I got a new power cord along with a new AVR and yet it still happens.

Any ideas?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: blued888 on Jan 26, 2010 at 05:21 PM
Yes, everytime I look at them both, mas maganda talaga ang C10^^^

Anyway, mga tsip, my C10 seems to be switching off at random intervals! I got a new power cord along with a new AVR and yet it still happens.

Any ideas?

Claim warranty via seller/dealer. ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jan 26, 2010 at 05:23 PM
Claim warranty via seller/dealer. ;D

I guess, habang naka warranty pa :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Jan 26, 2010 at 05:41 PM
Anyway, mga tsip, my C10 seems to be switching off at random intervals! I got a new power cord along with a new AVR and yet it still happens.

Any ideas?

Is that a 50C10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Gwenael on Jan 26, 2010 at 05:58 PM
Sir Carlo777, I had a similar issue with my old panny 42pv70h. Switching off at random, intervals, sometimes it will flicker for few seconds then blank/black screen, after few seconds it will power on again. At first, i though it's just a lose connection so I checked all connections but the problem becomes worst overtime and becomes irritating.

To make the story short, pina home service ko na unit ko. First, they diagnosed the panel using their instrument and was very happy to know that it's working perfectly (panel problem/replacement will cost you as much as a new unit). Then, they check all the connections / contacts and removed them and cleaned up then connect again. And alas...okey na ulit plasma ko hanggang ngayon di na bumalik problema. Sabi nung technician, sobrang madumi lang daw iyong contacts kya ganun. Damage...2.5k

hth

Yes, everytime I look at them both, mas maganda talaga ang C10^^^

Anyway, mga tsip, my C10 seems to be switching off at random intervals! I got a new power cord along with a new AVR and yet it still happens.

Any ideas?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jan 26, 2010 at 07:21 PM
 I second the motion, last time na pumunta ako bibili sana ako sa Sight and sound ng 42s10 , para sa bahay namin sa Mla. pero masungit talaga yung babaeing nasa kahera.  kaya bumili nalang ako sa List in style kahit mas mahal ng 1T pesos.  Now balak ko naman bumili ng 50s10 para sa bahay namin sa province.  pag nandun naman yung masungit na babae ewan ko lang.  calling the attention of manager Vic.

Text me directly at 0917-5413491. I will be the one to attend your need. The 50s10 is now available at cash P90K.  :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: minisushi on Jan 27, 2010 at 09:39 AM
wow 50s1 meron na.... hmmm hw much na kaya discount sa 50c10??
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Jan 27, 2010 at 12:11 PM
When I was at Sights and Sounds they still have the Legendary 50PV80 (one of the best plasma units to come out). Check it out kung meron pa...

For those who are bothered by the reflective screen of the C10 this is a very good bet.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Jan 27, 2010 at 12:24 PM
When I was at Sights and Sounds they still have the Legendary 50PV80 (one of the best plasma units to come out). Check it out kung meron pa...

For those who are bothered by the reflective screen of the C10 this is a very good bet.

Exactly why I bought my 42PV80 even if I still didn't need it.  Great TV talaga.  Downside lang with the PV80 as against the C10, is that the PV80 requires slightly more electricity.

BTW, anybody know when the C10 initially came out in the Philippines?  I'm wondering when the new series will come out and if the C10 prices will go down.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: E-reply on Jan 27, 2010 at 05:24 PM
Exactly why I bought my 42PV80 even if I still didn't need it.  Great TV talaga.  Downside lang with the PV80 as against the C10, is that the PV80 requires slightly more electricity.

BTW, anybody know when the C10 initially came out in the Philippines?  I'm wondering when the new series will come out and if the C10 prices will go down.

C10 was out in Asia region last year month of June.  :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: number1 on Jan 30, 2010 at 10:40 PM
At SM appliances, there was a L32S10 and 42C10 playing the same video loop. Without even bothering with the settings, I really liked the LCD better. LCD looks warmer with the color popping. Plasma looked subdued compared to the LCD, almost as if there was a very fine meshed screen infront of it-preventing it from looking as vibrant as the LCD. 

