Since it's apparently not clear, I'll place the key word in boldface this time.
For the third time: a
general boycott is NOT a solution. I have not added the term "general" to any of the previous posts. This statement is in response to this quote:
you guys have to go all the way...stop buying non-Warner releases, no matter how HUGE/TEMPTING the title is
I find it ludicrous to advocate a
general Viva DVD boycott for misprints on ONE title. DVD-Freak also made this same point a few posts back. They brought in Alien Quadrilogy, the Star Wars Trilogy, The Sound of Music, Titanic... all at VERY reasonable prices when compared to their R1 counterparts, and at even better prices during the too-numerous-to-count Podium sales we have in this country. As it is, firewired has often stated here that the 299 sale price is AT A LOSS, just to get rid of inventory. By advocating a general boycott of
all their titles, you'll effectively be putting them out of business. And ALL these GOOD DVD9 titles will stop coming in. So who loses in the long run?
If you want to boycott
Narnia, be my guest. In fact, I actually DID. If you check my second post on this thread, I even stated that the defective printing should be used as basis to return the discs before anyone else brought up getting refunds.
As far as
King Kong is concerned, as I also previously stated on a separate thread, I personally think that Php 895 with a free DVD is an acceptable price to pay when you compare it to its $19 R1 counterpart with better printing. Because although the shoddy printing/lousy keep case bothers me, I personally don't consider better packaging to be more important than a 15% savings PLUS a free disc. And that's $19 before shipping and handling.
It's really a question of what's important to the individual consumer.