what is difference with regards to the theatrical and director's cut's length anyway? if were talking 10-15 minutes here, no big deal then. it isnt that good imo in the first place.
Actually, the difference in length is only 3 mins.
from DVD Talk review:
Director's Cut vs. Theatrical Cut - There's honestly not that much of a difference between both cuts. McG stated in early interviews that the Director's Cut would be an additional 30 or 40 minutes when compared to what we've seen in theaters, but that doesn't appear to be the case as
there's only 3 minutes of new material here. Most of the additions come in the form of added violence, some awesome boobage, and some minor scene extensions. Although I typically frown on this sort of marketing for a 'Director's Cut', I can't complain this time around because these 3 minutes really do enhance the original product. Certain moments in the film really seemed like they had some obvious cuts when I first saw the film in theaters, but the Director's Cut makes things seem a bit more seamless. The fact that Warner Brothers have included the Theatrical Cut as well is a plus, since we won't have to worry about them making us double dip for it somewhere down the line.