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: richardcruz on Feb 02, 2010 at 09:19 AM
I have the Panny P42C10 and for me, I find it better than my other Samsung LCD TV - the picture quality is more "cinematic". The colors in this plasma are not too bright nor saturated such that it's more realistic (especially in showing black levels and grey shades). Of course, in a brightly-lit showroom, the brighter LCD will look "better" (because the colors will be stronger and brighter) than plasma. But try watching for longer periods of time and the plasma will appear better, non-fatiguing visually (the equivalent of non-fatiguing sound that one can compliment better audio systems).

On both DVD and BD (via PS3), the Panny plasma gives off a better color balance and better overall picture quality. And especially on regular TV viewing via cable, the Panny plasma has a better viewing experience, as it shows less or none of the signal distortions/noise such as horizontal "line buzz" that are more obvious on the LCD (we have Sky Cable, and the signal is already quite good, watching cinema channels on plasma like HBO, Star Movies and Cinemax look like watching DVD!).
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: avshop on Feb 02, 2010 at 09:31 AM
At SM appliances, there was a L32S10 and 42C10 playing the same video loop. Without even bothering with the settings, I really liked the LCD better. LCD looks warmer with the color popping. Plasma looked subdued compared to the LCD, almost as if there was a very fine meshed screen infront of it-preventing it from looking as vibrant as the LCD.  



check the connections. sometimes the big appliance stores only put the hdmi connections with the unit they want sell so it will look better. i went to abensons once and they had the 42s10 and 42c10 side by side. the 42s10 looked so much better at first glance. but then i double checked the connections and saw that the 42c10 was only connected via component cable. when i asked them to connect both via hdmi the pictures were almost identical na. :)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Hot Mama on Feb 02, 2010 at 05:37 PM
I noticed that too.  And that also led me to check amazon  ;).

But if a pirate version of 2012 was used on the 42C10, the comparison is still fair because the 50C10 was also playing the same pirate version.
 

I'm thinking that a slight difference could be caused by the native pixel ratio.  

1024 x 768 pixels is a 4:3 ratio, called "XGA" (Extended Graphics Array), originally designed for 4:3 computer monitors.

1366 x 768 pixels is a true 16:9 ratio, called "WXGA" (Wide XGA), a non-standard resolution originally designed for widescreen LCD monitors and TVs.

The 42C10 native resolution ratio is 4:3, but it uses rectangular pixels to make a 16:9 screen.  The 50C10 uses a 16:9 native pixel resolution ratio on a matching 16:9 screen.

My theory is that it's likely that a 1366 x 768 TV will outperform a 1024 x 768 TV because it would be easier to design a good internal scaler for square pixels than for rectangular pixels.



So i guess that's why i cant get a good widescreen resolution when connecting my laptop via VGA. For a widescreen TV, it could not display a widescreen resolution... mostly 4:3 lang.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: number1 on Feb 02, 2010 at 11:05 PM

so how is your 42C10's performance when it comes to viewing cable tv?

I have the Panny P42C10 and for me, I find it better than my other Samsung LCD TV - the picture quality is more "cinematic". The colors in this plasma are not too bright nor saturated such that it's more realistic (especially in showing black levels and grey shades). Of course, in a brightly-lit showroom, the brighter LCD will look "better" (because the colors will be stronger and brighter) than plasma. But try watching for longer periods of time and the plasma will appear better, non-fatiguing visually (the equivalent of non-fatiguing sound that one can compliment better audio systems).

On both DVD and BD (via PS3), the Panny plasma gives off a better color balance and better overall picture quality. And especially on regular TV viewing via cable, the Panny plasma has a better viewing experience, as it shows less or none of the signal distortions/noise such as horizontal "line buzz" that are more obvious on the LCD (we have Sky Cable, and the signal is already quite good, watching cinema channels on plasma like HBO, Star Movies and Cinemax look like watching DVD!).
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: richardcruz on Feb 03, 2010 at 02:49 PM
It's there already on my orig post :) PQ is really smooth and crisp on the 42C10!

