Question lang about the "cross pattern" that is supposed to be a result of an anti-reflective coating. With or without it, I can't really distinguish the "level" of anti-reflection, for me they look very similar. Would we say that it was not really effective?
When comparing reflectivity, look at the sharpness and brightness of the reflected image.
Yes, I think they're not very effective. Reflectivity reduction is very slight, yet side-effects are visible.
On the PV8, users usually see the cross-hatch pattern only when the TV is off. But I've read one foreign forum post saying that he sometimes sees cross-hatch patterns while the TV is on, but only during very dark scenes.
Kamusta naman yung level of reflection ng plasma nila?
My 2006 EDTV is very reflective.
In fact, the reflections are so bad that I initially thought there was no anti reflective coating at all.
But I suspected there was a small amount of AR because I noticed that the ambient reflections on the wall clock hanging above my TV was much worse. On the wall clock, reflections are very sharp; on the TV, reflections are more diffuse and blurred.
I confirmed the presence of AR when I googled for additional descriptions. For example, the following linked page says, "Features: Video noise reduction, Q-link,
anti-reflection coating, Real MACH system, Real Black Drive System ".
http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/plasma-tv/panasonic-th-42pa60/The good part is that my screen has absolutely no cross-hatch patterns.
Iba ang dating ng 50 inches sir! Baka nga mag 50 na din ako 
Bosing, I'm now seriously considering a 50C10.
