Question for aHobbit,
My question is, is there any scientific study, conclusive or not, proven or not, that posits the age of the earth between 6,000 and 10,000 years? I'd like to be enlightened if it exists.
I have not read a dating mechanisms that will agree together to put the age of the earth to whatever figure - though in creation science, a number of possible tools to age the earth using various methods showed so much younger earth compared to the evolutionist depiction ...
thus I said in my post, I can not site specific age ... however, if you ask me, based on my belief of the account of bible depicting human history, it is more or less 7,000 years ... but you should take note, I am not proving the age of human using the Bible, I am just stating that if I made the Bible my reference ...
Thus, whether the Bible is correct (or my interpretation of the Bible is correct) as to the age of human life ... or the age indicated by evolutionist is correct for that matter ... then let science continue its investigation ... it should be noted however that some dating mechanism used by evolutionist before may need adjustments
Yeah! What aHobbit is doing is trying to disprove scientific dating techniques and use their limitations to bolster his claims that the Earth is only 6,000 to 10,000 years old. We want to hear actual findings by your "science" that definitely show that the Earth is really that young.
You read it wrong again ... it is early tools in science that have their respective limitations ... and it is not my depiction ... it is caused by the inevitable development within science ... and what put darwinian theory to so much controversy is that ... it incorporates with it lots of assumptions basing it in the 18xx technologies ... only to be made more exacting in our present time
You may have read in the saga of this evolution thing ... that even the validation of that BOGUS archeopterix materials that champion their missing links ... can only be detected by 1986 ... and finally rested 1990 ... so thus these dating techniques
The problem in this whole argument is that aHobbit claims that "science" is magic and any kind of scientific study or findings are merely "theories" or "hoaxes." What I don't understand is why evolution, to aHobbit's mind is a "theory" and yet Creation is a practically a law. What's the basis for this? Don't tell me that since it's in the bible it's the truth and nothing but.
I'm getting this feeling that at some point here, names like Erich Von Daniken and Zacharias Sitchin will make an appearance and be considered incontrovertible scientific authorities.
Ow, come on! You are just trying to obscure the discussion
... I DID not say Science is not magic ... YOU DID!
... What I did say is that EVOLUTION IS THE MAGIC!
and EVOLUTION IS JUST A THEORY
... and EVOLUTION IS JUST A PIECE OF MANUSCRIPT WRITTEN BY AN IMAGINATIVE MAN
... A theory yet UNPROVEN supported by lots of UNVERIFIED ASSUMPTIONS ... BASED ON 1800 TECHNOLOGIES, UNVALIDATED EVIDENCES, AND INCOMPLETE PROOFS!
And it is no secrets even among scientist, and academicians ... that there have been no substantial validation of the theory that have happened since it was popularized ... in fact, it has further weakened!
As usual ... You can put the Bible and the Theory of Evolution in the same footing - a written manuscript ... but science will prove either one or the other since they poles apart ... and the way science is exposing its flaws, YOUR EVOLUTION is preparing for a burial ...