especially on regular TV viewing via cable, the Panny plasma has a better viewing experience, as it shows less or none of the signal distortions/noise such as horizontal "line buzz" that are more obvious on the LCD (we have Sky Cable, and the signal is already quite good, watching cinema channels on plasma like HBO, Star Movies and Cinemax look like watching DVD!).
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ZOoom on Feb 03, 2010 at 11:10 PM
hello po..im currently eyeing etong plasma na to..i need some advice lang po. ill be using the TV inside my room lang naman po for HD viewing(mostly 720p) and PS3 gaming..ang distance ko po kasi sa screen would be about 12ft kaya ill stick with the 720p native reso muna, since they say Full HD is for around 6ft viewing distance..ang tanong ko lang po, ano po kaya sa tingin niyo ang maganda given my viewing distance..42c10/50c10? or do you guys think i should go Full HD for the 42s10? hindi na kasi kaya ng budget yung 50s10 e..your comments will be greatly appreciated

Btw, OKay po ba 720p viewing sa 50c10? TYIA
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: minisushi on Feb 04, 2010 at 06:15 PM
bro, as per my research upon reading tons of reviews and other threads as well as actual viewing, i would recommend the 50c10. Especially considering your viewing distance of 12 ft. At first kc i was also concerned with the 720 "only" res of the 50c10 but you're right, not noticeable yun difference sa 1080p unless you move in 6ft or closer. Most of the people i know who upgraded their display unit usually end up saying "sayang sana yun mas malaki na lang kinuha ko" :D so yes, in this case size wins. plus, the 50c10 delivers astoundingly natural color that's soothing to the eyes, the very reason why people here prefer plasma over lcd, one look at the 50c10 and you'll know why.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Feb 05, 2010 at 12:22 PM


... ang distance ko po kasi sa screen would be about 12ft ...
... ang tanong ko lang po, ano po kaya sa tingin niyo ang maganda given my viewing distance..42c10/50c10?

50C10.




... or do you guys think i should go Full HD for the 42s10? hindi na kasi kaya ng budget yung 50s10 e..your comments will be greatly appreciated

At your 12-foot distance, 1080p and 720p (768p) will look practically the same on a 42-inch TV.

Cnet's David Carnoy says:

We still believe that when you're dealing with TVs 50 inches and smaller, the added resolution has only a very minor impact on picture quality. In our tests, we put 720p (or 768p) sets next to 1080p sets, then feed them both the same source material, whether it's 1080i or 1080p, from the highest-quality Blu-ray player. We typically watch both sets for a while, with eyes darting back and forth between the two, looking for differences in the most-detailed sections, such as hair, textures of fabric, and grassy plains. Bottom line: It's almost always very difficult to see any difference--especially from farther than 8 feet away on a 50-inch TV.

http://reviews.cnet.com/720p-vs-1080p-hdtv/




Btw, OKay po ba 720p viewing sa 50c10? TYIA

OK na OK sa akin --- 50C10 at a 10-foot distance (Standard DVD only).


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: antikryst on Feb 08, 2010 at 10:41 AM
At SM appliances, there was a L32S10 and 42C10 playing the same video loop. Without even bothering with the settings, I really liked the LCD better. LCD looks warmer with the color popping. Plasma looked subdued compared to the LCD, almost as if there was a very fine meshed screen infront of it-preventing it from looking as vibrant as the LCD.  



probably because of the lighting in the store. i got the 42c10 to replace my 32R81 samsung lcd... it was a big upgrade in terms of size. this is probably because i calibrated my samsung to look "cinema like" with my room lighting... which in the end subdued the colors of the lcd in a way.

i guess what im saying is that it wouldnt be an issue once you bring the plasma home. :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: antikryst on Feb 08, 2010 at 10:44 AM
bro, as per my research upon reading tons of reviews and other threads as well as actual viewing, i would recommend the 50c10. Especially considering your viewing distance of 12 ft. At first kc i was also concerned with the 720 "only" res of the 50c10 but you're right, not noticeable yun difference sa 1080p unless you move in 6ft or closer. Most of the people i know who upgraded their display unit usually end up saying "sayang sana yun mas malaki na lang kinuha ko" :D so yes, in this case size wins. plus, the 50c10 delivers astoundingly natural color that's soothing to the eyes, the very reason why people here prefer plasma over lcd, one look at the 50c10 and you'll know why.

