Sorry Jetok but I am not using a triode.
The Triode SE or SET for short is a well traveled path, the sound outcome is very prdeictable. Triodes have become very expensive also as there are very few choices you can make. DHT's or directly heated triodes like 2a3 and 300B are very inefficient and have very high interelectrode capacitance. Inter electrode capacitance increases as the size of the tubes get larger. Sound wise it becomes very difficult for the tubes to amplify high frequencies (Where all the details of the music resides). The founding fathers of audio knew this before the 1940's so they invented by pouring a lot of money in research to what many audiophiles today hate, the Pentode or Tetrode. This very same (but now hated by many audiophiles) pentode ushered in the "golden Age of Hifi Audio". What could be wrong with it?What I am doing is taking a different look at the tube and see what it can do. To say that I am now listening to SEP (P for tetrode or pentode) now with improved dynamics, greater detail which translates to wider sound stage, yet with excellent low frequency extension and higher efficiency (means less money). Many will not agree with my approach, most likely the triode fans, but all these components, triode and pentodes, and the wealth of information left to us by the founding fathers of audio must be looked at a different perspective. Discarding nothing and trying to use all to our advantage. I do not want a debate with anyone, I am just taking the road less traveled!
A journey to audio nirvanah land via the Pentode road. So far it has not been bumpy. I have tried the triode road, now I want to take the other and rediscover.