^ yup. it's at least a far better alternative than relying on a baseless "magic" of creationism.
Why this insistence that there should be an "alternative"?
If evolution is speculation, admit that it's speculation. If you do not believe in creation, that's OK.
Just because you don't believe in creation, it doesn't automatically mean that evolution is a fact, "because there is no other alternative."
What's the alternative?
Sorry, walang evidence, Pero sigurado ako--faith lang iyan. Wait for the end of time for proof.
Again this insistence on an "alternative."
"Sorry, walang evidence" - Ok yon, aminin mong walang evidence, imbis na sabihin mong sa evolution tayo dapat, kasi wala nang alternative."Pero sigurado ako--faith lang iyan." - Wag mo nang pakialaman ang religion. Basta patunayan mo na lang ang evolution.
You reason that if evidence for creation is weak, then evolution must be correct.
Hindi ganon yon. If evolution is a fact, then prove it.
=======================================
Ganito na lang ang gawin natin:
Science is saying that there is overwhelming evidence proving that evolution is a fact. If so, then must be really easy to prove that reptiles evolved into birds.
Present evidence that reptiles evolved into birds, and let's discuss it.