Just curious, what's the potential of the Tannoys you sensed that is more?
Actually, after some hours of listening, the Tannoys are apparently more detailed and the bass is tighter. I was watching my The Corrs: Unplugged DVD (in stereo), and what I immediately noticed was that I was hearing individual instruments, whereas the Wharfedales gave the impression of a blended orchestra. While hearing a blended accoustic set was great with the Wharfedales, the Tannoys were able to bring out the individual instruments.
Also, bass seems surprisingly bigger with the Wharfedale 9.1s, pero parang mas swabe yung bass ng Tannoys. The Wharfedales actually have smaller woofers, but these are Kevlar, vs the paper cones of the Tannoys. Baka kailangan lang ng mas matagal na break-in for the Tannoys.
Actually, if you were auditioning speakers, and you auditioned them in Yamaha's megall showroom, you would not be able to hear what the Tannoys are capable of. The showroom, especially during Sundays, is quite noisy. Plus, the speakers are connected to a HT receiver and are not bi-wired. Thus, medyo manipis yung tunog. Contrast that with Sight and Sounds Shangrila, where I got my NAD amp and Wharfedales. They were set up exactly as I wanted, bi-wired and paired with each other.
In fact, even with the Tannoys on sale, I was reluctant to get them, since in the showroom, they seemed inferior to the Diamond 9.1s. But something inside of me said to try them out anyway, since mababa lang naman yung outlay (after I sold my speakers). The worst thing was I would sell them and get a new pair of Diamond 9.1s.
Those are my comments so far. The Tannoys are beginning to sing. . .