I got a Mede8er MED600x3D with optional PCIe WiFi kit ---
I'm coming from a WDTV SMP Gen. 3 (2011), so I'll be mentioning some comparisons with it.
First, the bad points:
- Aesthetically, it's an ugly box. The WDTV looks much better.
- The USB sockets are on the left side, none are on the rear. I prefer a rear socket, so that the USB plug is not visible from the front.
- WiFi video playback from a remote disk is not good. It stutters on larger files, around 10Gb and up. YIFY-size files (around 800Mb to 1.2Gb) play without stutters. 5Gb files seem ok so far (I haven't watched a whole movie yet via WiFi), but I have a feeling that stutters will appear as soon as bit rate spikes too high during play.
If wireless streaming from a remote disk is important to you, this player is not for you. Support says additional buffer is not possible.
- Chapter names are not supported. I normally don't need chapter names, but I do need them for concert files. Without them, it's very inconvenient trying to find the song I want to play on a concert video file. Support says chapter names are not possible, as a limitation of the chipset.
Good points:
- It's fast; much faster than my WDTV.
- Remote is good. It's responsive; it has a bright back light.
- User interface does not look so good, parang China generic ang porma
(Mede8er is a South African company).
But they have free downloadable themes on their forums, and it's easy to change the original skin/theme.
http://www.mede8erforum.com/index.php/board,135.0.html I chose the one that looks like a WDTV theme (unofficial skin contributed by a forum member) ---
- WiFi performace is good on apps, but WiFi streaming from a remote disk only works properly on small, low bit rate video files.
- GUI functionality is more extensive than the WDTV. Many options are availabe on the fly. There's a very useful progress bar with a pointer that can be moved to any position on the bar, for PC-like scene selection.
- Picture is good. I didn't have a chance to make a side by side comparison with my WDTV, but I can't recall any picture quality difference. Color, tint and brightness out of the box were the same as my WDTV, as confirmed by a quick check using the AVSHD calibration files. Contrast and sharpness are also good. No fake sharpening, no fake noise reduction. Film grain on film-based videos remain intact.
- Sound is also the same as the WDTV. Looks like the sound is streamed as is, without tweaking, which is a good thing.
- Dolby TrueHD and DTS HD MA passthrough work fine.