i was actually surprised with the 50c10 when i saw it while i was shopping for a tv at SnS. (got the 42c10..which replaced a 32" samsung lcd)... good thing the 50c10 wouldnt fit in my room. 42" was as big as i could go so i was able to restrain myself.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: edrel sison on Feb 09, 2010 at 08:51 AM
how much would be the current price of the 50C10 now? has there been some significant price drop?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: dyango on Feb 09, 2010 at 10:30 AM


Went to harrison plaza 2 weeks ago the price of panasonic 50c10 is 65k cash.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: t43m4n on Feb 09, 2010 at 03:19 PM
Has anyone compared the 42c10 vs LG 42PQ10?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ZOoom on Feb 09, 2010 at 09:15 PM
thanks sir Minisushi and sir barrister..50c10 then..thanks a lot
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: vx2 on Feb 09, 2010 at 10:22 PM
So anybody know the cheapest 42C10 price now? :D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: beetee on Feb 12, 2010 at 01:09 PM
Quote
So anybody know the cheapest 42C10 price now?

up for this. i also need to know

thanks
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: abcerase on Feb 17, 2010 at 11:03 PM
just want to ask this to the owners...

how much "damage" did the 42c10 (@ 280watts)/ 50c10 (@385 watts) do to your electric bills? were there any significant increase? i went to MAC by Meralco but I found it a bit vague...

thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: fitdynamite on Feb 18, 2010 at 02:00 PM
just want to ask this to the owners...

how much "damage" did the 42c10 (@ 280watts)/ 50c10 (@385 watts) do to your electric bills? were there any significant increase? i went to MAC by Meralco but I found it a bit vague...

thanks!

i just got my 50c10 dis week. im sure cheaper than pv80 hehe but il let you knw after a month.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: fitdynamite on Feb 18, 2010 at 02:08 PM
bro, as per my research upon reading tons of reviews and other threads as well as actual viewing, i would recommend the 50c10. Especially considering your viewing distance of 12 ft. At first kc i was also concerned with the 720 "only" res of the 50c10 but you're right, not noticeable yun difference sa 1080p unless you move in 6ft or closer. Most of the people i know who upgraded their display unit usually end up saying "sayang sana yun mas malaki na lang kinuha ko" :D so yes, in this case size wins. plus, the 50c10 delivers astoundingly natural color that's soothing to the eyes, the very reason why people here prefer plasma over lcd, one look at the 50c10 and you'll know why.
+1 very gentle on eyes compare to LCD.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: antikryst on Feb 21, 2010 at 01:19 AM
based on the calibration done at SnS, here is the recommended setting:

NORMAL
contrast  68
brightness +1
color +45
sharpness +51
tint +1
color balance Warm
color management Off
xV color Off


just had mine calibrated earlier by the guy from SnS... had different settings. just sharing.

NORMAL
contrast  59
brightness +3
color +44
sharpness +50
tint 0
color balance Warm
color management Off
xV color Off
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: beetee on Feb 21, 2010 at 11:28 AM
just got my 42c10 @ 39,888 w/ free hdmi and 1 year warranty

so far so good
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: deuce on Feb 21, 2010 at 11:45 AM
just got my 42c10 @ 39,888 w/ free hdmi and 1 year warranty

so far so good

Nice! Saang store ito? Panasonic Philippines ba ang warranty? Thanks for the info!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: beetee on Feb 21, 2010 at 04:06 PM
Quote
Nice! Saang store ito? Panasonic Philippines ba ang warranty? Thanks for the info!

flatpaneltvsforless sa metrowalk ortigas (sa mga tindahan ng dvd)

1 year warranty sa service center nila (former panasonic techs ang gagawa)

Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: fitdynamite on Feb 24, 2010 at 02:16 PM
just had mine calibrated earlier by the guy from SnS... had different settings. just sharing.

NORMAL
contrast  59
brightness +3
color +44
sharpness +50
tint 0
color balance Warm
color management Off
xV color Off

eto setting ni Carlo777 ginaya ko ok namn lalo malamig sa mata.

During the "Break-in" period I use these settings;

Mode: Cinema

Contrast: 48
Brightness: -1
Color: 50
Sharpness: 49
Temp:  Normal
Tint: 0
C.Management: Off


sir carlo gano katagal break in setting?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Feb 24, 2010 at 06:42 PM
eto setting ni Carlo777 ginaya ko ok namn lalo malamig sa mata.

