definitely vt-50 has superior pq being the flagship model. it's just that, the price diff outweighs the advantages of vt-50 for me. but of course if i got the dough flowing, top of the line all the way.
My personal choice is the 50UT50. Primarily because it's relatively cheap (about $1,100); secondly because it doesn't have the louvre filter.
But still, if we're talking
best of the best, I'd say the VT50 would still be considered reasonably-priced.
This year's King of HDTV is the
Panasonic 65" 65VT50, which beat last year's winner, Sharp's
Elite 60" 60x5fd LED. Price of the Panny 65VT50 is about
$3,500. Price of the Elite 60x5fd is now about
$5,000.
So even if you were swimming in cash, you would actually have to spend less to get the best.
ST doesnt have isf control or the filters but its PQ and black levels is very close to the VT.
I think the ST50 does have the filter. I would have preferred the ST50 if it didn't.
Some owners don't like filters on their plasmas. Here's a comment from another filter hater from avsforum:
Between the time I've spent fiddling with ST/VT50s and what I've gathered on the VT50 thread, I've made a quick list of things thus far of problems that the VT50 is having that we will never have.
- DSE (dirty screen effect)
- Rainbow efffect (similar to dlp)
- less natural crispness/vibrancy
- overall darker (despite the contrary)
- poor vertical viewing angle
That's a lot of problems right there. You know what's causing it? The louvre filter. That new and improved, every so wonderful filter will always be the Achilles' heel of the ST/GT/VT50...http://72.9.159.100/avs-vb/showpost.php?p=22036982&postcount=304http://72.9.159.100/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1406618&page=11How ironic. LCD users loved their matte screens and hated plasma's glossy screens. Now, high-end LEDs have glossy screens; high-end plasmas have filtered screens.