Any feedback on Samsung S90C? Apart from the 1 year warranty, the 55" is still 10k cheaper than the LG C3, which makes it a bit tempting.
Color luminance and brightness is probably better than the C3. Contrast will also be better on the S90c, particularly for urban Blade Runner type scenes. In brightly-lit rooms, the QD-OLED will probably also outperform the OLED competition from Panasonic, LG, or Sony.
Motion for sports and movies is probably slightly better on the C3 but this would likely depend on which firmware versions per tv are competing against each other. PC Gaming will undoubtedly be better with the S90c's 144Hz refresh rate but console gamers will probably prefer LG or Sony because of the next paragraph.
Unfortunately, some of the best content these days use Dolby Vision, which is not available on Samsung (but Dolby Atmos is, oddly enough). It also doesn't support DTS, so your av receiver will have to be Atmos capable to make the most out of the most recent releases.
Another con for me is the clunky TV interface and the lack of apps. The software is also not as good processing lower quality streams, where Sony will probably be superior followed closely by LG.
You already mentioned the less than ideal 1-year warranty already but I'd also add that my aftersales experience with them was not stellar either.
I would personally not get the Samsung but if you don't care about Dolby Vision, don't need DTS, don't mind that there are less apps, and is ambivalent about the 1-year warranty, then the 10k discount might be enough for you to mitigate the risk.
Sent using Tapatalk