During the "Break-in" period I use these settings;

Mode: Cinema

Contrast: 48
Brightness: -1
Color: 50
Sharpness: 49
Temp:  Normal
Tint: 0
C.Management: Off


sir carlo gano katagal break in setting?

100 hours lang tsip=)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: retro12195 on Feb 24, 2010 at 06:51 PM
100 hours lang tsip=)
after 100 hours,ano po magandang settings?TIA rod
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: fitdynamite on Feb 24, 2010 at 08:28 PM
after 100 hours,ano po magandang settings?TIA rod
Tnx sir carlo! same question with retro sir?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: beetee on Feb 25, 2010 at 12:40 PM
sirs tulong naman

may settings ba kayo ng audio?

ung sakin kasi pag movies, ang hina ng speech volume pero normal ung background sound (music, sound effects etc) pero pag speech mahina. pag nilakasan ko naman ung volume for the speech to be audible, napalakas naman ng background so ang nangyayari manual mode ako ngayon, lagi ko hawak remote  >:(
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Feb 25, 2010 at 01:39 PM
Tnx sir carlo! same question with retro sir?
after 100 hours,ano po magandang settings?TIA rod

Sure mga tsip, but alam ko very very low contrast yun bec my wife watches in a pitch black enviroment. I'll have her post it later.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: plips on Feb 25, 2010 at 05:20 PM
sirs tulong naman

may settings ba kayo ng audio?

ung sakin kasi pag movies, ang hina ng speech volume pero normal ung background sound (music, sound effects etc) pero pag speech mahina. pag nilakasan ko naman ung volume for the speech to be audible, napalakas naman ng background so ang nangyayari manual mode ako ngayon, lagi ko hawak remote  Angry...

sir are you using a separate home theater or sa tv lang galing yung sound?

if your using separate HT adjust the volume level of each speaker... try to set the center to max... and adjust also the distance of the speaker relative to your wire used...
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: fitdynamite on Feb 26, 2010 at 05:11 PM
sirs tulong naman

may settings ba kayo ng audio?

ung sakin kasi pag movies, ang hina ng speech volume pero normal ung background sound (music, sound effects etc) pero pag speech mahina. pag nilakasan ko naman ung volume for the speech to be audible, napalakas naman ng background so ang nangyayari manual mode ako ngayon, lagi ko hawak remote  >:(
same sakin before. are you using 5.1 or speaker ng tv lng? sa home theater 5.1 auto setup na check ko negative ang center at positive surround. ganon yata pag your watching 5.1 kasi sa movie house d ba malakas tlga ang surround at tama lng ang center. d lng tau sanay sa house na ganon din kalakas. try watching sa rockwell and compare mo sa room mo naka 5.1 same vol. hehe ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ferdinand on Feb 26, 2010 at 06:54 PM
So anybody know the cheapest 42C10 price now? :D
Kay sir jeff yung pana 42 c10 nya 38k lang, by order daw.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: albert_b on Mar 05, 2010 at 05:23 PM
Kay sir jeff yung pana 42 c10 nya 38k lang, by order daw.

Wow! Talaga?! ... Paging Jeff ... I'm interested :-)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Mar 07, 2010 at 01:02 AM
My settings under normal lighting conditions:

Picture mode: Cinema

Contrast: 60
Brightness: -1
Color: 40
Sharpness: 55
Tint: -3
Temp: Warm

All enhancements off
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: mattia on Apr 13, 2010 at 02:38 PM
same sakin before. are you using 5.1 or speaker ng tv lng? sa home theater 5.1 auto setup na check ko negative ang center at positive surround. ganon yata pag your watching 5.1 kasi sa movie house d ba malakas tlga ang surround at tama lng ang center. d lng tau sanay sa house na ganon din kalakas. try watching sa rockwell and compare mo sa room mo naka 5.1 same vol. hehe ;D


In preparation for the arrival of my BD player, please enlighten on the audio connections.  First, I connect the HDMI cable to the panny plasma.  This includes audio right?  Then I connect the audio cable to my yamaha for the 5.1 speakers.  When I play movies, do i mute the plasma or automatic sya na mag off once the audio cable is activated?  or does it play together with the HT for better sound?  please advise gurus.  Thanks.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: dips15 on Apr 16, 2010 at 11:16 PM
In preparation for the arrival of my BD player, please enlighten on the audio connections.  First, I connect the HDMI cable to the panny plasma.  This includes audio right?  Then I connect the audio cable to my yamaha for the 5.1 speakers.  When I play movies, do i mute the plasma or automatic sya na mag off once the audio cable is activated?  or does it play together with the HT for better sound?  please advise gurus.  Thanks.

