I totally disagree with this. Right to Privacy doesn't mean that you have to be a private individual and that you have to be in your house or any place private. Even if you're in a public place, your right to privacy is still there and no one has the right to bug you much less take your photo without your consent. Tulfo's lawyer should dig deeper on the meaning of this right. Sabi nga ni Claudine, is it worth all this trouble just for a scoop? On this point alone, I kinda agree with her.
You sir, are no lawyer.
You are free to disagree but it does not make it less legal. At the end all that matters is the law.
As a private citizen you have the right to privacy. As public figures Raymart & Claudine cannot pick and choose what they want to be made public especially in a public place such as an airport.
The incident at the NAIA 3 is of public interest and as a member of the press Tulfo practiced his constitutionally mandated rights found in our 1987 Constitution. If he cannot practice such rights then we all should be worried. Raymart even attempted to get Tulfo's phone. Would you allow a stranger to take your private property away from you?
Claudine is just saying that because she was caught being herself.
The moral of the story is pipol is to behave properly in public. Just because you are a
has been does not give you the right to verbally abuse minimum wage employees and if you act like a
Senorita do not fly the budget fares. Spend more with the flag carrier.