With due respect…Sirs Tempter and Rascal
This thread is specific to discussions on evolution and creation and therefore would have at least two sides to the discussions. Each side would naturally have advocates and believers and would express his opinion on the topic to his heart’s content. Besides, a 5 year old thread and 42 pages of discussions is not too long for a topic that spans 4 billion years or so…
*edited*
Lately, most of the post are pro-creation…..maybe because the other side is still looking for topics, scientific research if any, news items etc……to support their views.
Gentlemen, wrongly characterizing other people’s motives and manner of posting is uncalled for and characterizing one’s self as very intelligent but posting “ not to show that intelligence” is false modesty and has no place in this discussion…
If you think “all are non-sense” by all means you have every right NOT to post or open or read this thread. But if you want a friendly, open, non-prejudicial, non-judgmental discussion then you are most welcome.
So, kindly tell me sir temper is my analogy of the “painting, painting itself if given time” with regards to evolution incorrect or non-sense? If it is, then how would you characterize or describe evolution using the painting as an analogy?
You said you advocate evolution and ID, how do you define evolution? If you define evolution as “change through time” then I would agree with that concept…