Yamaha AVR ito or HTIB?  If its a yamaha AVR and can decode audio via hdmi, just connect your HDMI from the BD player to your AVR and connect another HDMI cable from the yamaha to your Plasma.

On the other hand, if your AVR does not decode audio via HDMI, you can still connect your HDMI cable to your AVR but you have to have another cable (optical or coaxial) connected to your AVR. 

If your AVR does not have HDMI, just connect your HDMI directly to your TV and connect an audio cable (optical or coaxial to your AVR).  In this scenario, you have to change the setting on your BD player to send only video and not audio.  Otherwise, yes you'll have to mute your TV so that you won't have to sound sources.  (TV and separate speakers)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: macks75 on May 07, 2010 at 11:51 AM
how do you go about the 100 hours burn in process ?

meron ba link dyan
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: mattia on Jun 25, 2010 at 05:57 PM
Yamaha AVR ito or HTIB?  If its a yamaha AVR and can decode audio via hdmi, just connect your HDMI from the BD player to your AVR and connect another HDMI cable from the yamaha to your Plasma.

On the other hand, if your AVR does not decode audio via HDMI, you can still connect your HDMI cable to your AVR but you have to have another cable (optical or coaxial) connected to your AVR. 

If your AVR does not have HDMI, just connect your HDMI directly to your TV and connect an audio cable (optical or coaxial to your AVR).  In this scenario, you have to change the setting on your BD player to send only video and not audio.  Otherwise, yes you'll have to mute your TV so that you won't have to sound sources.  (TV and separate speakers)

This is what I'm doing now.  I'm using optical cable.  Until a good deal comes around for a better HT with HDMI. Thanks bro ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: alx on Jul 02, 2010 at 08:43 AM
guys, marami bang gumagamit ng 42c10 for gaming? ano kaya feedback?

thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: kidlat08 on Jul 02, 2010 at 09:19 AM
how do you go about the 100 hours burn in process ?

meron ba link dyan


Same question po? Does it need to be done on brand new tv's may it be plasma, lcd, led?
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: Stagea on Jul 02, 2010 at 09:27 AM
how do you go about the 100 hours burn in process ?

meron ba link dyan


It's in the manual. It just tells you to minimize viewing of material with static images (such as bright channel logos, or using it with a game console/pc), and to always stretch the image to fill the screen (if there are black bars on the screen) during this period.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: burnok123 on Nov 23, 2010 at 04:44 PM
remember my 24 hour whitewash burn in procedure  ;D
yeah bro 30 minutes paused
but after that long pause, i did finish the movie (must be the reason why i dont see it after) ???
panasonic said it's burn proof anyway (naniwala lang ako sa sinabi nila) :D :D

================

sir kailangan ba talagang gawin ito? kasi im buying a grey unit from a seller here...mahirap kasi ipa warranty ang 42" na plasma.(C10 @ 29k).

thanks
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: jonm on Nov 27, 2010 at 04:28 PM
Pwede po pa-share ng settings...movies n cable...TIA!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Nov 28, 2010 at 02:54 AM
================

sir kailangan ba talagang gawin ito? kasi im buying a grey unit from a seller here...mahirap kasi ipa warranty ang 42" na plasma.(C10 @ 29k).

