In any case, what else is there to discuss other than the fact that hd-dvd and bd rips converted to DVD compatible format have very much better PQ than original DVDs, have reasonably acceptable AQ depending on the authoring, but certainly lack special features due to memory constraints?
From where I sit, I could think of some discussion scenarios on bootleg titles that would be censored under the present policy. Let me cite some:
(1) when a poster asks if title X is now available on DVD, will this site allow an answer like: "Yes, Quiapo stall #5 has a DVD9 BD copy of that title since last month."
(2) when a poster complains about title X being grainy or not up to par with what he thinks it should look like, will this site allow a poster to post: "Well, you can try out the BD copy at Quiapo stall #5 as its bitrate is higher than the Y-Interaction copy you have."
(3) when a poster asks what DVD titles are now available for this week or month, will this site allow a response like: "these are the titles on BD and HD DVD copies you can find at YP or BF Ruins just freshly delivered."
(4) when a poster responds saying that title X is now available on 2-disc steelbook for P1200, will this site allow another poster to add: "it's also available on 2-disc DVD9 in Coastal Mall at P150 with higher bitrates."
(5) when a poster asks if upsampling SD DVD would look good on his 42" LCD, will this site allow a response like: "Try the BD copy of title X which at 9mpbs bitrate looks more gorgeous upscaled than what you get at Astral XL."
Those types of responses basically comprise the core of my suggestion. It's simply recognizing and accepting the alternative sources as a normal part of any DVD discussion.
I won't even want a separate section on bootlegs. Just treat them like any DVD retail outlet. All, except engaging in bootleg trade.
At the end of the day, it's all up to the poster/consumer to decide based on the alternatives. If the OP responds: "Ok thanks, but I prefer legits." then fine, that should end all alternative recommendations for the OP. And with no legal infirmity to consider, I don't see how that would be difficult for a forum to allow, is it?