thanks
para sa akin di mo na kailangan gawin, pero sabi nga nila precaution lang.  wala naman mawawala.  besides it's just 100 hours.  kung mainipin ka, 24 hours white wash lang  (faster burning kasi white tapos balance pa sa buong screen) ;)
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: mattia on Nov 30, 2010 at 04:12 PM
para sa akin di mo na kailangan gawin, pero sabi nga nila precaution lang.  wala naman mawawala.  besides it's just 100 hours.  kung mainipin ka, 24 hours white wash lang  (faster burning kasi white tapos balance pa sa buong screen) ;)

in my experience, after several months of watching i have completely forgotten about the "burn marks".  nung una medyo OC ako and true enough, upon close scrutiny you can see some marks, in my case, the BTV logo, the home settings menu of my BD player, etc.  but after a while you simply ignore it.  I don't even notice them anymore.  And my viewing pleasure has been increased kasi nga di ko na pinoproblema ito.  I just sit back and enjoy the movie ;D
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: Carlo777 on Nov 30, 2010 at 04:18 PM
in my experience, after several months of watching i have completely forgotten about the "burn marks".  nung una medyo OC ako and true enough, upon close scrutiny you can see some marks, in my case, the BTV logo, the home settings menu of my BD player, etc.  but after a while you simply ignore it.  I don't even notice them anymore.  And my viewing pleasure has been increased kasi nga di ko na pinoproblema ito.  I just sit back and enjoy the movie ;D

Very good advise!

Just remember folks use and don't abuse your plasma just like any other electronic device ;)


Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: jonm on Nov 30, 2010 at 08:15 PM
para sa akin di mo na kailangan gawin, pero sabi nga nila precaution lang.  wala naman mawawala.  besides it's just 100 hours.  kung mainipin ka, 24 hours white wash lang  (faster burning kasi white tapos balance pa sa buong screen) ;)

How do you do the white wash? Thanks!
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42C10) Impressions
Post by: qualitycontrol on Dec 01, 2010 at 03:26 AM
How do you do the white wash? Thanks!

alam ko kay sir ninjababez galing tong link: http://www.dataproductservices.com/dpt
just download, hook up your tv to the pc/laptop and run the program using solid white at the background, then leave it running.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: babed95 on Dec 01, 2010 at 04:46 AM
basta hindi naman apektado pag nanonood ka eh ok yun pag madami kang nakikita mas hindi mo ma eenjoy yun panonood mo ksi laging mo na lng iisipin yun.
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: ninjababez® on Dec 01, 2010 at 06:42 AM
sirs tulong naman

may settings ba kayo ng audio?

ung sakin kasi pag movies, ang hina ng speech volume pero normal ung background sound (music, sound effects etc) pero pag speech mahina. pag nilakasan ko naman ung volume for the speech to be audible, napalakas naman ng background so ang nangyayari manual mode ako ngayon, lagi ko hawak remote  >:(
you need a receiver that can do dynamic volume.  no workaround bro, sorry  :(
Title: Re: PANASONIC C-Series (42/50C10) Impressions
Post by: barrister on Dec 01, 2010 at 08:40 PM
ung sakin kasi pag movies, ang hina ng speech volume pero normal ung background sound (music, sound effects etc) pero pag speech mahina.

Hindi normal ang volume ng music and effects niyan sir, mahina yan.  Pag mahina ang volume ng dialog, mahina ang volume ng buong sountrack.


pag nilakasan ko naman ung volume for the speech to be audible, napalakas naman ng background so ang nangyayari manual mode ako ngayon, lagi ko hawak remote  >:(

Hindi malakas ang volume ng background, normal volume yan.  Pag tama ang volume ng dialog, tama ang volume ng buong soundtrack.



=================================



To get the correct volume level, use the volume of the dialog as basis.  Once you get the correct dialog volume, the volume of the entire sound mix is correct.

That's why Dolby's "Dialnorm" (dialog normalization) uses dialog volume level as basis for volume normalization.  

In fact, the FCC (US Federal Communications Commission) adopted Dolby's recommendation for digital broadcasting standards by specifying: "The value of the dialnorm parameter in the AC-3 elementary bit stream shall indicate the level of average spoken dialogue within the encoded audio program."

Sobra bang lakas ng effects and music pag tama ang dialog volume?  Hindi malakas yon sir, iyan talaga ang mix ng post-production technicians.  It's just that you're not used to proper volume levels.  

May garalgal ba ang sound pag lumalakas?  Kung ganon, hindi kaya ng sound system ang dynamic range ng soundtrack.  Kailangan ng external receiver and speakers.

Tama si sir ninjababez, receivers have a night mode function that reduces dynamic range.  When the night mode is on, volume of soft sounds are increased, while volume of loud sounds are decreased.